Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2014 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 4

A Case Study On Student Satisfaction For Graduates Of The German Language Teachers’ Blended Ma Program Of The Hellenic Open University, Classes Of 2012 And 2013

Pages
48–74
Publication Date
2014-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Survey results on a case study population show that, even though the overall program seems to be appreciated, there are vast sections of the blended program that do not completely fulfill the expectations of the students.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper addresses the lack of research into satisfaction assessment of post-graduate students of the Blended Distance Learning Master’s Course for Teachers of German as a Foreign Language offered by the Hellenic Open University.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Through the compilation of previous questionnaires implemented for other DL programs and newly defined research problems in one online survey tool, this paper seeks to pin-point the correlation of initial expectance and final assessment of the blended course.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Survey results on a case study population show that, even though the overall program seems to be appreciated, there are vast sections of the blended program that do not completely fulfill the expectations of the students.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Distance Learning · Hellenic Open University · satisfaction

Abstract

This paper addresses the lack of research into satisfaction assessment of post-graduate students of the Blended Distance Learning Master’s Course for Teachers of German as a Foreign Language offered by the Hellenic Open University. Through the compilation of previous questionnaires implemented for other DL programs and newly defined research problems in one online survey tool, this paper seeks to pin-point the correlation of initial expectance and final assessment of the blended course. Survey results on a case study population show that, even though the overall program seems to be appreciated, there are vast sections of the blended program that do not completely fulfill the expectations of the students. Furthermore, a need for further investigation and cross-referencing with respective studies is pointed out.

🔖

Cite This Article

ZEPPOS, D. (2014). A Case Study On Student Satisfaction For Graduates Of The German Language Teachers’ Blended Ma Program Of The Hellenic Open University, Classes Of 2012 And 2013. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 4, 48–74. https://ajindex.com/articles/140418

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Abu-Al-Aish, A., & Love, S. (2013). Factors Influencing Students ’ Acceptance of M Learning: An Investigation in Higher Education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(5), 82–106.
  2. Adas, D., & Shmais, W. A. (2011). Students’ Perceptions Towards Blended Learning Environment Using the OCC. An - Najah Univ. J. Res. (Humanities)., 25(6), 1681–1710.
  3. Bergamin, P. B., Werlen, E., Siegenthaler, E., & Ziska, S. (2012). The Relationship between Flexible and Self-Regulated Learning in Open and Distance Universities. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13, 101–123.
  4. Bird, J., & Morgan, C. (2003). Adults Contemplating University Study at a Distance: Issues, themes and concerns. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(1), 1–11.
  5. Boone, H. N. J., & Boone, D. A. (2012). Analyzing Likert Data. Journal of Extension, 50(2), 30. Brown, J. D. (2011). Likert items and scales of measurement? JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 15(March), 10–24.
  6. Clason, D., & Dormody, T. (1994). Analyzing data measured by individual Likert-type items. Journal of Agricultural Education, 35(4), 31–35.
  7. Dahalan, N., Hasmawati, H., & Hanafi, A. (2012). Student Engagement in Online Learning: Learners Attitude Toward E-Mentoring. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67(November 2011), 464–475.
  8. Evans, J. R., & Mathur, A. (2005). The value of online surveys. Internet Research, 15(2), 195–219.
  9. Frary, R. B. (1996). Hints for Designing Effective Questionnaires. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 5(3), 1–5.
  10. Gadermann, A. M., Guhn, M., & Zumbo, B. D. (2012). Estimating ordinal reliability for Likert-type and ordinal item response data: A conceptual, empirical, and practical guide. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17(3). Giannousi, M., Vernadakis, N., Derri, V., Michalopoulos, M., & Kioumourtzoglou, E. (2009). Students’ satisfaction from blended learning instruction. In TCC (pp. 61–68).
  11. Komotini, Greece: Department of Physical Education & Sport Science. Gibbs, G. (2010). Does assessment in open learning support students? Open Learning: The Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 25(2), 163–166.
  12. Grosshans, W., & Chelimsky, E. (1993). Developing and Using Questionnaires. United States General Accounting Office (GAO). Hitchcock, A., & Porter, K. (2004). The Likert Scale. Methodology, 7–10.
  13. Islam, T. (2011).
  14. Cost-Effective, Equitable and Flexible Higher Education through Open and Distance Le