SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2018 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1

Quality Practices: An Open Distance Learning Perspective

Kemlall RAMDASS
Fulufhelo ṊEMAVHOLA
Pages
234–246
Publication Date
2018-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, this paper explores the current quality practices with the intent to improve the delivery of teaching and learning in an ODL environment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Global transformation in higher education over the past two decades has led to the implementation of national policies in order to measure the performance of institutions in South Africa.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Hence the research question is to determine the status of quality with a view of recommending total quality management as a strategy that would enhance the practice of quality in the organization.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, this paper explores the current quality practices with the intent to improve the delivery of teaching and learning in an ODL environment.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Quality practices · open distance learning · total quality management

Abstract

Global transformation in higher education over the past two decades has led to the implementation of national policies in order to measure the performance of institutions in South Africa. The Higher Education Quality Council (HEQC) adopted the quality assurance (QA) model for the purposes of accountability and governance in South African Higher Education. The first Council of Higher Education (CHE) audit, encouraged a compliance mentality through a ‘tick box’ mentality, thereby encouraging compliance of minimum standards. Thus, quality assurance audits became a ‘feared’ phenomenon in all higher education institutions in South Africa. The complete lack of stewardship in addressing the culture of quality and its’ implications for continuous improvement has led to inefficiencies in the entire higher education landscape. In this paper the ‘fuzzy’ and perhaps ‘slippery’ nature of quality is addressed through a critical analysis of the concepts of development, enhancement and assurance in relation to the quality of teaching and learning in higher education through a case study methodology using qualitative analysis in an open distance learning institution (ODL). The key argument is that although quality is important for improvement, practices at the institution are not changing in the way they should because of a quality culture that is determined by the Department of Higher Education and Training. Hence the research question is to determine the status of quality with a view of recommending total quality management as a strategy that would enhance the practice of quality in the organization. Therefore, this paper explores the current quality practices with the intent to improve the delivery of teaching and learning in an ODL environment.

🔖

Cite This Article

RAMDASS, K., ṊEMAVHOLA, F. (2018). Quality Practices: An Open Distance Learning Perspective. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1, 234–246. https://ajindex.com/articles/140155

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Bradley, G. (2001). Towards a pragmatic scholarship of academic development. Quality Assurance in Education, 9(3), 162-170.
  2. Brew, A., & Peseta, T. (2008). The precarious existence of the academic development unit. Boughey (2013) ‘The significance of structure, culture and agency in supporting and developing student learning at South African universities’ in Dhunpath & Vithal (eds.) Alternative access to higher education. 245 Boughey, C., & McKenna, S. (2015). Analysing an audit cycle: a critical realist account. Studies in Higher Education, 1-13.
  3. Boughey, C. (2007). Marrying Equity and Efficiency: The Need for Third Generation Academic Development. Perspectives in Education, 25(3), 27-38.
  4. Belawati, T., & Zuhairi, A. (2007). The practice of a quality assurance system in open and distance learning: A case study at Universitas Terbuka Indonesia (The Indonesia Open University). The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 8(1). Bates, A. W. (2000). Managing technological change: Strategies for college and university leaders. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Brennan, J., & Shah, T. (Eds.). (2000). Managing quality in higher education. Milton Keynes: OECD, SRHE & Open University Press.
  5. Coates, H. (2005). The value of student engagement for higher education quality assurance. Quality in Higher Education, 11(1), 25-36.
  6. Crosby, P. B. (1980). Quality is free: The art of making quality certain. Signet. Daft, R. L. (2006). Organizational Theory and Design, 9th Edition.
  7. Mason, OH.: Thomson Southwestern. Daniel, J. (1999). Open learning and/ or distance education: which one for what purpose? In K. Harry (Ed). Higher education through open and distance learning (p. 292- 298). London: Routledge and Commonwealth of Learning. Doherty, G. (Ed.). (2003). Developing quality systems in education. Routledge. Deming, W. E. (1982). Quality, productivity, and competitive position. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Center for Advanced En. Garrison, D. R. (1993). Quality and access in distance education: Theoretical considerations. In D. Keegan (Ed.) Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 9-21). New York: Routledge. Goetsch, D. L., & Davis, S. B. (2014). Quality management for organizational excellence. pearson. Garvin, D. A. (1984). Product quality: An important strategic weapon. Business horizons, 27(3), 40-43.
  8. Gosling, D., & D'Andrea, V. (2001). Quality development: a new concept for higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 7(1), 7-17. D'A