SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2012 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1

A COMPARISON OF STUDENT SATISFACTION BETWEEN TRADITIONAL AND BLENDED TECHNOLOGY COURSE OFFERINGS IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION

Lecturer Nikolaos VERNADAKIS Ph.D. Candidate Maria GIANNOUSI Lecturer Efi Tsitskari Associate Professor Panagiotis ANTONIOU Professor Efthimis KIOUMOURTZOGLOU Department of Physical Education and Sport Science Democritus University of Thrace, 69100 Komotini, GREECE

Nikolaos VERNADAKIS
Maria GIANNOUSI
Efi Tsitskari
Panagiotis ANTONIOU
Sfthimis KIOUMOURTZOGLOU
Pages
137–147
Publication Date
2012-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results indicated that a blended course delivery is preferred over the traditional lecture format.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Blended learning With the concerns and dissatisfaction with e-learning, educators are searching for alternative instructional delivery solutions to relieve the above problems.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Forty six (n=46) undergraduate students, between the ages of 20-22 years old, were randomly assigned into two teaching method groups: Classroom Lecture Instruction (CLI) and Blended Lecture Instruction (BLI).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results indicated that a blended course delivery is preferred over the traditional lecture format.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Distance Learning · Blended Learning · Traditional Learning

Abstract

Blended learning With the concerns and dissatisfaction with e-learning, educators are searching for alternative instructional delivery solutions to relieve the above problems. The blended e-learning system has been presented as a promising alternative learning approach. While blended learning has been recognized as having a number of advantages, insufficient learning satisfaction is still an obstacle to its successful adoption. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate students’ satisfaction with blended learning course delivery compared to a traditional face-to-face class format in a general multimedia course in physical education. Forty six (n=46) undergraduate students, between the ages of 20-22 years old, were randomly assigned into two teaching method groups: Classroom Lecture Instruction (CLI) and Blended Lecture Instruction (BLI). For the data collection at the end of this study, students completed an online satisfaction questionnaire. Independent sample t-test analysis was conducted to measure students’ satisfaction towards the CLI and BLI methods. Results indicated that a blended course delivery is preferred over the traditional lecture format. These finding suggest that students' satisfaction could increase when the instructor provides learning environments not only in a traditional classroom, but in an asynchronous online system as well.

🔖

Cite This Article

VERNADAKIS, N., GIANNOUSI, M., Tsitskari, E., ANTONIOU, P., KIOUMOURTZOGLOU, S. (2012). A COMPARISON OF STUDENT SATISFACTION BETWEEN TRADITIONAL AND BLENDED TECHNOLOGY COURSE OFFERINGS IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1, 137–147. https://ajindex.com/articles/140269

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Amrein-Beardsley, A., Foulger, T. S., Toth, M. (2007). Examining the development of a hybrid degree program: Using student and instructor data to inform decision making. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39, 331-357.
  2. Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass Inc. Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y.Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., Wallet, P. A., Fiset, M., & Huang, B. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, (3), 379-439.
  3. Centra, J. A. (1993). Reflective faculty evaluation: Enhancing teaching and determining faculty effectiveness. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass Inc. Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2007). E-learning and the science of instruction (2nd ed.). San Francisco, Jossey-Bass Inc. Cooner, T. S. (2010). Creating opportunities for students in large cohorts to reflect in and on practice: lessons learnt from a formative evaluation of students’ experiences of a technology-enhanced blended learning design. British Journal of Educational Technology, (2), 271–286.
  4. Green, B. S., & Salkind, J. N. (2007). Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh (5th ed.). New Jersey, Prentice Hall. Ireland, J., Marindale, S., Johnson, N., Adams, D. Eboh, W., & Mowatt, E. (2009). Blended learning in education: Effects on knowledge and attitude. British Journal of Nursing, (2), 124-130.
  5. Iverson, K. M., Colky, D. L., & Cyboran, V. L. (2005). E-learning takes the lead: an empirical investigation of learner differences in online and classroom delivery. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 18(4), 5-18.
  6. Kleinman, J., & Entin, E. B. (2002). Comparison of in-class and distance-learning students’ performance and attitudes in an introductory computer science course. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 17(6), 206-219.
  7. Larson, D., & Chung-Hsien, S. (2009). Comparing student performance: online versus blended versus face-to-face. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(1), 31-42.
  8. Macedo-Rouet, M., Ney, M., Charles, S., & Lallich-Boidin, G.(2009). Students’ performance and satisfaction with Web vs. paper-based practice quizzes and lecture notes. Computers & Education, 53, 375-384.
  9. Marsh, H. W. (1982). SEEQ: a reliable, valid, and useful instrument for collecting students’ evaluations of university teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology,, 77-95.
  10. McFarland, D., & Hamilton, D. (2005). Facto