SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2009 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3

Explaining Academic Achievement in Secondary Teacher Training Programme Through Distance Mode

Mamta GARG
Sudesh GAKHAR
Pages
128–145
Publication Date
2009-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings of the study showed that 72.1% of the variance towards the criterion variable of performance in theory papers was explained by fourteen independent variables (one background variable and thirteen measures of personal characteristics), 63.5% variance in performance in skills in teaching of the trainees was explained by eleven independent variables which included ten variables of personal characteristics and one background variable, and a total variance of 62.8% in their overall academic performance was explained by their nine variables (one background and eight variables of personal characteristics).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The academic performance of the learners is of great concern in every format of education.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The present investigation has been undertaken to locate the background and personal variables which may best predict the academic performance of secondary teacher trainees in distance education.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings of the study showed that 72.1% of the variance towards the criterion variable of performance in theory papers was explained by fourteen independent variables (one background variable and thirteen measures of personal characteristics), 63.5% variance in performance in skills in teaching of the trainees was explained by eleven independent variables which included ten variables of personal characteristics and one background variable, and a total variance of 62.8% in their overall academic performance was explained by their nine variables (one background and eight variables of personal characteristics).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Academic Achievement · Teacher Training · Distance Education

Abstract

The academic performance of the learners is of great concern in every format of education. The promotion of the academic achievement is an integral part of goals to be achieved in higher education. The present investigation has been undertaken to locate the background and personal variables which may best predict the academic performance of secondary teacher trainees in distance education. The findings of the study showed that 72.1% of the variance towards the criterion variable of performance in theory papers was explained by fourteen independent variables (one background variable and thirteen measures of personal characteristics), 63.5% variance in performance in skills in teaching of the trainees was explained by eleven independent variables which included ten variables of personal characteristics and one background variable, and a total variance of 62.8% in their overall academic performance was explained by their nine variables (one background and eight variables of personal characteristics). These findings may be used to improve the services provided to the distance teacher trainees. As guidelines for in-service education planners and educators, the findings of the study can help in redefining goals, needs and approaches to teach, for this group of “double-role” in-service teacher trainee

🔖

Cite This Article

GARG, M., GAKHAR, S. (2009). Explaining Academic Achievement in Secondary Teacher Training Programme Through Distance Mode. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3, 128–145. https://ajindex.com/articles/140818

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Alderman, M. K. (1999). Goals and goal setting. Motivation for achievement: possibilities for teaching and learning. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Calder, J., & McCallum, A. (1998). Open and flexible learning in vocational education and training. London: Kogan Page. Candy, P. C. (1991). Self-direction for lifelong learning. San Francisco: Jossey Bass. Cooke, D. K., Sims, R. L., & Peyrefitte, J. (1995). The relationship between graduate student attitudes and attrition. The Journal of Psychology, 129, 688. Dzakiria, H., Razak, A.A., & Mohammad, A.H. (2004). Improving distance courses: Understanding teacher trainees and their learning styles for the design of teacher training courses and materials at a distance. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 5 (1). Fredericksen, E., Pickett, A., & Shea, P. (2000). Student satisfaction and perceived learning with on-line courses: Principles and examples from the SUNY learning network. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 4(2). Retrieved November12, 2005, from http://www.aln.org/alnweb/journal/jaln-vol4issue2.htm.
  2. Gadzella, B. M. (1995). Differences in academic achievement as a function of scores on hemisphericity. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 81, 153-154.
  3. Garrison, D.R. (1990). An analysis and evaluation of audio teleconferencing to facilitate education at a distance. The American Journal of Distance Education, 4(3), 16-23.
  4. Haythorntwaite, C., Kazmer, M. M. & Robins, J. (2000). Community development among distance learners: Temporal and technological dimensions. The Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(1). Holmberg, B. (1986). Growth and structure of distance education. Kent, England: Croom Helm. Holmberg, B. (1989). Theory and practice of distance education. New York: Routledge. Knowles, M. (1980). The modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to andragogy (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall/Cambridge. Koc, M. (2005). Individual learner differences in web-based learning environments: From cognitive, affective and social-cultural perspectives. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 6(4). Latanich, G, Nonis, S. A., & Hudson, G. I. A. (2001). Profile of today's distance learners: An investigation of demographic and individual difference variables of distance and non-distance learners. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 11 (3), 1-16.
  5. Martinez, A. (2002). Distance learning and teacher education. Karen‘s Linguistic Issues. Retrieved September 15, 2005 from