SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2012 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3

Assessment In Education: A Case For Quality And Standards Within The Context Of Open And Distance Education: A Case Study Of One Zimbabwean University

Wellington SAMKANGE
Pages
275–296
Publication Date
2012-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results indicated that both current and former students were generally satisfied with the assessment methods used in their programmes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A study was carried out to assess the assessment procedures used at one Open and Distance Learning (ODL) institution in Zimbabwe.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study focused on the views and perceptions of current and former students of the university.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results indicated that both current and former students were generally satisfied with the assessment methods used in their programmes.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Quality · Assessment · Standards

Abstract

A study was carried out to assess the assessment procedures used at one Open and Distance Learning (ODL) institution in Zimbabwe. The study focused on the views and perceptions of current and former students of the university. The study also analyzed some documents on assessment procedures at the university. The study used the qualitative methodology and data was qualitatively analyzed. The focus was on fifty current and former students in the Bachelor of Education in Educational Management (BEDM) and Master of Education in Educational Management (MEDM) programmes. Results indicated that both current and former students were generally satisfied with the assessment methods used in their programmes. These included assignments, examinations and research projects/dissertations. It was noted that examinations had the highest weighting in both programmes. However, the study also noted that there were some practices that compromised quality if not carefully handled. These included the supervision of research projects and dissertations by only one supervisor per student. There were fears of bias in that regard. The study came up with a number of recommendations. These included the need to reconcile and align regulations in Tutorial Letters with General Information and Regulations currently in use. Other recommendations included the need to review the study period without compromising the quality of education for BEDM, and the need to deal with issues of plagiarism of assignments. It should also be mandatory for Masters’ students to attend a viva voce to defend their dissertations. Finally, ODL demands innovative assessment methods which should be clearly distinct from conventional modes of assessment.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAMKANGE, W. (2012). Assessment In Education: A Case For Quality And Standards Within The Context Of Open And Distance Education: A Case Study Of One Zimbabwean University. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3, 275–296. https://ajindex.com/articles/140147

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. ARG (2004).
  2. Testing, Motivation and Learning; www.assessment-reform- group.org (Accessed 10 November 2008).
  3. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., and Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for Learning: Putting it into Practice. Berkshire, England: Open University Press.
  4. Black, P. and William, D. (1998) Inside the Black box: Raising standards through Classroom Assessment http://www.pdkint/.org/kappan/kbla, Accessed 28 April Borg, W. R., and Gall, M. R. (1991). Educational Research: An Introduction 4th Ed, London, Longman. Bruner, J. (1996).
  5. The Culture of Education, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  6. Chakanyuka, S. (2000).
  7. Measurement and Evaluation, EA3PD304. Harare, ZOU. Chakanyuka, S.C (1996). Leadership and Organizational Effectiveness; Module EA3AD301, Harare, C.D.E. Chase, C. J. (1978). Measuring for Educational Evaluation. Massachusetts, Addison- Wesley Publishing Company. Chelimsky, E. (1997). The Coming Transformation In Evaluation. In Evaluation for st century: A handbook, eds. Chelimsky, E and Shadish, W. R. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Coombs, P. H., and Hallak, J. (1987). Cost Analysis in Education; A Tool for Policy and Planning. Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  8. Goodwin, A. L (ed) (1997). Assessment for Equity and Inclusion: Embracing All Our Children, London, Routledge. Grisay, A., and Mahlck, L. (1990). The Quality of Education in Developing countries; A Review of some Research Studies and Policy Documents: Paris, UNESCO. Gronlund, N. E (1985). Measurement and Evaluation in Teaching, 5th Ed, New York, Macmillan. Desforges, C. (1989).
  9. Testing and Assessment. London, Cassell Education Limited. Hallak, J. (1996). Educational Challenges of the 21st Century: the vision of quality, UNESCO, IIEP. Harlen, W. (2007).
  10. Assessment of Learning. London, SAGE Publications. Murphy, P. (ed) (1999).
  11. Learners, Learning and Assessment. London, SAGE Publications. Ogunniyi, M. B. (1984). Educational Measurement and Evaluation. Ikefa, Longman. Posavac, E. J. and Carey, R. G. (2007). Program Evaluation, 7th Ed. Upper Saddle River, Prentice Hall. The Sunday Mail, January 1-7, (2012).
  12. Zimpapers, Harare, Zimbabwe. UNESCO. (2005). Education Policies and Strategies? Decentralization in Education; National Policies and Practices, Paris, UNESCO. Race, P., Brown, S., and Smith, B. (2005). 500 Tips on Assessment (2nd Ed). London, Routtledge Falmer. Rassi, J. A. (1999). Rationale for Formative Assessment Component http://www.asha.org/certification/Rassi-For