SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2014 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1

Students’ Preferences And Opinions On Design Of A Mobile Marketing Education Application

F. Zeynep OZATA
Nilgun OZDAMAR KESKIN
Pages
—
Publication Date
2014-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Added to these themes, eight motives for the use of a mobile marketing education application were also identified.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to define and better understand business school students’ opinions and preferences on the design of a mobile marketing education application.
📊
Key Findings & Data:First, a questionnaire was conducted with 168 business school students from Anadolu University to define their learning styles.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Added to these themes, eight motives for the use of a mobile marketing education application were also identified.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Marketing Education · Learning Styles · Mobile Learning

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to define and better understand business school students’ opinions and preferences on the design of a mobile marketing education application. To accomplish this purpose an explanatory mixed methods study design was used and the data was collected sequentially. First, a questionnaire was conducted with 168 business school students from Anadolu University to define their learning styles. The learning orientation questionnaire produced five factors: visual, auditory, dependent, collaborative, and reading & writing learning styles. In the second phase of the study, semi-structured in depth interviews were conducted with nine graduate students at Anadolu University to better understand their preferences and explore their opinions on the mobile application. After the coding process three themes emerged: learning styles, content, and tools. Added to these themes, eight motives for the use of a mobile marketing education application were also identified.

🔖

Cite This Article

OZATA, F. Z., KESKIN, N. O. (2014). Students’ Preferences And Opinions On Design Of A Mobile Marketing Education Application. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1. https://ajindex.com/articles/140248

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Acar, O. (2013, May 20). ‘Türkiye’de Akıllı Telefon Kullanımı İstatistikleri ve Mobil Bankacılığa Etkisi’, [“Usage of Smart Phones Statistics in Turkey and the Effect of Mobile Banking”]. http://www.okanacar.com/2013/05/turkiyede-akll-telefon-kullanm.html Retrieved 25 September 2013.
  2. Clarke III, I, & Flaherty, T.B. (2002). MLearning: Using wireless technology to enhance marketing education. Marketing Education Review, 12(3), 67-76.
  3. Cochrane, T. (2013). A Summary and critique of m-learning research and practice. In Z.L. Berge & L. Muilenburg (Eds.) Handbook of mobile learning, (pp. 24-34).
  4. Newyork, USA: Routledge. Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E. & Ecclestone, K. (2004). Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning. A systematic and critical review, learning and skills research center (Great Britain) (LSRC). Retrieved 8 October 2013, from http://lerenleren.nu/bronnen/Learning%20styles%20by%20Coffield%20e.a.pdf
  5. Cook, J. (2009). Phases of mobile Learning. Paper presented at joint European summer school on technology enhanced learning (May 30-June 6). Retrieved 7 July 2013, from: www.slideshare.net/johnnigelcook/cook-phases-of-mobile-learning. Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education International. Crompton, H. (2013). An historical overview of mLearning: Toward learner-centered education. In Z. L. Berge & L. Muilenburg (Eds.) Handbook of mobile learning, (pp. 3-14).
  6. Newyork, USA: Routledge. Cury, L. (1983). Learning style in continuing education. Halifax, Canada: Dalhousie University. Frogber, D., Goth, C. & Schwabe, G. (2009). Mobile learning projects – A critical analysis of the state of the art. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(4), 307-331.
  7. Hunt, L., Eagle, L. and Kitchen, P.J. (2004). ‘Balancing marketing education and information technology: Matching needs or needing a better match?’, Journal of Marketing Education, vol.26, no.1, April, pp. 75-88. Grasha-Riechmann Student Learning Style Scales. Retrieved 19 July 2013, from http://academic.cuesta.edu/wholehealth/disted/about_styles.htm
  8. Hunt, L., Eagle, L. & Kitchen, P. J. (2004). Balancing marketing education and information technology: Matching needs or needing a better match?. Journal of Marketing Education, 26(1), 75-88 Information and Communication Technology Authority (ICTA)(2013). Türkiye Elektronik Haberleşme Sektörü 3 Aylık Pazar Verileri Raporu, 2013 Y