Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2014 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2

Effectiveness Of Arcs Model Of Motivational Design To Overcome Non Completion Rate Of Students In Distance Education

Pages
194–200
Publication Date
2014-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The study indicate that the systems which are developed on the basis of ARCS Model raise the attention of the students during instruction, develop a relevance to the students’ requirements, create a positive expectation for success and help having a satisfaction by reinforcing success.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Students’ course completion rate in distance education is getting attention of the researchers throughout the globe.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Many factors responsible for high non completion rate of students in distance education are job responsibilities, domestic pressure and complexity of course content.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The study indicate that the systems which are developed on the basis of ARCS Model raise the attention of the students during instruction, develop a relevance to the students’ requirements, create a positive expectation for success and help having a satisfaction by reinforcing success.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:ARCS Model · Motivational Design · Non completion rate

Abstract

Students’ course completion rate in distance education is getting attention of the researchers throughout the globe. Many factors responsible for high non completion rate of students in distance education are job responsibilities, domestic pressure and complexity of course content. Some researchers reported psychological reasons for dropout like, feeling of inadequacy, distress (Rickinson and Rutherford, 1996); lack of confidence (Cullen, 1994) examination anxiety (Fan and Chan, 1997). In literature lack of motivation is considered as the major responsible factor for this problem as students generally feel lonely due to lack of communication & competition in distance education. In this article effectiveness of ARCS Model of Motivational Design to overcome the motivational problem of distance learning students is discussed. The study indicate that the systems which are developed on the basis of ARCS Model raise the attention of the students during instruction, develop a relevance to the students’ requirements, create a positive expectation for success and help having a satisfaction by reinforcing success.

🔖

Cite This Article

MALIK, S. (2014). Effectiveness Of Arcs Model Of Motivational Design To Overcome Non Completion Rate Of Students In Distance Education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2, 194–200. https://ajindex.com/articles/140120

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Aura et al. (2008). ARCS Model of Motivational Design EDTEC 544. www.irma- international Chyung, S. Y. (2001). Conducting learner analysis to adjust online instruction for your faceless learners. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching & Learning (pp.85-90). Retrieved May 11, 2008 from http://www.uwex.edu/disted/conference/Resource_library/proceedings/01_6.pdf
  2. Cullen, M. (1994). Weighing it up: A case study of discontinuing access students. Occasional Papers Series: No. 2. Edinburgh University, Centre for Continuing Education. Dick, W., & Carey, L. (1990). The systematic design of instruction (3rd ed.). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman, and Company. Fan, R. & Chan, M. (1997). A study on the dropout in mathematics foundation courses. Paper presented at the 11th Annual Conference of the Asian Association of Open Universities, Malaysia. Kaye Shelton & George Saltsman. Applying the ADDIE Model to Online Instruction. Dallas Baptist University, USA, Abilene Christian University, USA Keller, J.M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C.M. Riegeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models (pp. 383-434).
  3. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Keller, J. M., & Kopp, T. W. (1987). An application of the ARCS model of motivational design. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional theories in actions: Lessons illustrating selected theories and models (pp. 289-320).
  4. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Krupar, Karen. (2002).
  5. Academy of Teaching Excellence, Metropolitan State College of Denver. Retrieved August 2002, http://clem.mscd.edu/~schwarca/courseconstruct/addie- d.html Olgren C.H.(1998). Improving Learning Outcomes: The effects of learning strategies & motivation. In C.C Gibson Ed. Distance Learners in Higher Education (pp.77-96).
  6. Madison, WI: Atwood Phythian, T. & Clements, M. (1980). Post-foundation tutorial planning. Teaching at a Distance, 18, 38-43.
  7. Rickinson, B. & Rutherford, D. (1996). Systematic monitoring of the adjustment to university of undergraduates: a strategy for reducing withdrawal rates. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 24(2), 213-232.
  8. Sali B. Jale (2008). Designing Motivational Learning Systems in Distance Education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE. Volume: 9 Number: 3 Article 13 Sally M. Johnstone (2005). Advancing the Effective Use of Technology in Higher Education. Encyclopedia of Distance Learning (pp. 79-82).
  9. Visser, L., Plomp, T., Arimault, R., & Kuiper, W. (2002). Motivating students