SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 44 Sayı: 1

Perceived Overqualification and Supportive Voice: Understanding the Relative Deprivation and Group Dynamics

Algılanan Fazla Niteliklilik ve Destekleyici Ses Davranışı: Göreli Yoksunluk ve Grup Dinamiklerini Kavramak

Sezgi Sozber(ATILIM UNIVERSITY, ACADEMY OF CIVIL AVIATION)0000-0002-7038-3989
Pınar Bayhan Karapınar(HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-0534-8885
Pages
191–211
Publication Date
2026-03-23
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Hierarchical linear modeling results demonstrate that POQ positively affects both supportive voice behavior and relative deprivation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Drawing on relative deprivation and psychological contract theory, this study explored the relationship between perceived overqualification (POQ) and supportive voice.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data were gathered from 204 employees and 32 of their supervisors, nested within 32 workgroups in the civil aviation sector in Türkiye.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Hierarchical linear modeling results demonstrate that POQ positively affects both supportive voice behavior and relative deprivation.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Algılanan Fazla Niteliklilik · Destekleyici Ses Davranışı · Grup Fazla Nitelikliliği

Abstract

Drawing on relative deprivation and psychological contract theory, this study explored the relationship between perceived overqualification (POQ) and supportive voice. It further examined the mediating role of relative deprivation and perceived group overqualification, as boundary conditions affecting the relationship between POQ and relative deprivation behavior. Data were gathered from 204 employees and 32 of their supervisors, nested within 32 workgroups in the civil aviation sector in Türkiye. Hierarchical linear modeling results demonstrate that POQ positively affects both supportive voice behavior and relative deprivation. However, the findings did not support the hypothesized mediating effect of relative deprivation and the moderating role of perceived group overqualification. These insights provide recommendations for managers on effectively managing overqualified employees.

Özet

Göreli Yoksunluk ve Psikolojik Sözleşme Teorilerine dayanarak, bu araştırma algılanan fazla niteliklilik ve destekleyici ses davranışı arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektedir. Ayrıca, bu ilişkide göreli yoksunluğun aracılık rolü ve algılanan grup fazla nitelikliliği ise, algılanan fazla niteliklilik ile göreli yoksunluk arasındaki ilişkide sınırlandırıcı koşul olarak ele alınmıştır. Veriler, Türkiye’de sivil havacılık sektörü içerisinde 32 çalışma grubu içerisinde yer alan 204 çalışan ve bu çalışanların 32 yöneticisinden toplanmıştır. Hiyerarşik lineer modelleme sonuçlarına göre, algılanan fazla niteliklilik destekleyici ses davranışı ve göreli yoksunluk üzerinde doğrudan pozitif bir etkiye sahiptir. Ancak, çalışmada göreli yoksunluğun aracılık rolü ve grup fazla nitelikliliğinin düzenleyicilik rolü desteklenmemiştir. Elde edilen bulgular, yöneticilere fazla nitelikli çalışanları etkili bir şekilde yönetme konusunda tavsiyeler sunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Sozber, S., Karapınar, P. B. (2026). Perceived Overqualification and Supportive Voice: Understanding the Relative Deprivation and Group Dynamics. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 44 Sayı: 1, 191–211. https://doi.org/10.17065/huniibf.1670088

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (89)

