SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 43 Sayı: 4

Technology Readiness Index (TRI) 2.0: Adaptation to Turkish, Validity and Reliability Study

Teknoloji Hazırlık İndeksi (THİ) 2.0: Türkçeye Uyarlama, Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Zahide Kübra Koçak(ERCİYES ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-1274-7841
Ayşe Cingöz(ERCİYES ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-0654-5349
Pages
782–812
Publication Date
2025-12-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results obtained, it was seen that the scale maintained its four-dimensional structure as in the original and was a highly valid and reliable scale.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to adapt the Technology Readiness Index 2.0 developed by Parasuraman and Colby (2015) into Turkish and introduce it to the national literature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the study, Öztürk et al. (2015) and Büyüköztürk et al. (2020), the scale adaptation steps were followed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results obtained, it was seen that the scale maintained its four-dimensional structure as in the original and was a highly valid and reliable scale.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Teknoloji Hazırlığı · Ölçek Uyarlama · Geçerlik

Abstract

The aim of this study is to adapt the Technology Readiness Index 2.0 developed by Parasuraman and Colby (2015) into Turkish and introduce it to the national literature. In the study, Öztürk et al. (2015) and Büyüköztürk et al. (2020), the scale adaptation steps were followed. Accordingly, preliminary preparation, language equivalent studies, and examination of psychometric properties (validity and reliability) stages were carried out within the scope of adaptation. Within the scope of validity and reliability studies, exploratory factor analysis was conducted first. Confirmatory tetrad analysis was then conducted to test the structure's conformity to the reflective/formative structure together with the theoretical and conceptual indications in the literature; then, both first-level and second-level confirmatory factor analyses were conducted. A two-stage approach was used in the development of the second-level structure. SPSS 24.0 and SmartPLS 4.1.0.6 programsa re used in the analyses. According to the results obtained, it was seen that the scale maintained its four-dimensional structure as in the original and was a highly valid and reliable scale.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı Parasuraman ve Colby (2015) tarafından geliştirilen Teknoloji Hazırlık İndeksi 2.0’ı Türkçeye uyarlamak ve ulusal alan yazına kazandırmaktır. Çalışmada Öztürk vd. (2015) ve Büyüköztürk vd. (2020) tarafından ortaya konulan ölçek uyarlama adımları takip edilmiştir. Buna göre uyarlama kapsamında ön hazırlık, dil eş değerlik çalışmaları ve psikometrik özelliklerin incelenmesi (geçerlik ve güvenirlik) aşamaları gerçekleştirilmiştir. Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmaları kapsamında öncelikle açımlayıcı faktör analizi yapılmıştır. Literatürdeki teorik ve kavramsal işaretlerle birlikte yapının reflektif/formatif yapıya uygunluğunu test etmek amacıyla doğrulayıcı tetrad analizi; ardından hem birinci düzey hem de ikinci düzey doğrulayıcı faktör analizi yapılmıştır. İkinci düzey yapının geliştirilmesinde iki aşamalı yaklaşım kullanılmıştır. Analizlerde SPSS 24.0 ve SmartPLS 4.1.0.6 programları kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre ölçeğin orijinalinde olduğu gibi dört boyutlu yapısını koruduğu ve üst düzey geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçek olduğu görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

Koçak, Z. K., Cingöz, A. (2025). Technology Readiness Index (TRI) 2.0: Adaptation to Turkish, Validity and Reliability Study. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 43 Sayı: 4, 782–812. https://doi.org/10.17065/huniibf.1541630

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (61)

