SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2014 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2

Meeting The Needs Of Distance Learners Of M Ed Program: Bangladesh Open University Perspective

Amirul ISLAM
Sakiba FERDOWSI
Pages
175–193
Publication Date
2014-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Arguably, these are issues intrinsic to the successful provision of distance learning courses, and the results both concord with aspects of the research literature (Burge & Howard, 1990; Chen, 1997; Hyland, 2001; Morgan, 1995; Robinson, 1995; Simpson, 2000; Tait, 2000) and raise some interesting questions regarding the provision of distance education and its ability to meet the needs of learners.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study draws on the experience of a cohort of 22 students from 09 tutorial centers enrolled in a Master of Education (M Ed) distance learning program administered by the Bangladesh Open University (BOU).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study found that students were, on the whole, satisfied with the course materials, the choice of modules, assignment feedback, and length of time given to complete the assignments, but significant problems surfaced regarding issues of student support, and access to and provision of resource materials.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Arguably, these are issues intrinsic to the successful provision of distance learning courses, and the results both concord with aspects of the research literature (Burge & Howard, 1990; Chen, 1997; Hyland, 2001; Morgan, 1995; Robinson, 1995; Simpson, 2000; Tait, 2000) and raise some interesting questions regarding the provision of distance education and its ability to meet the needs of learners.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Distance Education · Distance Learners · Needs of Distance Learners

Abstract

This study draws on the experience of a cohort of 22 students from 09 tutorial centers enrolled in a Master of Education (M Ed) distance learning program administered by the Bangladesh Open University (BOU). It's purpose is to locate the aims and philosophies of distance learning within the experiences of actual distance learners in order to see if learners' needs were being met by the program and to obtain a fuller understanding of core aspects of distance education. The study found that students were, on the whole, satisfied with the course materials, the choice of modules, assignment feedback, and length of time given to complete the assignments, but significant problems surfaced regarding issues of student support, and access to and provision of resource materials. Arguably, these are issues intrinsic to the successful provision of distance learning courses, and the results both concord with aspects of the research literature (Burge & Howard, 1990; Chen, 1997; Hyland, 2001; Morgan, 1995; Robinson, 1995; Simpson, 2000; Tait, 2000) and raise some interesting questions regarding the provision of distance education and its ability to meet the needs of learners.

🔖

Cite This Article

ISLAM, A., FERDOWSI, S. (2014). Meeting The Needs Of Distance Learners Of M Ed Program: Bangladesh Open University Perspective. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2, 175–193. https://ajindex.com/articles/140111

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Appleton, M. (1994). Investigating library services for post-graduate off-campus students. In T. Evans & D. Murphy (Eds.), Research in distance education 3 (pp. 78-90).
  2. Geelong, Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press.
  3. Beare, P. L. (1989). The comparative effectiveness of videotape, audiotape, and telelecture in delivering continuing teacher education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 57-66.
  4. Bell, J. (1999). Doing your research project: A guide for first-time researchers in education and social science. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
  5. Burge, E. J., & Howard, J. L. (1990). Audio-conferencing in graduate education: A case study. The American Journal of Distance Education, 4(2), 3-13.
  6. Cavanagh, A. (1994). The role of libraries in off-campus study. In T. Evans & D. Murphy (Eds.), Research in distance education 3 (pp. 91-102).
  7. Geelong, Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press.
  8. Charp, S. (1997). Strategies for bridging distances. THE Journal (Technological Horizons in Education), 24(9), 6-8.
  9. Chen, L. (1997). Distance delivery systems in terms of pedagogical considerations: A revolution. Educational Technology, 37(4), 34-37.
  10. Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1994). Research methods in education (4th ed.). London: Routledge. Delbeq, A., & Scates, D. (1989, August). Distance education through telecommunications: A review of lessons learned. A special report of the American Assembly of Collegiate Schools of Business. Dillon, C., Gunawardena, C., & Parker, R. (1992). An evaluation of learner support services in a distance education system. Distance Education, 13(1), 29-45.
  11. Egan, M. W., Sebastian, J., & Welch, M. (1991, March). Effective television teaching: Perceptions of those who count mostƒdistance learners. Proceedings of the Rural Education Symposium. Nashville, TN. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED373708) Foks, J. (1987). Towards open learning. In P. Smith & M. Kelly (Eds.), Distance education and the mainstream (pp. 74-92). London: Croom Helm. Garrison, G. R. (1990). Understanding distance education: A framework for the future. London: Routledge. Hilgenberg, C., & Tolone, W. (2000). Student perceptions of satisfaction and opportunities for critical thinking in distance education by interactive video, The American Journal of Distance Education, 14(3), 59-73.
  12. Holmberg, B. (1986). Growth and structure of distance education. Kent, England: Croom Helm. Holmberg, B. (1989). Theory and practice of distance education. New York: Ro