Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2018 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1

Psychological Variables of Estimating Distance Learners' Motivation

Pages
163–182
Publication Date
2018-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The students who were not satisfied in three different motivation levels mentioned the problems of internet access and lack of synchronization between the picture and the sound in the videos.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The correlation between distance education motivation levels of students and their online experiences and satisfaction is studied in this paper; and the reasons of their satisfaction and dissatisfaction according to their motivation levels are described.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, 183 students, who were taking English and Turkish courses at Ankara University between 2013-2014 academic year through distance education participated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The students who were not satisfied in three different motivation levels mentioned the problems of internet access and lack of synchronization between the picture and the sound in the videos.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2013-2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Distance education motivation · online learning experience · distance education satisfaction

Abstract

The correlation between distance education motivation levels of students and their online experiences and satisfaction is studied in this paper; and the reasons of their satisfaction and dissatisfaction according to their motivation levels are described. In this study, 183 students, who were taking English and Turkish courses at Ankara University between 2013-2014 academic year through distance education participated. The study which was designed in the form of sequential mixed method research design, “Motivation and Learning Strategies Inventory” and “Online Student Satisfaction Scale” were utilized to collect data and structured interview forms that were developed by the researchers and they were also used to determine students’ online learning experiences and their satisfaction levels about distance education. Three motivation levels as low- medium-level- high were identified by clustering analysis. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate motivation levels and satisfaction data and content analysis was applied to evaluate the reasons behind their satisfaction. A significant correlation was found between the students’ motivation levels and their online learning experiences and satisfaction. When it comes to the reasons of their satisfaction and dissatisfaction, the students who have low and medium-level motivation levels said that their dissatisfaction was due to lack of interaction and negative perceptions and their dependence on conventional education. On the other hand, the students who have high motivation stated that their satisfaction was because it is free from time and space, suitable for reviews, provides effective learning and meets the requirements of this age. The students who were not satisfied in three different motivation levels mentioned the problems of internet access and lack of synchronization between the picture and the sound in the videos.

🔖

Cite This Article

CAKIR, O., KARADEMIR, T., ERDOGDU, F. (2018). Psychological Variables of Estimating Distance Learners' Motivation. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1, 163–182. https://ajindex.com/articles/140164

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Althaus, S. L. (1997). Computer-mediated communication in the university classroom: An experiment with on-line discussions. Communication Education, 46(3), 158–174.
  2. Arbaugh, J. B. 2000. How classroom environment and student engagement affect learning in Internet-based MBA courses. Business Communication Quarterly, 63 (4), 9–26.
  3. Artino, A.R. (2008). Motivational beliefs and perceptions of instructional quality: predicting satisfaction with online training. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(3), 260– 270. Balaban-Sali, J. (2008). Designing motivational learning systems in distance education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 9(3), 149-161.
  4. Bambara, C. S., Harbour, C. P., Davies, T. G., & Athey, S. (2009). Delicate engagement: The lived experience of community college students enrolled in high-risk online courses. Community College Review, 36(3), 219-238.
  5. Battalio, J. (2007). Interaction online: A reevaluation. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(4), 339-352.
  6. Belcheir, M., & Cucek, M. (2002). Faculty perceptions of teaching distance education courses. Research Report: 2002.
  7. Boise, ID: Boise State University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 480925). Bourne, J. and Moore, J. C. (2003). Elements of quality online education: into the mainstream. Elements of Quality Online Education: Into the Mainstream. Edited by John Bourne and Janet C. Moore. Volume 5 in the Sloan-C Series. Bouhnik, D. & Marcus, T. (2006). Interaction in distance-learningcourses. Journal of The American Society Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 299–305.
  8. Brinkerhoff, J. & Koroghlanian, C.M. (2005). Student computer skills and attitudes toward internet-delivered instruction: An assessment of stability over time and place. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32, 27–56.
  9. Brophy, J. E. (2010). Motivating students to learn (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge. Bork, R. H. & Z. Rucks-Ahidiana. (2013). Role ambiguity in online courses: An analysis of student and instructor expectations (CCRC Working Paper No. 64). New York: Columbia University, Teachers College, Community College Research Center. Retrieved September 10, 2016 from https://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/media/k2/ attachments/roleambiguity-in-online-courses.pdf Buyukozturk, S., Akgun, O. E., Ozkahveci, O., Demirel, F. (2004). Gudulenme ve ogrenme stratejileri olceginin Turkce formunun gecerlik ve guvenirlik calismasi [The Validity and Reliability Study of the Turkish Version of the Motivated Strategies f