Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2013 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3

Support And Social Activities In Internet-Based Distance Education

Pages
261–285
Publication Date
2013-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Further, they stated that the social environments they mostly faced with each other were final exams and graduation ceremony.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, it is aimed to propose practical suggestions through determining the state of support activities and social activities among internet-based educational programs in distance education.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In line with this aim, students’ and instructors’ views related with support activities and social activities practiced in the programs within internet-based distance education models applied in Mersin University Mersin Vocational Schools were gathered. 502 students and 30 instructors participated in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Further, they stated that the social environments they mostly faced with each other were final exams and graduation ceremony.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Distance Education · Internet-Based Learning · Support Activities

Abstract

In this study, it is aimed to propose practical suggestions through determining the state of support activities and social activities among internet-based educational programs in distance education. In line with this aim, students’ and instructors’ views related with support activities and social activities practiced in the programs within internet-based distance education models applied in Mersin University Mersin Vocational Schools were gathered. 502 students and 30 instructors participated in the study. The quantitative data was collected through surveys, and the qualitative data was gathered through interviews. Frequencies and percentages were used to analyze the categorical data. Moreover, the qualitative data was analyzed via content analysis. According to the findings of the study, students needed to get support about education directives, career guidance, technical equipment, and personal problems. The most frequently visited sources to get support by students are teachers, secretariat, and administrative units. However, students did not consider the supports they got from these units as sufficient. According to most of the students and instructors participated in the study, being involved in social activities was so prominent specifically to provide motivation for students. However, it seems impossible to be engaged in social activities in distance education due to the nature of distance education. Students generally regarded themselves as unsocial, and they considered provided social interaction environment as insufficient. Students and instructors expressed that they mostly interacted through social networking sites. Further, they stated that the social environments they mostly faced with each other were final exams and graduation ceremony.

🔖

Cite This Article

TIRNOVALI, A., KILIC, F. (2013). Support And Social Activities In Internet-Based Distance Education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3, 261–285. https://ajindex.com/articles/140218

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Al, U., and Madran, O. (2004). Web-Based Distance Education Systems: Specifications and Standards, The world of information, 5(2): 259-271.
  2. Amiotte, S. and Wheeler, S. (2005). The Death of Distance: Documetting the Effect of Distance Education in South Dakota, Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, ISSN 1302-6488 6 (1). Arslan, M. (2004). Eğitim Sistemimizin Kapanmayan Yarası-Yükseköğretime Geçiş, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi (The Festering Sore Of Our Education System-Transition To Higher Education), Journal Of Social Sciences Institute, No: 16 (37-51) http://sbe.erciyes.edu.tr/dergi/sayi_16/05_aslan.pdf 07.07.2012 (Date accessed). Aşkar, M. (2000).
  3. Teknolojiler, Araçlar, Servisler ve Ortamlar [Technologies, Tools, Services and Media], Tübitak, May Bulletin. Bartoletti, R. (2011). Visual Design for Distance Education Content, http://cnx.org/content/col10556/1.1 retrieved on 16.06.2012.
  4. Burn, M. (2010). Not Too Distant: A Survey of Strategies for Teacher Support In Distance Education Programs, Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, ISSN 1302-6488 11(2). Burns, E. C. ( 2011). The Adult Learner: A Change Agent in Post-Secondary Education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 14(2). Bontempi, E. (2003). Motivation and Distance Learning: What we Knows So Far. http://www.xplanazine.com/2003/11/motivation-and-distance-learning-what-we- know-so-far retrieved on 07.07.2009
  5. Bronack, S., Riedl, R. and Tashner, J. (2006). Learning İn The Zone: A Social Constructivist Framework For Distance Education in a 3-Dimensional Virtual World, Interactive Learning Environments, 14(3), pp. 219–232
  6. Carr, K. C. and Farley, C. L. (2003). Redesigning Courses For The World Wide Web. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 48(6), 407-417.
  7. Chaudry, M. A. and Rahman, F. (2010). A Critical Review of Instructional Design Process of Distance Learning System, Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, ISSN 1302-6488 11(3), Article 11. Clark, R. C. and Mayer, E. R. (2005). E-Learning and Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning. Jossey-Bass Pfeiffer. Cosgrove, M. (2002). Telecommunications Distance Learning and Teacher Preparation. http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED477732.pdf retrieved on 17.06.2009.
  8. Chaney, B. (2005).
  9. History, Theory, and Quality İndicators Of Distance Education: A Literature Review, (pp. 7-10),
  10. Educational Technology Review. Callı, I. (2002). Türkiye’de Uzaktan Eğitimin Geleceği ve E