Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2008 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

Perceptions of Course Coordinators and Course Writers for Developing Distance Learning Material

Aldwin G. LAURON Ph.D. Candidate School of Policy Studies, Education and Management Mindanao Polytechnic State College Cagayan de Oro City , PHILIPPINES

Pages
109–122
Publication Date
2008-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The study indicates the areas where contradiction is found among perceptions of a sample of seventy course coordinators and seventy course writes of Allama Iqbal Open University, Pakistan through a self developed questionnaire covering preparation, implementation and execution aspects of course development process.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main aim of this research is to better understand and draw perceptions of course writers and course coordinators towards the process of developing distance learning material.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For developing good self-instructional material cooperative efforts among course development personnel are essential.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The study indicates the areas where contradiction is found among perceptions of a sample of seventy course coordinators and seventy course writes of Allama Iqbal Open University, Pakistan through a self developed questionnaire covering preparation, implementation and execution aspects of course development process.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Distance Learning Material · Course Writers · Course Coordinators

Abstract

The main aim of this research is to better understand and draw perceptions of course writers and course coordinators towards the process of developing distance learning material. For developing good self-instructional material cooperative efforts among course development personnel are essential. The study indicates the areas where contradiction is found among perceptions of a sample of seventy course coordinators and seventy course writes of Allama Iqbal Open University, Pakistan through a self developed questionnaire covering preparation, implementation and execution aspects of course development process.

🔖

Cite This Article

YOUSUF, M. İ., ANWAR, M. N., SARWAR, M. (2008). Perceptions of Course Coordinators and Course Writers for Developing Distance Learning Material. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 109–122. https://ajindex.com/articles/140370

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. E-mai: [email protected] Argyle, M. Cooperation in working groups. Cooperation: The Basis of Sociability, 115– London: Rutledge, 1991.
  2. Argote, L. D. Gruenfeld, and C. Naquin. Group learning in organizations. In M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at Work: Theory and Research, 369–411.
  3. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2001.
  4. Chidambaram, L. and R. P. Bostrom. Group development (I): A review and synthesis of developmental models. Group Decision and Negotiation 6(2): 59–187, 1997.
  5. Cook, S. D. N, and J. S. Brown. Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science 10(4): –400, 1999.
  6. Daniel, J. S. (1995). The mega-universities and the knowledge media: implications of new technologies for large distance teaching universities. Unpublished Master of Arts thesis, Concordia University, Montreal. Dede, C., Emerging Technologies in Distance Education for Business, Journal of Education for Business, Vol. 71, No. 4, 1996.
  7. Dillenbourg, P., & Schneider, D. (1995). Collaborative learning and the internet, Online document]. Available: http://tecfa.unige.ch/tecfa/research/CMC/colla/iccai95_1.html [1998, 18 August]. Harasim, L, Hiltz, S., Teles, L., & Turoff, M., Learning Networks, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, p. 30, 1995.
  8. Hiltz, S., Collaborative Learning in Asynchronous Learning Networks: Building Learning Communities, Web 98 Symposium, Orlando, Florida, 1998.
  9. Henri, F., & Rigault, C. R. (1996). Collaborative distance learning and computer conferencing. In T. T. Liao (Ed.), Advanced educational technology: Research issues and future technologies (pp. 45-76). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. JALN Volume 5, Issue 1 - February 2001 33 Haythornthwaite, C. Communicating Knowledge: Articulating Divides in Distributed Knowledge Practice. International Communication Assoc., New Orleans, LA, 2004.
  10. Jarvis, P., Adult Learning in the Social Context, London, Croon-Helm, 1987.
  11. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1996). Cooperation and the use of technology. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 1017-1044). New York: Simon and Schuster Macmillan. Johnson, D. W., R. T. Johnson and K. A. Smith. Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company, 1991.
  12. Goldenberg, J., Virtual Learning Communities: A Student's Perspective, Journal of Instruction Delivery Systems, Vol. 13, No. 2, 1999.
  13. Gunawardena, C., N., Lowe, C., A., & Anderson, T. (1997). An