  1. Alarcón, D., Sánchez, J. A., & De Olavide, U. (2015). Assessing convergent and discriminant vali-dity in the ADHD-R IV rating scale: User-written commands for average variance extracted (AVE), composite reliability (CR), and heterotrait-monotrait ratio of correlations (HTMT). Spanish STATA Meeting.
  2. Alfes, K. (2013). Perceived overqualification and performance: The role of the peer-group. Ger-man Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(4), 314–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/239700221302700403
  3. Alfes, K., Shantz, A., & van Baalen, S. (2016). Reducing perceptions of overqualification and its impact on job satisfaction: The dual roles of interpersonal relationships at work. Human Resource Management Journal, 26(1), 84–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12094
  4. Almagharbeh, B. K. A., Hamouche, S., & Shamout, M. D. (2024). Impact of perceived overqualifi-cation on knowledge hiding and service delivery performance: The moderating role of oc-cupational instrumentality. Knowledge and Process Management, 31(2), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1772
  5. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psyc-hological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Perso-nality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
  6. Baruch, Y., & Rousseau, D. M. (2019). Integrating psychological contracts and ecosystems in ca-reer studies and management. Academy of Management Annals, 13(1), 84–111. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0103
  7. Baumeister, R. F., & Hutton, D. G. (1987). Self-presentation theory: Self-construction and audien-ce pleasing. In B. Mullen & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 71–87). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4634-3_4
  8. Bell, A., Jones, K., & Fairbrother, M. (2018). Understanding and misunderstanding group mean centering: A commentary on Kelley et al.’s dangerous practice. Quality & Quantity, 52(5), 2031–2036. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0593-5
  9. Biemann, T., Cole, M. S., & Voelpel, S. (2012). Within-group agreement: On the use (and misuse) of rWG and rWG(J) in leadership research and some best practice guidelines. The Lea-dership Quarterly, 23(1), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.11.006
  10. Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349–381). Jossey-Bass.
  11. Bolino, M. C. (1999). Citizenship and impression management: Good soldiers or good actors? Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 82–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/259038
  12. Burris, E. R. (2012). The risks and rewards of speaking up: Managerial responses to employee voice. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 851–875. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0562
  13. Callan, M. J., Shead, N. W., & Olson, J. M. (2011). Personal relative deprivation, delay discoun-ting, and gambling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(5), 955–966. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024778
  14. Chu, F. (2021). Congruence in perceived overqualification of team members and organizational identification. International Journal of Manpower, 42(3), 488–501. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-09-2019-0429
  15. Crosby, F. (1976). A model of egoistical relative deprivation. Psychological Review, 83(2), 85–113.
  16. Cui, Z. (2023). Good soldiers or bad apples? Exploring the impact of employee narcissism on constructive and destructive voice. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 715. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02230-8
  17. Çankır, B. (2016). How do voice behavior on employees? An application to correlations between organizational trust, psychological contract violation, leader-member exchange and posi-tive voice behavior. Kırklareli University Journal of the Faculty of Economics and Admi-nistrative Science, 5(2), 1–12. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/klujfeas/issue/26889/283218
  18. Debus, M. E., Körner, B., Wang, M., & Kleinmann, M. (2023). Reacting to perceived overqualifi-cation: Uniting strain-based and self-regulatory adjustment reactions and the modera-ting role of formal work arrangements. Journal of Business and Psychology, 38(2), 411–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-022-09870-8
  19. Denizhan, B., & Doğru, A. (2017). Analysis of employability for the civil aviation maintenance graduates of Turkey. European Journal of Training and Development, 41(9), 800–813. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-01-2017-0006
  20. Duan, J., Xu, Y., Wang, X., Wu, C.-H., & Wang, Y. (2021). Voice for oneself: Self-interested voice and its antecedents and consequences. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 94(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12334
  21. Erdogan, B., & Bauer, T. N. (2009). Perceived overqualification and its outcomes: The moderating role of empowerment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 557–565. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013528 Erdogan, B., & Bauer, T. N. (2021). Overqualification at work: A review and synthesis of the litera-ture. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 8, 259–283. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-055831
  22. Erdogan, B., Bauer, T. N., Peiro, J. M., & Truxillo, D. M. (2011). Overqualified employees: Making the best of a potentially bad situation for individuals and organizations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 4(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01330.x
