SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2006 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

The Models Of Didactıcal Process Communicatıons in Traditional And Distance Learning Systems: Analyses The State Of The Art

Elena RAILEAN
Pages
121–136
Publication Date
2006-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The last model needs self –regulated students’ competence of learning.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper consists of an analysis of the state of the art of research and development for the different models of didactical processes in traditional and distance learning systems.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The educational system is an open and dynamic system.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The last model needs self –regulated students’ competence of learning.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Communication · Educational Models · Communication

Abstract

This paper consists of an analysis of the state of the art of research and development for the different models of didactical processes in traditional and distance learning systems. The educational system is an open and dynamic system. In such context as the educational system, seven models of didactical process communications can be observed. The contemporary models are based on collective knowledge building in collaborative learning environments. The last model needs self –regulated students’ competence of learning.

🔖

Cite This Article

RAILEAN, E. (2006). The Models Of Didactıcal Process Communicatıons in Traditional And Distance Learning Systems: Analyses The State Of The Art. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 121–136. https://ajindex.com/articles/140636

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. BAUMART, J. et all; Self–regulated learning as a cross – curricular competence, OECD, PISA BOEKAERTS, M., (2002), Bringing about change in the classroom: strength and weaknesses of the self-regulated learning approach – EARLI Presidential Address, 2001, Learning and Instruction 12 (2002), p. 589-604.
  2. BOEKAERTS, M., Alexander Minnaert, Self-regulation with respect to informal learning, Educational Research 31 (1999) 533-544
  3. BOEKAERTS, M., Bringing about change in the classroom: strengths and weaknesses of the self-regulated learning approach—EARLI Presidential, Learning and Instruction 12 (2002) 589–604
  4. Boekaerts M., Interest in learning, learning to be interested, Learning and Instruction 12 (2002) 375–382
  5. Boekaerts M., Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy markets, educators, teachers and students., Learning and Instruction, V7 N2, p.161-187, 1997
  6. BOEKAERTS, M., (199). Self-regulated learning: where we are today, International Journal of Educational Research 31, 445}457. BOLHUIS, S., Voeten M.J.M., Toward self-directed learning in secondary schools: what do teachers do? Teaching and Teacher Education 17 (2001) 837–85.
  7. BRUSILOVSKY, P., Schwarz, E., & Weber, G. (1996). ELM-ART: An intelligent tutoring system on World Wide Web. In Frasson, C., Gauthier, G., & Lesgold, A. (Ed.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. ). Berlin: Springer Verlag. 261-269.
  8. CAPLAN, D., (1998), The Invisible People: Educational Technologists- Do We Exist?, http://www.usask.ca/education/coursework/802papers/caplan/invisible.html Educational Systems Theory http://www.education.indiana.edu/~frick/fastback/fastback326.html#nature
  9. FRICK, T. W.,(2002) Restructuring Education Through Technology http://www.education.indiana.edu/~frick/fastback/fastback326.html#nature
  10. GRAESSER, A.C.; Chipman, P.; Haynes, B.C.; Olney, A (2005), AutoTutor: An Intelligent Tutoring System With Mixed-Initiative Dialogue. Education, IEEE Transactions on, Volume 48, Issue 4, Nov. 2005 Page(s): 612–618.
  11. JENSEN, S. S, Heilesen S. B. Time, place, and Identity in Project Work on the Net, in book Roberts T. S. Computer–Supported Collaborative Learning in Higher Education, IDEA GROUP PUBLISHING, 2005.
  12. Marsh G.E. II, Constructivism, and Instructional Technology http://www.healthnet.org.np/training/msoffice/access/WW189.htm
  13. OKADA, A.L. P., The Collective Building of Knowledge in Collaborative Learning Environments., in book: Roberts T.S., Computer – Supporte