Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2010 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2

Not Too Distant: A Survey Of Strategies For Teacher Support In Distance Education Programs

Pages
108–117
Publication Date
2010-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Because of the diversity of distance-education programs, the paper includes a range of such modalities (print-based instruction, radio, television, and online learning).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Distance learning can be a “very lonely” experience (Brown & Early, cited by Prescott & Robinson, 1993).
📊
Key Findings & Data:This isolation exacerbates all of the many issues that can occur when learners are separated from their instructor and other learners via distance.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Because of the diversity of distance-education programs, the paper includes a range of such modalities (print-based instruction, radio, television, and online learning).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Supports For Distance Learners · Follow-Up Support · Online Professional Development

Abstract

Distance learning can be a “very lonely” experience (Brown & Early, cited by Prescott & Robinson, 1993). This isolation exacerbates all of the many issues that can occur when learners are separated from their instructor and other learners via distance. Difficulties understanding content, computer problems, uncertainty about how to employ a strategy, and disappointment when a new pedagogical approach fails are all magnified when teachers confront these issues alone. High rates of attrition in distance-based teacher training courses are in large measure due to these feelings of isolation and “anonymity” (Potashnik & Capper, 1998; Hope, 2006). Indeed, without “support, contact and confidence,” distance learning is not considered by learners to be “valuable” (Brown & Early, 1990; Prescott & Robinson, 1993, p. 306). This paper presents a recent historical and global overview of the types of supports provided to distance education programs across the globe. Because of the diversity of distance-education programs, the paper includes a range of such modalities (print-based instruction, radio, television, and online learning).

🔖

Cite This Article

BURNS, M. (2010). Not Too Distant: A Survey Of Strategies For Teacher Support In Distance Education Programs. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 108–117. https://ajindex.com/articles/140315

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Abrioux, D.A.M.X. (2006). Strategic issues in single- and dual-mode distance education: The organizational blending of two Canadian distance universities. Vancouver: Commonwealth of Learning. http://www.col.org/colweb/site/pid/3974
  2. Retrieved, July, 2009.
  3. Brennan, J. & Shah, T. (Eds). (2000). Managing quality in higher education. (Milton Keynes, OECD, SRHE & Open University Press). Burns, M. (Forthcoming, 2010). Modes, models and methods of distance education: A global perspective. Washington, DC: Education Development Center. Burns, M. (June 2009). Threading, tagging and higher order thinking: Using Web 2.0 applications with Indonesian teacher trainers. In eLearn Magazine. http://www.elearnmag.org/subpage.cfm?section=case_studies&article=43-1
  4. Retrieved, October 31, 2009.
  5. Burns, M. & Dimock, K.V. (2007). Technology as a catalyst for school communities: Beyond boxes and bandwidth. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Center for Children and Technology. (2008). Online professional development formative research report—report to the Public Broadcasting Corporation (New York, Education Development Center). Commonwealth of Learning. (2008). Education for a digital world: Advice, guidelines and effective practice from around the globe. Vancouver: Author. Retrieved, July 22, 2009 from: http://www.col.org/colweb/site/pid/5312
  6. Dimock, K. V., Burns, M. & Heath, M. (2000). Applying technology to restructuring and learning: How teachers use computers in technology assisted, constructivist learning environments. (Austin, TX, Southwest Educational Development Laboratory) Gaible, E. & Burns, M. (2007). Using technology to train teachers: Appropriate uses of ICTs for professional development. Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved, July 22, from: http://www.infodev.org/en/Publication.13.html
  7. Holmes, D.R., Karmacharya, D.M. & Mayo, J.K. (1993). Radio education in Nepal, in H. Perraton (Ed) Distance Education for Teacher Training (London, Routledge Press), 136- Hope, A. (2006). Factors for success in dual mode institutions, Vancouver, Commonwealth of Learning. Hord, S., Rutherford, W.L., Huling-Austin, L. & Hall, G.E. (1987). Taking charge of change. (Austin, TX, Southwest Educational Development Laboratory). McGhee, P. (March 2002). Web-based learning design: Planning for diversity, in United States Distance Learning Association Journal, (16), 3. Retrieved, July 22, 2009 from: http://www.usdla.org/html/journal/MAR02_Issue/article03.html National Commission on Teaching and Amer