Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2019 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 4

The Effect of A Flipped Classroom on Students’ Achievements, Academic Engagement and Satisfaction Levels

Pages
31–60
Publication Date
2019-10-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that the scores for the students in the experimental groups with regard to academic achievement and engagement were higher than the scores for those in the control group and the differences between the groups were statistically significant.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, a flipped classroom was compared with blended learning and face-to-face learning environments and the aim was to identify the effect of these learning environments on students’ achievements, academic engagement and satisfaction levels.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It was found that the scores for the students in the experimental groups with regard to academic achievement and engagement were higher than the scores for those in the control group and the differences between the groups were statistically significant.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was revealed that the students were also generally satisfied with the flipped classroom.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Flipped classroom · blended learning · online learning

Abstract

In this study, a flipped classroom was compared with blended learning and face-to-face learning environments and the aim was to identify the effect of these learning environments on students’ achievements, academic engagement and satisfaction levels. Based on this aim, one control and two experimental groups were formed. The students in Experiment-I learned the theoretical aspect of the course through the materials in the online learning environment which were prepared prior to the class study time in context with the “flipped classroom”. The students in Experiment-II learned the theoretical aspect of the course in the classroom in accordance with the blended learning model and fulfilled active learning activities out of class study time. The students in the control group learned the theoretical aspect of the course in the classroom according to the current curriculum and conducted active learning activities at their homes. It was found that the scores for the students in the experimental groups with regard to academic achievement and engagement were higher than the scores for those in the control group and the differences between the groups were statistically significant. It was revealed that the students were also generally satisfied with the flipped classroom.

🔖

Cite This Article

TALAN, T., GULSECEN, S. (2019). The Effect of A Flipped Classroom on Students’ Achievements, Academic Engagement and Satisfaction Levels. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 4, 31–60. https://ajindex.com/articles/140330

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 1-14.
  2. Akbulut, E. (2010). Levels of the empathic tendencies of classroom teachers. [Sinif Ogretmenlerinin Empatik Egilim Duzeyleri.] Unpublished Master Thesis. [Yayinlanmamis Yuksek Lisans Tezi.] Sakarya University. [Sakarya Universitesi.] AlJaser, A. M. (2017). Effectiveness of Using Flipped Classroom Strategy in Academic Achievement and Self-Efficacy among Education Students of Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University. English Language Teaching, 10(4), 67. Arshad, K., & Imran, M. A. (2013). Increasing the interaction time in a lecture by integrating flipped classroom and just-in-time teaching concepts. Compass: Journal of Learning and Teaching, 4(7). Ary, D., Jacobs, L.C., Sorensen, C.K., & Razavieh, A. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning. Asef-Vaziri, A. (2015). The Flipped Classroom of Operations Management: A Not‐For‐Cost‐Reduction Platform. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 13(1), 71-89.
  3. Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25, 297-307. 56 Atwa, Z. M., Din, R., & Hussin, M. (2017). Effectiveness of Flipped Learning in Physics Education on Palestinian High School Students’ Achievement. Journal of Personalized Learning, 2(1), 73-85.
  4. Aydin, B. (2016). The effects of flipped classroom model on academic achievement, homework/task stress level and transfer of learning. [Ters Yuz Sinif Modelinin Akademik Basari, Odev/Gorev Stres Duzeyi ve Ogrenme Transferi Uzerindeki Etkisi.] Unpublished Master Thesis. [Yayinlanmamis Yuksek Lisans Tezi.] Suleyman Demirel University. [Suleyman Demirel Universitesi.] Baker, J. (2000). The ‘classroom flip’: Using web course management tools to become the guide by the side. 11th international conference on College Teaching and Learning, Jacksonville, FL. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Washington: International Society for Technology in Education. Bergmann, J., Overmyer, J., & Wilie, B. (2013). The flipped class: What it is and what it is not. The Daily Riff, 9. Bhagat, K. K., Chang, C. N., & Chang, C. Y. (2016). The impact of the flipped classroom on mathematics concept learning in high school. Educational