  1. Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1998). A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 204-215. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.9.2.204
  2. Bakırtaş, H., & Akkaş, C. (2020). Technology readiness and technology acceptance of academic staffs. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 16(4), 1043-1058. https://doi.org/10.17130/ijmeb.853629
  3. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Erkan Akgün, Ö., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2020). Eğitimde bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. (30. Baskı). Pegem Akademi.
  4. Chang, Y. W., & Chen, J. (2021). What motivates customers to shop in smart shops? The impacts of smart technology and technology readiness. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 58, 2-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102325
  5. Chen, Y.,C. Shang, R.A., & Li, M.J. (2014). The effects of perceived relevance of travel blogs’ content on the behavioral intention to visit a tourist destination. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 787–799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.019
  6. Chen, J., & Chang, Y. W. (2023). How smart technology empowers consumers in smart retail stores? The perspective of technology readiness and situational factors. Electronic Markets, 33(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-023-00635-6
  7. Child, D. (2006). The Essentials of Factor Analysis.Continuum.
  8. Choi, J., & Yoo, D. (2021). The impacts of self-construal and perceived risk on technology readiness. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16, 1584–1597. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16050089 Chung, N., Han, H., & Joun, Y. (2015). Tourists’ intention to visit a destination: The role of augmented reality (AR) application for a heritage site. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 588–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.068
  9. Churchill, G. A. J. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 64-73. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377901600110
  10. Cingöz, A. ve Koçak, Z. K. (2024). Akıllı müşteri deneyimi ölçeği: Türkçeye uyarlama, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 16(2), 1166-1183. https://doi.org/10.20491/isarder2024.1849
  11. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  12. Demirci, A. E., & Ersoy, N. F. (2008). Technology readiness for innovative high-tech products: How consumers perceive and adopt new technologies. Business Review, 11(1), 302-309.
  13. Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
  14. Elliott, K., M. Meng, J., & Hall, M. C. (2008). Technology readiness and the likelihood to use self-service technology: Chinese vs. American consumers. Marketing Management Journal, 18, 20–31. https://doi.org/10.63963/001c.150946
  15. Eriş, E. D. & Kocabıyık, M. S. (2023). Teknoloji kabul modelleri ve teknoloji hazırlık odaklı çalışmalara yönelik bibliyometrik bir analiz: Turizm yayınları örneklemi. İktisadi ve İdari Araştırmalar Dergisi, 12, 42-56. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/3156178 Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  16. Gao, J., Ren L., Yang, Y., Duo Z., & Li, L. (2021). The impact of artificial intelligence technology stimuli on smart customer experience and the moderating effect of technology readiness. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 17(4), 1123-1142. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-06-2021-0975
  17. Gudergan, S. P., Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Will, A. (2008). Confirmatory tetrad analysis in PLS path modeling. Journal of Business Research, 61(12), 1238-1249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.012
  18. Hackbarth, G., Grover, V., & Mun, Y. Y. (2003). Computer playfulness and anxiety: Positive and negative mediators of the system experience effect on perceived ease of use. Information & Management, 40(3), 221-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(02)00006-X
  19. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. (7th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
  20. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M. & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
  21. Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2024). Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  22. Hemdi, M., Rahman, S., Hanafiah, M., & Adanan, A. (2016). Airport self-service check-in: The influence of technology readiness on customer satisfaction. In S.M. Radzi, M.H.M. Hanafiah, N. Sumarjan, Z. Mohi, D. Sukyadi, K. Suryadi, & P. Purnawarman (Eds.), Heritage, culture and society (pp. 537-541). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315386980-95
  23. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
  24. Huy, L. V., Nguyen, P. T. H., Pham, L., & Berry, R. (2019). Technology readiness and satisfaction in Vietnam’s luxury hotels. International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 18(2), 183-208. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMDM.2019.098648
  25. Igbaria, M., Schiffman, S. J., & Wieckowski, T. J. (1994). The respective roles of perceived usefulness and perceived fun in the acceptance of microcomputer technology. Behaviour & Information Technology, 13(6), 349-361. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449299408914616
  26. Jarvis, C. B., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 199-218. https://doi.org/10.1086/376806
  27. Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W. & Chervany, N.L. (1999). Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 183-213. https://doi.org/10.2307/249751
  28. Kline, P. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. Routledge.
  29. Lee, W., Castellanos, C. & Chris Choi, H. (2012). The effect of technology readiness on customers’ attitudes toward self-service technology and its adoption; the empirical study of US airline self-service check-in kiosks. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 29, 731–743. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2012.730934
  30. Liljander, V. Gillberg, F. Gummerus, J., & Van Riel, A. (2006). Technology readiness and the evaluation and adoption of self-service technologies. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 13, 177–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2005.08.004
  31. Lin, J. S. C. & Hsieh, P. L. (2006). The role of technology readiness in customers’ perception and adoption of self-service technologies. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 17(5), 497-517. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564230610689795
  32. Lin, J. S. C. & Hsieh, P. L. (2007). The influence of technology readiness on satisfaction and behavioral intentions toward self-service technologies. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1597–1615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.07.006