  23. Erdogan, B., Karaeminogullari, A., Bauer, T. N., & Ellis, A. M. (2020). Perceived overqualification at work: Implications for extra-role behaviors and advice network centrality. Journal of Ma-nagement, 46(4), 583–606. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318804331
  24. Erdogan, B., Tomás, I., Valls, V., & Gracia, F. J. (2018). Perceived overqualification, relative depri-vation, and person-centric outcomes: The moderating role of career centrality. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 107, 233–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.05.003
  25. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202
  26. Fine, S. (2007). Overqualification and selection in leadership training. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 14(1), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071791907304291
  27. Fine, S., & Nevo, B. (2008). Too smart for their own good? A study of perceived cognitive overqualification in the workforce. The International Journal of Human Resource Mana-gement, 19(2), 346–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190701799937
  28. Finkelstein, L. M. (2011). Overqualified as a euphemism for too old? Industrial and Organizatio-nal Psychology, 4(2), 250–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01336.x
  29. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable vari-ables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  30. Fuller, C. M., Simmering, M. J., Atinc, G., Atinc, Y., & Babin, B. J. (2016). Common methods vari-ance detection in business research. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3192–3198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.008
  31. Goodman, P. S. (1974). An examination of referents used in the evaluation of pay. Organizatio-nal Behavior and Human Performance, 12(2), 170–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(74)90045-2
  32. Güvenç, İ. B. (2021). The impact of perceived relative deprivation on health-related outcomes: Mediating roles of locus of control and length of unemployment & moderating roles of dispositional optimism and perceived social support [Master's thesis, Middle East Techni-cal University].
  33. Harari, M. B., Manapragada, A., & Viswesvaran, C. (2017). Who thinks they're a big fish in a small pond and why does it matter? A meta-analysis of perceived overqualification. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 102, 28–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.06.002
  34. Hofmann, D. A., Griffin, M. A., & Gavin, M. B. (2000). The application of hierarchical linear mode-ling to organizational research. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 467–511). Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
  35. Jahantab, F. (2020). A social network perspective of employee overqualification to outcomes relationships in workgroups (Publication No. 27835320) [Doctoral dissertation, The Uni-versity of Texas at El Paso]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
  36. Jahantab, F., Erdogan, B., & Vidyarthi, P. R. (2024). Are we friends? Relative overqualification, citizenship, and the mediating role of friendship network centrality. Journal of Business and Psychology, 39(2), 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-023-09896-6
  37. Jahantab, F., Vidyarthi, P. R., Anand, S., & Erdogan, B. (2023). When are the bigger fish in the small pond better citizens? A multilevel examination of relative overqualification in workgroups. Group & Organization Management, 48(3), 874–907. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011211048055
  38. Ji, M., Liu, B., Li, H., Yang, S., & Li, Y. (2019). The effects of safety attitude and safety climate on flight attendants’ proactive personality with regard to safety behaviors. Journal of Air Transport Management, 78, 80–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2019.05.003
  39. Johnson, G. J., & Johnson, W. R. (1996). Perceived overqualification and psychological well-being. The Journal of Social Psychology, 136(4), 435–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1996.9714025
  40. Johnson, G. J., & Johnson, W. R. (2000). Perceived overqualification and dimensions of job satis-faction: A longitudinal analysis. The Journal of Psychology, 134(5), 537–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980009598235
  41. Khadivar, H., Fardnia, P., & Walker, T. (2025). Flying safe: The impact of corporate governance on aviation safety. Journal of Air Transport Management, 124, 102743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2025.102743 Kulik, C. T., & Ambrose, M. L. (1992). Personal and situational determinants of referent choice. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 212–237. https://doi.org/10.2307/258771
  42. Leary, M. R., Allen, A. B., & Terry, M. L. (2011). Managing social images in naturalistic versus labo-ratory settings: Implications for understanding and studying self-presentation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(4), 411–421. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.813 Lee, A. L., Erdogan, B., Tian, A., Willis, S., & Cao, J. (2021). Perceived overqualification and task performance: Reconciling two opposing pathways. Journal of Occupational and Organi-zational Psychology, 94(1), 80–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12323
  43. Li, C., Shi, H., Zhang, Y., Zhao, Y., Li, T., Zhou, L., Guan, Q., & Zhu, X. (2024). Association between perceived overqualification, work engagement, job satisfaction among nurses: A cross-sectional study. BMJ Open, 14(7), Article e081672. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081672
