Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2019 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2

Using Blended Learning in Postgraduate Applied Statistics Programs

Pages
64–77
Publication Date
2019-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The authors make the case that implementation of a successful blended learning model can enhance students’ learning experience for a mixed cohort of participants.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Blended learning refers to a method of teaching and learning in which some form of online learning is used in addition to the traditional on-campus/face-to-face learning experience in an integrated manner.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Postgraduate Applied Statistics programs at Swinburne University of Technology, Australia adopted the blended learning paradigm almost a decade ago to accommodate an increasingly diverse student population.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The authors make the case that implementation of a successful blended learning model can enhance students’ learning experience for a mixed cohort of participants.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Blended learning · post graduate · applied statistics

Abstract

Blended learning refers to a method of teaching and learning in which some form of online learning is used in addition to the traditional on-campus/face-to-face learning experience in an integrated manner. Postgraduate Applied Statistics programs at Swinburne University of Technology, Australia adopted the blended learning paradigm almost a decade ago to accommodate an increasingly diverse student population. This paradigm allows for flexibility in design approaches, and accommodates the range of blended learning capabilities and experience of teachers and learners. The blended learning design adopted in these programs has involved the thoughtful integration of learning and teaching approaches in both on-campus, face-to-face and online/virtual learning environments by utilising the benefits of each of these environments. These programs focus on designing learning interactions across formal teaching spaces, informal learning spaces and online learning and teaching spaces. This flexible approach has been well accepted among both online and on-campus students. This paper describes the medium impact blended learning model adopted in these courses and the feedback received from students during recent study periods. The authors make the case that implementation of a successful blended learning model can enhance students’ learning experience for a mixed cohort of participants.

🔖

Cite This Article

BHOWMIK, J., MEYER, D., PHILLIPS, B. (2019). Using Blended Learning in Postgraduate Applied Statistics Programs. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 2, 64–77. https://ajindex.com/articles/140280

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Ambient Insight (2011). Learning and performance technology research taxonomy. Monroe, WA: Ambient Insight. http://www.ambientinsight.com/Resources/Documents/ AmbientInsight_Learning_Technology_Taxonomy.pdf Alammary, A., Sheard, J., & Carbone, A. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Three different design approaches. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(4), 440-454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.693
  2. Allam, C. (2006) in Bijnens, M., Vanbuel, M., Verstegen, S., & Young C., Handbook on Digital Video and Audio in Education, Creating and using audio and video material for educational purposes. The Videoaktiv Project. DOI: https://elbd.sites.uu.nl/wpcontent/uploads/sites/108/2017/05/2184_9_VideoAktivHandbookfin.pdf
  3. Aycock, A., Garnham, C., & Kaleta, R. (2002). Lessons learned from the hybrid course project. Teaching with Technology Today, 8(6). DOI: https://hccelearning.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/lessons-learned-from-the-hybrid-course-project.pdf
  4. Bhowmik, J., Meyer, D., & Phillips, B. (2016). Blended Learning in Postgraduate Applied Statistics Programs. Proceedings: OZCOTS 2016,
  5. Canberra, Australia, 83-88. DOI: http://iase-web.org/Publications.php?p=Regional_Publications
  6. Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for Quality Learning at University, SHRE and Open University Press.
  7. Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university: what the student does, 2nd Edition, Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press,
  8. UK. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university, 4th Edition, Open University Press,UK. Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain. Addison-Wesley Longman Ltd. USA. Bloom, B.S. (Ed.). Engelhart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H., Krathwohl, D.R. (1956).
  9. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc. Bloxham, S., & Boyd, P. (2007). Developing effective assessment in higher education: A practical guide. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  10. Brooks, D. C. (2016). ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology. Research report. Louisville, CO: ECAR. https://er.educause.edu/~/media/files/library/2016/10/ers1605.pdf?la=en
  11. Chen, W., & Looi, C. (2007). Incorporating online discussion in face to fact classroom learning: A new blended learning approach. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 23, 307-326.
  12. Dahlstrom, E., & Bichsel, J. (2014). Study of Undergraduate Stud