Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2019 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 4

Survival and Risk Analysis in MOOCS

Pages
149–159
Publication Date
2019-10-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Possible strategies to reduce the desertion behavior at MOOCs are discussed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The most significant disadvantage in the use of MOOCs is their high drop out rates, which reaches between 88.3% and 90%.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This research examined the desertion from 15 MOOCs, the following factors and their relation to desertion were assessed, characteristics of the students (gender, language, educational level, age, interest in the final certificate) and aspects of the courses (data lost at the time of registration, duration of the MOOC, course discipline, number of total questions and by evaluation).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Possible strategies to reduce the desertion behavior at MOOCs are discussed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:MOOC · desertion · survival analysis

Abstract

The most significant disadvantage in the use of MOOCs is their high drop out rates, which reaches between 88.3% and 90%. This research examined the desertion from 15 MOOCs, the following factors and their relation to desertion were assessed, characteristics of the students (gender, language, educational level, age, interest in the final certificate) and aspects of the courses (data lost at the time of registration, duration of the MOOC, course discipline, number of total questions and by evaluation). The results, based on survival analysis, indicate the probability of desertion is the highest on the first and last weeks of the MOOC. Our findings show that the probability of dropout is affected by the number of questions in each evaluation, the educational level of the participants, their age and their interest in the certificate. Missing data in the registration form was found to be associated with desertion being a significant pre-dictor of risk of quitting. Finally, the lack of interest in the certificate was found to be a predictor of the highest risk of dropping out. Possible strategies to reduce the desertion behavior at MOOCs are discussed.

🔖

Cite This Article

LABRADOR, M. M., VARGAS, G. R. G., ALVARADO, J., CAICEDO, M. (2019). Survival and Risk Analysis in MOOCS. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 4, 149–159. https://ajindex.com/articles/140334

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Adamopoulos, P. (2013, Diciembre ). What Makes a Great MOOC? An Interdisciplinary Analysis of Student Retention in Online Courses. Paper presented at the Thirty Fourth Interna-tional Conference on Information Systems, 1–21.Milan, Italy. Angelino, L. M., Williams, F. K., & Natvig, D. (2007). Strategies to engage online students and reduce attrition rates. Journal of Educators Online, 4(2), 1-14. Recuperado de https://files.eric.ed.gov/ fulltext/EJ907749.pdf Allison, P. D. (2014). Event history and survival analysis: Regression for longitudinal event data (Vol.46). London: SAGE publications. Berge, Z. L., & Huang, Y. P. (2004). 13: 5 A Model for Sustainable Student Retention: A Holistic Perspective on the Student Dropout Problem with Special Attention to e-Learning. Doesnews (online), 13(5). Recuperado de www. re-searchgate.net/profile/Zane_Berge/publication/237429805. Carey, K. (2012). Into the future with MOOCs. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 59(2),29. Re-cuperado de https://www.chronicle.com/article/Into-the-Future-With-MOOCs/134080
  2. Chang, J. W., & Wei, H. Y. (2016). Exploring Engaging Gamification Mechanics in Mas-sive Online Open Courses. Educational Technology & Society, 19 (2), 177–203. Retrieved from [J]2015_Exploring%20 Engaging%20Gamification%20Mechanics%20in%20Massive%20Online%20Open%20Course. pdf Chiappe-Laverde, A., Hine, N., & Martinez-Silva, J. A. (2015). Literatura y practica: una revision critica acerca de los MOOC. Comunicar, 22(44). doi 10.3916/C44-2015-01
  3. Ferschke, O., Yang, D., Tomar, G., & Rose, C. P. (2015, June). Positive impact of collaborative chat participation in an edX MOOC. Trabajo presentado en International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, 115-124. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-19773-9_12 158 Greene, JA, Oswald, CA, y Pomerantz, J. (2015). Predictors of Retention and Achievement in a Massive Open Online Course. American Educational Research Diario, 52, 925-955. doi: 10.3102/0002831215584621 Gomez-ZermeNo, M., & Aleman De la Garza, L. (2016). Research Analysis On Mooc Course Dropout And Retention Rates. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE. 17(2), 3-11. doi: 10.17718/tojde.23429 Gomez, G., & Langohr, K. (2004). Hablemos de… Analisis de supervivencia. GH continuada, 3(4), 51-57.
  4. Gütl, C., Chang, V., Hernandez Rizzardini, R., & Morales, M. (2014). Must we be concerned with the Massive Drop-outs in MOOC? - An Attrition Analysis of Open Courses.(561533-EPP-1-2015-1- ES-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP). En memorias de