SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2012 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3

Accreditation Of Open And Distance Learning: A Framework For Turkey

Serpil KOCDAR
Cengiz Hakan AYDIN
Pages
97–120
Publication Date
2012-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, 35 criteria for new programs and 42 criteria for ongoing programs were developed to be used in the accreditation process.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to develop a framework for the accreditation of higher open and distance learning (ODL) programs in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the first strand, both quantitative and qualitative data were collected through a three-round Delphi study with an expert panel consisting of 28 experts.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, 35 criteria for new programs and 42 criteria for ongoing programs were developed to be used in the accreditation process.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Accreditation in Open and Distance learning · Delphi Technique · Focus Group Interview

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop a framework for the accreditation of higher open and distance learning (ODL) programs in Turkey. The study was designed as a sequential monomethod multistrand mixed model including two strands which were both qualitative (QUAL→QUAL). In the first strand, both quantitative and qualitative data were collected through a three-round Delphi study with an expert panel consisting of 28 experts. In the second strand, qualitative data were collected via focus group interview. Based on a comprehensive literature review and the findings from the study, a framework was proposed including an initial accreditation process for new ODL programs and a re-accreditation process for ongoing programs. In addition, 35 criteria for new programs and 42 criteria for ongoing programs were developed to be used in the accreditation process.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOCDAR, S., AYDIN, C. H. (2012). Accreditation Of Open And Distance Learning: A Framework For Turkey. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3, 97–120. https://ajindex.com/articles/140123

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Belawati, T. (2010). Quality assurance. In T.Belawati & J.Baggaley (Eds.), Policy and practice in Asian distance education (pp. 49-60). New Delhi: SAGE. Best Practices For Electronically Offered Degree and Certificate Programs (2001). Retrieved from http://wcet.wiche.edu/wcet/docs/cigs/studentauthentication/ Accrediting_BestPractice s.pdf Chalmers D., & Johnston, S. (2012). Quality assurance and accreditation in higher education. In I. Jung & C. Latchem (Eds.), Quality assurance and accreditation in distance education and e-learning: models, policies and research (pp. 1-12).
  2. Newyork, NY: Routledge. Clayton, M. J. (1997). Delphi: a technique to harness expert opinion for critical decision-making tasks in education. Educational Psychology, 17(4), 373-386.
  3. Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: planning, conducting and evaluating quantitaive and qualitative research. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc. Dalkey, N. C. (2002). Toward a theory of group estimation. In H.A. Linstone & M. Turoff (Eds.), The Delphi method: techniques and applications (pp. 231-256). Retrieved from http://is.njit.edu/pubs/delphibook
  4. Daniel, J. S. (2006). Preface. In B. N. Koul & A. Kanwar (Eds.), Perspectives on distance education: towards a culture of quality (pp. vii-viii). Vancouver: Commonwealth of Learning. Retrieved from http://www.col.org/SiteCollectionDocuments/PS-QA_web.pdf
  5. DEC Handbook. (2009). Assessment and accreditation of open and distance learning (ODL) Institutions. India: Distance Education Council and Indira Gandhi National Open University. Retrieved from www.ignou.ac.in/upload/./Click%20here%20for %20Handbook.doc Delbecq, A. L., Van de Ven, A. H., & Gustafson, D. H. (1975). Group techniques for program planning: a guide to nominal group and Delphi processes. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company. DETC. (2009). Accreditation handbook (6th ed.). Washington, D.C.: DETC Accrediting Commission. Retrieved from http://www.detc.org/downloads/accredhandbook /2009/1-2009handbook.pdf EADTU. (2009). Quality assessment for e-learning: a benchmarking approach. Heerlen: EADTU. Eaton, J. S. (2011). An overview of US accreditation. Washington, D.C.: CHEA. http://www.chea.org/pdf/Overview%20of%20US%20Accreditation%2003.2011.pdf
  6. Eaton, J. S. (2008). Accreditation and recognition in the United States. Washington, D.C.: CHEA. Retrieved from http://www.chea.org/pdf/ Accreditation_and_Recognition _PP_ Sept08.pdf Fish, L. S., & Busby, D. M. (2005). The Delphi method. In D.H.Sp