  33. Lin, C. H., Shih, H. Y., & Sher, P. (2007). Integrating technology readiness into technology acceptance: The TRAM model. Psychology & Marketing, 24(7), 641–657. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20177
  34. Ma, E., Yang, H., Wang, Y-C., & Song, H. (2022). Building restaurant customers’ technology readiness through robot-assisted experiences at multiple product levels. Tourism Management, 93, 104610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104610
  35. Mick, D. G., & Fournier, S. (1998). Paradoxes of technology: Consumer cognizance, emotions, and coping strategies. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 123-147. https://doi.org/10.1086/209531
  36. Öztürk, N. B., Eroğlu, M. G. & Kelecioğlu, H. (2015). Eğitim alanında yapılan ölçek uyarlama makalelerinin incelenmesi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 40(178), 123-137. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2015.4091
  37. Pantano, E., & Vannucci, V. (2019). Who is innovating? An exploratory research of digital technologies diffusion in retail industry. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 49, 297-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.01.019
  38. Pantano, E., Pedeliento, G., & Christodoulides, G. (2022). A strategic framework for technological innovations in support of the customer experience: A focus on luxury retailers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 66, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.102959
  39. Parasuraman, A. (2000). Technology readiness index (TRI) a multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies. Journal of Service Research, 2(4), 307–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/109467050024001
  40. Parasuraman, A., & Colby, C. (2001). Techno-ready marketing: How and why your customers adopt technology. New York, NY: The Free Press, Division of Simon & Schuster.
  41. Parasuraman, A., & Colby, C. L. (2015). An updated and streamlined technology readiness index: TRI 2.0. Journal of Service Research, 18(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670514539730
  42. Pradhan, M. K., Oh, J., & Lee, H. (2018). Understanding travelers’ behavior for sustainable smart tourism: A technology readiness perspective. Sustainability, 10, 4259. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114259
  43. Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Straub, D. W. (2012). Editor’s comments: A critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in MIS quarterly. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410402
  44. Rosenbaum, M. S., & Wong, I. A., (2015). If you install it, will they use it? Understanding why hospitality customers take “technological pauses” from self-service technology. Journal of Business Research., 68(9), 1862–1868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.01.014
  45. Roy, S. K., Balaji, M., Quazi, A., & Quaddus, M. (2018). Predictors of customer acceptance of and resistance to smart technologies in the retail sector. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 42, 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.02.005
  46. Seong, B. H., & Hong, C. Y. (2022). Corroborating the effect of positive technology readiness on the intention to use the virtual reality sports game “Screen Golf”: Focusing on the technology readiness and acceptance model. Information Processing and Management 59, 102994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2022.102994
  47. Song, H., Ruan, W. J., & Jeon, Y. J. J. (2021). An integrated approach to the purchase decision making process of food-delivery apps–Focusing on the TAM and AIDA models. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 95, 102943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.102943
  48. Sönmez, E. ve Akgül, H. (2015). Üniversite öğrencilerinin teknolojiye hazır bulunuşluk düzeyi ve kişilik özellikleri arasındaki ilişki: Erciyes Üniversitesi örneği. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 13(26), 305-327.
  49. Summak, S. M., Bağlıbel, M., & Samancıoğlu, M. (2010). Technology readiness of primary school teachers: A case study in Turkey. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2671–2675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.393
  50. Süral Özer, P., Eriş, E. D. ve Timurcanday Özmen, Ö. N. (2011). Teknolojiye hazırlık düzeyinin belirlenmesine yönelik bir ölçek uyarlama çalısması. İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(2), 321-333.
  51. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Allyn and Bacon. Tavşancıl, E. (2002). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi. Nobel Yayıncılık.
  52. Tom Dieck, M. C., & Han, D. D. (2022). The role of immersive technology in customer experience management. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 30(1), 108-119, https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2021.1891939
  53. Tsikriktsis, N. (2004). A technology readiness-based taxonomy of customers: A replication and extension. Journal of Service Research, 7(1), 42-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670504266132
  54. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  55. Victorino, L., Karniouchina, E., & Verma, R. (2009). Exploring the use of the abbreviated technology readiness index for hotel customer segmentation. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 50(3), 342–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/1938965509336809
  56. Walczuch, R., Lemmink, J., & Streukens, S. (2007). The effect of service employees’ technology readiness on technology acceptance. Information & Management, 44(2), 206-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.12.005
  57. Wang, Y., So, K. K. F., & Sparks, B. A. (2017). Technology readiness and customer satisfaction with travel technologies: A cross-country investigation. Journal of Travel Research, 56(5), 563–577. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287516657891
  58. We Are Social (2023). Digital 2023 global overview report. 12 Temmuz 2024 tarihinde https://wearesocial.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Digital-2023-Global-Overview-Report.pdf adresinden alınmıştır.
  59. Westjohn, S. A., Arnold, M. J., Magnusson, P., Zdravkovic, S., & Zhou, J. X. (2009). Technology readiness and usage: A global-identity perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37, 250–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-008-0130-0
  60. Wilson, B. &Henseler, J. (2007). Modeling reflective higher-order constructs using three approaches with PLS path modeling: A monte carlo comparison. In M. Thyne, & K.R. Deans (Eds.), ANZMAC 2007: conference proceedings and refereed papers (pp. 791-800). ANZMAC.
  61. Zeng, N., Ryding, D., Vignali, G., & Pantano, E. (2025). AR atmospherics and virtual social presence impacts on customer experience and customer engagement behaviours. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 53(1), 58-73. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-08-2023-0520