  44. Li, C. S., Liao, H. Y., & Han, Y. Q. (2022). I despise but also envy you: A dyadic investigation of per-ceived overqualification, perceived relative qualification, and knowledge hiding. Person-nel Psychology, 75(1), 91–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12444
  45. Li, Y., Li, Y., Yang, P. L., & Zhang, M. (2022). Perceived overqualification at work: Implications for voice toward peers and creative performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 835204. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.835204
  46. Li, Y., Wu, M. R., Li, N., & Zhang, M. (2019). Dual relational model of perceived overqualification: Employee's self-concept and task performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 27(4), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12261
  47. Liang, J., Farh, C. I. C., & Farh, J. L. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibiti-ve voice: A two-wave examination. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0176
  48. Liao, M. S., Zhang, M. J., Carnevale, J. B., Huang, C. Q., & Wang, L. (2024). Capable fish or defici-ent ponds? A meta-analysis of consequences, mechanisms, and moderators of perceived overqualification. Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063241239298
  49. Lin, B., Law, K. S., & Zhou, J. (2017). Why is underemployment related to creativity and OCB? A task-crafting explanation of the curvilinear moderated relations. Academy of Manage-ment Journal, 60(1), 156–177. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0470
  50. Lin, X., Wu, C.-H., Dong, Y., Chen, G. Z. X., Wei, W., & Duan, J. (2022). Psychological contract bre-ach and destructive voice: The mediating effect of relative deprivation and the modera-ting effect of leader emotional support. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 135, Article 103720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2022.103720
  51. Liu, S., & Wang, M. (2012). Perceived overqualification: A review and recommendations for rese-arch and practice. In P. L. Perrewé, J. R. B. Halbesleben, & C. C. Rosen (Eds.), The role of the economic crisis on occupational stress and well being (Vol. 10, pp. 1–42). Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-3555(2012)0000010005
  52. Luksyte, A., & Spitzmueller, C. (2016). When are overqualified employees creative? It depends on contextual factors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(5), 635–653. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2054
  53. Luksyte, A., Spitzmueller, C., & Maynard, D. C. (2011). Why do overqualified incumbents devia-te? Examining multiple mediators. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16(3), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022709
  54. Ma, C., Shang, S., Zhao, H., Zhong, J., & Chan, X. W. (2023). Speaking for organization or self? Investigating the effects of perceived overqualification on pro-organizational and self-interested voice. Journal of Business Research, 168, Article 114215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114215
  55. Macit, D., & Macit, A. (2017). Current situation of employment in civil aviation sector in Turkey, suggestions for solutions of problems and problems. Journal of Emerging Economies and Policy, 2(2), 74–85.
  56. Maden-Eyiusta, C. (2024). Perceived overqualification and employee proactivity: The cross-level moderation effects of LMX and initiative climate in small firms. Current Psychology, 43(8), 6890–6909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04844-2
  57. Maltarich, M. A., Reilly, G., & Nyberg, A. J. (2011). Objective and subjective overqualification: Distinctions, relationships, and a place for each in the literature. Industrial and Organiza-tional Psychology, 4(2), 236–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01332.x
  58. Maynard, D. C., Brondolo, E. M., Connelly, C. E., & Sauer, C. E. (2015). I'm too good for this job: Narcissism's role in the experience of overqualification. Applied Psychology, 64(1), 208–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12031
  59. Maynard, D. C., Joseph, T. A., & Maynard, A. M. (2006). Underemployment, job attitudes, and turnover intentions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(4), 509–536. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.389
  60. Maynes, T. D., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2014). Speaking more broadly: An examination of the nature, antecedents, and consequences of an expanded set of employee voice behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(1), 87–112. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034284
  61. Mogård, E. V., Rorstad, O. B., & Bang, H. (2023). The relationship between psychological safety and management team effectiveness: The mediating role of behavioral integration. Inter-national Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(1), Article 406. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010406
  62. Newton, D. W., Chamberlin, M., Maupin, C. K., Nahrgang, J. D., & Carter, D. R. (2022). Voice as a signal of human and social capital in team assembly decisions. Journal of Management, 48(8), 2255–2285. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211031303
  63. Nie, S.-t., & Liang, Z.-d. (2022). How relative deprivation affect employees' voice behavior—The role of core self-evaluation and psychological contract violation. Journal of Xihua Univer-sity (Philosophy & Social Sciences), 41(2), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.12189/j.issn.1672-8505.2022.02.009
