A New Restricted Model Using Correlation Coefficients as an Alternative to Cross-efficiency Evaluation in Data Envelopment Analysis

References (22)

1. Andersen, P. and Petersen, N. C. A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis, Management Science 39, 1261–1264, 1993.
2. Anderson, T. R., Hollingsworth, K. and Inman, L. The fixed weighting nature of a cross- evaluation model, Journal of Productivity Analysis 17, 249–255, 2002.
3. Boussofiane, A., Dyson, R. G. and Thanassoulis, E. Applied data envelopment analysis, European Journal of Operational Research 52, 1–15, 1991.
4. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W. and Rhodes, E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research 2, 429–444, 1978.
5. Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M. and Tone, K. Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software, second ed., (Springer Science & Business Publishers, New York, 2007).
6. Despotis, D. K. Improving the discriminating power of DEA: Focus on globally efficient units, Journal of the Operational Research Society 53, 314–323, 2002.
7. Doyle, J. and Green, R. Efficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA; Derivations, meanings and uses, Journal of The Operational Research Society 45, 567–578, 1994.
8. Jahanshahloo, G. R., Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F., Jafari, Y. and Maddahi, R. Selecting symmet- ric weights as a secondary goal in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation, Applied Mathematical Modelling 35, 544–549, 2011.
9. Lam, K. F. In the determination of weight sets to compute cross-efficiency ratios in DEA, Journal of the Operational Research Society 61, 134–143, 2010.
10. Liang, L., Wu, J., Cook, W. and Zhu, J. Alternative secondary goals in DEA cross efficiency evaluation, Int. J. Production Economics 113, 1025–1030, 2008.
11. Ram´on, N., Ruiz, J. L. and Sirvent, I. A multiplier bound approach to assess relative ef- ficiency in DEA without slacks, European Journal of Operational Research 203, 261–269, 2010.
12. Ram´on, N., Ruiz, J. L. and Sirvent, I. On the choice of weights profiles in cross-efficiency evaluations, European Journal of Operational Research 207, 1564–1572, 2010.
13. Roll, Y. and Golany, B. Alternate methods of treating factor weights in DEA, Omega 21, 99–109, 1993.
14. Sexton, T. R., Silkman, R. H. and Hogan, A. J. Data envelopment analysis: Critique and ex- tensions, in R. H Silkman (Ed.), Measuring Efficiency: An assessment of Data Envelopment Analysis, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 32, 73–105, 1986.
15. Sherman, H. D. Data envelopment analysis as a new managerial audit methodology- test and evaluation, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 4, 35–53, 1984.
16. Thanassoulis, E. A comparison of regression analysis and data envelopment analysis as al- ternative methods for performance assessments, Journal of the Operational Research Society 44, 1129–1144, 1993.
17. Thompson, R. G., Singleton, F. D., Thrall, R. M. and Smith, B. A. Comparative site evalu- ations for locating a high-energy physics lab in Texas, Interfaces 16, 35–49, 1986.
18. Wang, Y. M. and Chin, K. S. A neutral DEA model for cross-efficiency evaluation and its extension, Expert Systems with Applications 37, 3666–3675, 2010.
19. Wu, J., Liang, L. and Yang, F. Determination of the weights for the ultimate cross efficiency using Shapley value in cooperative game, Expert Systems with Applications 36, 872–876, 2009.
20. Wu, J., Liang, L. and Yang, F. Determination of cross-efficiency under the principle of ranking priority in cross-evaluation, Expert Systems with Applications 36, 4826–4829, 2009. [21] Wu, J., Liang, L. and Zha, Y. Preference voting and ranking using DEA game cross effi- ciency model, Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan 52, 105–111, 2009.
21. Wu, J., Sun, J., Liang, L. and Zha, Y. Determination of weights for ultimate cross efficiency using Shannon entropy, Expert Systems with Applications 38, 5162–5165, 2011.
22. Liang, L., Wu, J., Cook, W. and Zhu, J. Alternative secondary goals in DEA cross efficiency evaluation, Int. J. Production Economics 113, 1025–1030, 2008.