Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2014 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 4

Teachers’ Computer Self-Efficacy And Their Use Of Educational Technology

Pages
130–149
Publication Date
2014-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There are also statistical differences between; Ø their computer self-efficacy perceptions, Ø frequency of computer use for certain purposes, and Ø computer level in certain programs in terms of different independent variables.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examined the use of educational technology by primary and subject teachers (i.e. secondary and high school teachers) in a small town in the eastern part of Turkey in the spring of 2012.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, all primary, secondary and high school teachers in the small town were given the questionnaires to complete. 158 teachers (n=158) completed and returned them.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There are also statistical differences between; Ø their computer self-efficacy perceptions, Ø frequency of computer use for certain purposes, and Ø computer level in certain programs in terms of different independent variables.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Teachers · Educational Technology · Information And Communication Technology (ICT)

Abstract

This study examined the use of educational technology by primary and subject teachers (i.e. secondary and high school teachers) in a small town in the eastern part of Turkey in the spring of 2012. The study examined the primary, secondary and high school teachers’ Ø personal and computer related (demographic) characteristics, Ø their computer self-efficacy perceptions, Ø their computer-using level in certain software, Ø their frequency of computer use for teaching, administrative and communication objectives, and Ø their use of educational technology preferences for preparation and teaching purposes. In this study, all primary, secondary and high school teachers in the small town were given the questionnaires to complete. 158 teachers (n=158) completed and returned them. The study was mostly quantitative and partly qualitative. The quantitative results were analysed with SPSS (i.e. mean, Std. Deviation, frequency, percentage, ANOVA). The qualitative data were analysed with examining the participants’ responses gathered from the open-ended questions and focussing on the shared themes among the responses. The results reveal that the teachers think that they have good computer self-efficacy perceptions, their level in certain programs is good, and they often use computers for a wide range of purposes. There are also statistical differences between; Ø their computer self-efficacy perceptions, Ø frequency of computer use for certain purposes, and Ø computer level in certain programs in terms of different independent variables.

🔖

Cite This Article

TUREL, V. (2014). Teachers’ Computer Self-Efficacy And Their Use Of Educational Technology. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 4, 130–149. https://ajindex.com/articles/140427

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Ajjan, H. & Hartshorne. R. (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. The Internet and Higher Education.11(2). 71-80.
  2. Akkoyunlu, B. (2002). Öğretmenlerin internet kullanımı ve bu konudaki öğretmen Görüşleri [Use of Internet by teachers and their opinions on the issue]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Hacettepe University Journal of Education]. 22. 1-8.
  3. Albion. P. (2001). Some factors in the development of self-efficacy beliefs for computer use among teacher education students. Journal of Technology & Teacher Education. 9(3). 321 Altun, A.; & Çakan. M. (2006) Undergraduate students' academic achievement. Field dependent/independent cognitive styles and attitude toward computers. Educational Technology & Society. 9(1). 289-297.
  4. Askar, P.; & Umay. A. (2001). İlköğretim Matematik öğretmenliği öğrencilerinin bilgisayarla ilgili öz-yeterlilik algısı [Perceived computer self-efficacy of the students in the elementary mathematics teaching programme]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Hacettepe University Journal of Education].21. 1-8.
  5. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman. Balasubramanian, K. Clark-Okah, W.; Daniel. J.; Fereira. F.; Kanwar. A.; Kwan. A. et.al. (2009). ICTs for higher education: Background paper from the Commonwealth of Learning. Paris: UNESCO. Available online from and Retrieved on 10 January 2014. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0018/001832/183207e.pdf Becta, (Leading Next Generation Learning). (2009). Harnessing technology for next generation learning: Children. Schools and families implementation plan 2009–2012. [Available from and retrieved on 15 January 2014. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20101102103654/http://publications.becta. org.uk/download.cfm?resID=39547 Bilge, F. (2012). Bir grup ilköğretim öğrencisinde bilgisayara yönelik bağımlılık eğilimi Değerlendirmesi [Evaluation of computer addiction tendencies in a group of primary students]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Hacettepe University Journal of Education]. 43. 96- Buchanan, T.; Sainter. P.; & Saunders, G. (2013). Factors affecting faculty use of learning technologies: implications for models of technology adoption. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. 25. 1–11.
  6. Cassidy, S.; & Eachus. P. (2002). Developing the computer user self-efficacy (CUSE) scale Investigating the relationship between computer self-efficacy. gender and