  64. Pan, R., Hou, Z., Wang, D., & Liu, B. (2023). It is not bad to be the big fish in a small pond: Revisi-ting the double-edged sword model of college students’ perceived overqualification. Be-havioral Sciences, 13(7), Article 546. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13070546
  65. Pan, R. S., & Hou, Z. J. (2024). The relationship between objective overqualification, perceived overqualification and job satisfaction: Employment opportunity matters. Personnel Re-view, 53(8), 1925–1949. https://doi.org/10.1108/Pr-02-2023-0080
  66. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Jo-urnal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  67. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. SAGE.
  68. Rioux, C., Stickley, Z. L., Odejimi, O. A., & Little, T. D. (2020). Item parcels as indicators: Why, when, and how to use them in small sample research. In Small sample size solutions (pp. 203–214). Routledge.
  69. Rousseau, D. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452231594
  70. Rousseau, D. M. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee Respon-sibilities and Rights Journal, 2(2), 121–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384942
  71. Schreurs, B., Hamstra, M. R. W., Jawahar, I. M., & Akkermans, J. (2020). Perceived overqualifica-tion and counterproductive work behavior: Testing the mediating role of relative depriva-tion and the moderating role of ambition. Personnel Review, 50(3), 1038–1055. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-05-2019-0237
  72. Selimoglu, S. K., & Caliskan, A. O. (2018). Sustainability reporting in airlines industry: Evidence from Turkey. International Journal of Sustainable Aviation, 4(2), 114–132. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSA.2018.094224
  73. Shultz, K. S., Olson, D. A., & Wang, M. (2011). Overqualified employees: Perspectives of older workers. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 4(2), 247–249. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01335.x
  74. Sierra, M. J. (2011). A multilevel approach to understanding employee overqualification. Indust-rial and Organizational Psychology, 4(2), 243–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01334.x
  75. Smith, H., & Pettigrew, T. (2015). Advances in relative deprivation theory and research. Social Justice Research, 28, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-014-0231-5
  76. Smith, H. J., Pettigrew, T. F., Pippin, G. M., & Bialosiewicz, S. (2012). Relative deprivation: A theo-retical and meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(3), 203–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311430825
  77. Timmerman, T. A. (2005). Missing persons in the study of groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.306
  78. Vaisey, S. (2006). Education and its discontents: Overqualification in America, 1972–2002. Social Forces, 85(2), 835–864. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2007.0028
  79. van Dijk, H., Shantz, A., & Alfes, K. (2020). Welcome to the bright side: Why, how, and when overqualification enhances performance. Human Resource Management Review, 30(2), Article 100688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.04.004
  80. Van Dyne, L., Ang, S., & Botero, I. C. (2003). Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1359–1392. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00384
  81. Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 108–119. https://doi.org/10.2307/256902
  82. Warner, R. M., Kenny, D. A., & Stoto, M. (1979). A new round robin analysis of variance for social interaction data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(10), 1742–1757. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.10.1742
  83. Woltman, H., Feldstain, A., MacKay, J. C., & Rocchi, M. (2012). An introduction to hierarchical linear modeling. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8(1), 52–69. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.08.1.p052
  84. Wu, S. X., Kee, D. M. H., Wu, W., Ni, D., & Deng, H. (2022). Challenging your boss with safe words: Newcomers' voice, supervisors' responses, and socialization outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 138, Article 103772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2022.103772
  85. Wu, X., & Ma, F. (2022). How Chinese employees’ voice behavior is motivated: The role of percei-ved overqualification. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 736043. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.736043
  86. Xiao, L., & Wang, Y. (2021). Perceived over-qualification and job satisfaction of new graduates: A moderated mediation model. Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Inno-vative Management and Economics (ISIME 2021).
  87. Zhang, H., Li, L., Shan, X., & Chen, A. (2022). Do overqualified employees hide knowledge? The mediating role of psychological contract breach. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 842725. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.842725
  88. Zhang, W., Yan, Z. Y., W, B., Qu, Y., & Qian, J. (2022). Perceived overqualification and job crafting: The mediating role of workplace anxiety and moderating role of reappraisal. Sage Open, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221103522
  89. Zhou, Q. W., & Chen, K. Y. (2022). Exploring the impact of leader humility on different types of voice: The role of employee other-oriented motivations. Journal of Management & Or-ganization, 30(5), 1324-1343.https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2022.41