SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2006 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

Impact of VoIP and QoS on Open and Distance Learning

P. C. SAXENA SCSS, Jawaharlal Nehru University

P. C. SAXENA SCSS
Sanjay JASOLA
Ramesh C. SHARMA
Pages
28–42
Publication Date
2006-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The impact of these technologies on distance education has also been explored in the paper.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) is becoming a reality in many organizations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Efforts of standards like 802.11e which will take care of these issues, have also been explored.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The impact of these technologies on distance education has also been explored in the paper.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Computer Networks · Voice Over Internet Protocol (voip) · TCP/IP

Abstract

Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) is becoming a reality in many organizations. The potential for mobility in voice over wi-fi networks will derive demand for the technology. Wireless VoIP is poised to rival VoIP as an alternative telephony tool. Internet has been used to transport data in the form of packet. In the past, Internet did not support any kind of sophisticated quality of service (QoS) mechanism. Although the type of service (TOS) field in the Internet protocol (IP) header has been existing and has been allowing the differentiated treatment of packets, it was never really used on a large scale. The voice is sensitive to delay and jitter so bandwidth must be guaranteed while transporting it. With the extensive use of Internet for carrying voice, there is a need to add QoS functionality in it. QoS with reference to VoIP has been discussed in the paper. Limited bandwidth and network latency are the issues which need to be considered while using wireless LAN for packetized voice data. Efforts of standards like 802.11e which will take care of these issues, have also been explored. The impact of these technologies on distance education has also been explored in the paper.

🔖

Cite This Article

SCSS, P. C. S., JASOLA, S., SHARMA, R. C. (2006). Impact of VoIP and QoS on Open and Distance Learning. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 28–42. https://ajindex.com/articles/140635

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. BARDEN, B.; Zhang, L.; Berson, S.; Herzog, S.; & Jamin, S. (1997). Resource reservation Protocol (RSVP) version 1: Functional Specification, RFC 2205, Internet Engineering Task Force, October, 1997.
  2. BATES, T. (2001). National strategies for e-learning in post-secondary education and training, Paris: UNESCO, IIEP BERGE, Z., Collins, M. and Dougherty, K. (2000). Design guidelines for web-based courses, in Abby, B. (ed) Instructional and cognitive impacts of web-based education, (pp. 32-40), Hershey: IDEA Group BRUNO, S. (2001). Fixed mobile internet convergence (FMIC). Telematics and Informatics IS (2001), pp. 135-141.
  3. COFFMAN, S. (2001). Distance education and virtual reference: Where are we headed, Computers in Libraries, 21 (4), April 2001, pp. 20-25.
  4. DONOVAN, S. & Cannon, M. (1998). A Functional Description of SIP-PSTN Gateway, Internet Draft, IETF, November. GARRISON, D. (2004). E-Learning in the 21st Century, London: RoutledgeFalmer GEIER, J. (2004). Voice over wireless LAN, wi-fi Planet. GUPTA, S. D. (2003). VoIP: Packaged voice and more, Network magazine, pp. 54 HAMDI, M.; Verscheure, O.; and Hubaux, J.-P. (2003). Voice service interworking for PSTN and IP networks. IEEE Communication Magazine 5, pp. 104-111.
  5. HANDLEY, M.; Schulzrinne, H.; Schooler, E.; & Rosenberg, J. (2001). SIP: Session Initiation Protocol, Internet Draft, IET F, January. http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/11/Reports/tge_update.htm http://qos.ittc.ukans.edu/ipqos/ip_qos.htm ITU-T Recommendation H.323, Systems for multimedia communication in packet mode, 1998.
  6. LAURILLARD, D. (2002). Rethinking University Teaching: a conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies, London: Routledge LIPSET, V. (2004). VoIP Synergy: Voice to drive wireless adoption, wi-fi Planet. MASON, R. (1998). Models of on-line courses. ALN Magazine, 2(2) Retrieved March, 2006, from http://www.aln.org/publications/magazine/v2n2/mason.asp
  7. MAYES, T. (2000).
  8. Pedagogy, Lifelong Learning and ICT, Retrieved on March 24, from http://www.ipm.ucl.ac.be/ChaireIBM/Mayes.pdf
  9. MINOLI, D.; & Minoli, E. (1998). Delivering Voice over IP Networks. New York: Wiley. MITRA, S. (1999). Virtual institutions in the Indian subcontinent, (pp. 125-134), in Farrell, G. (ed) The Development of Virtual Education: A Global perspective, Vancouver: The Commonwealth of Learning MORTADA, I. & Probst, W. (2001). Internet telephony signaling. Telematics and Informatics 18 (2001), pp. 159-194.
  10. ROSSEN, E. and Hartley, D. (2001)