Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2014 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2

A Comparison Of Student Views On Web-Based And Face-To-Face Higher Education

Suleyman Nihat SAD (Corresponding Author) Curriculum and Instruction

Pages
209–226
Publication Date
2014-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that web-based students were most positive about lifelong learning opportunities provided in their distance programs, followed by learning-teaching procedures, abilities to access and share resources, and lastly chances of cooperation and socialization.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The study aimed to describe and compare the perceptions of web-based distance education students and campus-based face-to-face students about the quality of education provided in their programs with regard to variables including gender, marital-status, and employment status.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 536 students studying at two higher education institutions participated in the study. “Student Program Assessment Scale [SPAS]” was developed and used to assess web-based and face-to-face students’ perceptions about the quality of education in their programs.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that web-based students were most positive about lifelong learning opportunities provided in their distance programs, followed by learning-teaching procedures, abilities to access and share resources, and lastly chances of cooperation and socialization.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Distance Education · Web-Based Education · Face-To-Face Education

Abstract

The study aimed to describe and compare the perceptions of web-based distance education students and campus-based face-to-face students about the quality of education provided in their programs with regard to variables including gender, marital-status, and employment status. A baseline descriptive survey design and complementary ex post facto design were used in this study. A total of 536 students studying at two higher education institutions participated in the study. “Student Program Assessment Scale [SPAS]” was developed and used to assess web-based and face-to-face students’ perceptions about the quality of education in their programs. The results showed that web-based students were most positive about lifelong learning opportunities provided in their distance programs, followed by learning-teaching procedures, abilities to access and share resources, and lastly chances of cooperation and socialization. Face-to-face students were almost neutral in all aspects and, compared to web-based students, they were significantly less positive about lifelong learning opportunities (large effect size), learning-teaching procedures (medium effect size), and abilities to access and share resources (small effect size) provided by their programs. Face-to-face and web-based learners were similarly and moderately positive about the cooperation and socialization opportunities provided in their programs. Gender, marital status and employment were found to cause no differences in practical sense on perceptions of web-based and face-to-face students.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAD, S. N., GOKTAS, O., BAYRAK, İ. (2014). A Comparison Of Student Views On Web-Based And Face-To-Face Higher Education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2, 209–226. https://ajindex.com/articles/140112

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Akca, O. (2006). SAÜ uzaktan eğitim öğrencilerinin iletişim engellerli ile ilgili öğrenci görüşleri [Demands of the SAU distance education students according to communication barriers.].Unpublished master thesis. Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey. Akdemir, O. (2008). Teaching in online courses: Experiences of instructional technology faculty members. Turkish OnlineJournal of Distance Education, 9(2) 97-108,
  2. Eskisehir, Turkey. Al, U. & Mardan, R. O. (2004). Web tabanlı uzaktan eğitim sistemleri: sahip olması gereken özellikler ve standartlar [Web-based distance education systems: required features and standards]. Bilgi Dünyası, 5(2), 259-271,
  3. Turkey. Alkan, C. (1998). Eğitim teknolojisi ve uzaktan eğitimin kavramsal boyutları [The conceptual dimentions of educational technologies and distance education]. Ankara:
  4. Unal Ofset Matbaaları, Turkey. Annagylyjov, Y. (2006). Assessing the expository differences between traditional education and virtual class based education. Unpublished master thesis. Gazi University, Ankara,
  5. Turkey. Arıkan, Y. D. (2006). Web destekli etkin öğrenme uygulamalarının öğretmen adaylarının derse yönelik tutumları üzerindeki etkileri [The effects of web-supported active learning activities on teacher trainees’ attitudes towards course]. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 7(1), 23–41,
  6. İzmir,
  7. Turkey. Atan, H., Sulaiman, F., & Idrus, R.M. (2005). The effectiveness of problem-based learning in the web-based environment for the delivery of an undergraduate physics course. International Education Journal, 6(3), 430-437.
  8. Balcı, M. (2008). Karma öğrenme ile ilgili öğrenci görüşleri [Students' opinions on blended learning]. Unpublished master thesis. Hacettepe University, Ankara,
  9. Turkey. Brown, J. L. M. (2012). Online learning: a comparison of web-based and land-based courses. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 13(1), 39-42.
  10. Burma, Z. A. (2008). AB’ye geçiş sürecinde meslek elemanlarinin uzaktan öğretim ile eğitimi [Training of Professional Employees via the distance learning method within the EU entrance process]. Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, 1(2), 15-20,
  11. Turkey. Cukusic, M., Alfirevic, N., Granic, A., & Garaca, Z. (2010). E-learning process management and the e-learning performance: Results of a European empirical study. Computers & Education55, 554-565.
  12. Çokluk, O., Sekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, S. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: Spss ve Lisrel uygulamaları [Multivariate statistics for social sciences: Spss and Lisrel applica