Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2019 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 4

Why Does Collaborative Learning Not Always Work Even When the Appropriate Tools Are Available?

Pages
11–30
Publication Date
2019-10-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

They also reported lack of awareness of the benefits of CL and difficulty in finding time due to family and professional commitment as some of the obstacles to CL.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Today, more and more working adults are opting for the Open Distance Learning (ODL) mode to pursue their tertiary studies as it offers them the flexibility to study anywhere, any time and at one’s own pace.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Collaborative Learning (CL) can help overcome this isolation and boost learning performance.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:They also reported lack of awareness of the benefits of CL and difficulty in finding time due to family and professional commitment as some of the obstacles to CL.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Collaborative learning · technological tools · group work

Abstract

Today, more and more working adults are opting for the Open Distance Learning (ODL) mode to pursue their tertiary studies as it offers them the flexibility to study anywhere, any time and at one’s own pace. But studying at a distance can be problematic for many learners, with the absence of regular traditional face-to-face sessions. Some find it difficult to adapt to this new learning environment and become easily isolated. Collaborative Learning (CL) can help overcome this isolation and boost learning performance. To investigate the implications of CL in the ODL environment, a study was conducted with 155 learners at the Open University of Mauritius. The study revealed that at least one third of the respondents were not participating in CL and were thus missing on the benefits of “learning together”. The others had adopted CL to understand the course content, discuss assignments and get better marks. This study also showed that tutors’ role was vital in encouraging learners delve in CL. Respondents deplored the lack of appropriate infrastructure and meeting places to hold CL meetings. They also reported lack of awareness of the benefits of CL and difficulty in finding time due to family and professional commitment as some of the obstacles to CL.

🔖

Cite This Article

APPAVOO, P., SUKON, K. S., GOKHOOL, A. C., GOORIA, V. (2019). Why Does Collaborative Learning Not Always Work Even When the Appropriate Tools Are Available?. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 4, 11–30. https://ajindex.com/articles/140335

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Amry, B. A. (2014). The impact of WhatsApp mobile social learning on the achievement and attitudes of female learners compared with face to face learning in the classroom. European Scientific Journal, 10(22), 116-136.
  2. Brame, C. (2016). Active learning. Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching. Retrieved 08.08.18 from https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/active-learning/.
  3. Brindley, J.E., Walti, C. & Blaschke, L.M. (2009). Creating effective collaborative learning groups in an online environment. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Leaning, 10 (3). Chan, L. (2005). WebCT revolutionized e-learning. UBC Reports, 51(7). Colbeck, C.L., Campbell, S.E., & Bjorklund, S.A. (2000). Grouping in the Dark: What college students learn from group projects? The Journal of Higher Education. 71(1), 60-83
  4. Cole, J. (2005). Using Moodle: Teaching with the Popular Open Source Course Management System. Sebastopol: O’ Reilly Community Press.
  5. Curtis, D. D., & Lawson, M. J. (2001). Exploring Collaborative Online Learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(1), 21-34.
  6. De Jong, N., Krumeich, J. S. M., & Verstegen, D. M. L. (2016). To what extent can PBL principles be applied in blended learning: Lessons learned from health master programmes. Medical Teacher, 39(2), 203-211. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2016.1248915 Delucchi, M. (2006). The efficacy of collaborative learning groups in an undergraduate statistics course. College Teach, 54(2), 244-248.
  7. Dewiyanti, S., Brand-Gruwel, S., Jochems, W., & Broers, N.J. (2007). Learners’ experiences with collaborative learning in asynchronous computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Computers in Human Behaviour, 23, 496-514.
  8. Dirkx, J. M., & Smith, R.O. (2008). Collaborative Learning: Two perspectives on theory and practice. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/497/1043
  9. Dornyei, Z. (2001). Teaching and researching motivation. In N. Christopher, & R. David (Eds.), Applied linguistics in action series. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited. 28 Eggen, P., & Kauchak, D. (2001). Educational psychology: Windows on classrooms (5th ed.). New Jersey, OH: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall. Eichler, G. (2003). E-Learning and communities, supporting the circulation of knowledge pieces. Innovative Internet Community Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2877, 48-64.
  10. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  11. Frankola, K. (2001). Why online learners