Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2014 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3

Student Satisfaction Process In Virtual Learning System: Considerations Based In Information And Service Quality From Brazil’s Experience

Fábio Nazareno MACHADO-DA-SILVA

Pages
122–142
Publication Date
2014-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Future researches should study this subject longitudinally.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Distance learning has undergone great changes, especially since the advent of the Internet and communication and information technology.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This survey assesses the associations among the system quality, information quality, and service quality on student satisfaction and use of systems in virtual learning environments using the e-learning success model adapted by Holsapple and Lee-Post from the Delone and McLean (1992, 2003) model as a theoretical basis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Future researches should study this subject longitudinally.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Distance Education · Student Satisfaction · Quality in e-Learning

Abstract

Distance learning has undergone great changes, especially since the advent of the Internet and communication and information technology. Questions have been asked following the growth of this mode of instructional activity. Researchers have investigated methods to assess the benefits of e-learning from a number of perspectives. This survey assesses the associations among the system quality, information quality, and service quality on student satisfaction and use of systems in virtual learning environments using the e-learning success model adapted by Holsapple and Lee-Post from the Delone and McLean (1992, 2003) model as a theoretical basis. The survey was carried out by means of an online program offered to 291 students from public and private institutions from several regions of Brazil. Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling were used for data analysis in order to understand the student satisfaction process in virtual learning system. Findings show that variations in system quality, information quality, and service quality influence the use of the system, and the User Satisfaction construct had 89% of variance explained by Information Quality and Service Quality. Many of the benefits of distance learning programs are related to students’ satisfaction and the intensity with which they make use of the learning system. With awareness of the indicators that are antecedents of these variables, education executives can plan investments that meet the most significant demands and use the information to deal with one of the major problems in distance learning: the dropout rate. Future researches should study this subject longitudinally.

🔖

Cite This Article

MACHADO-DA-SILVA, F. N., MEIRELLES, F. D. S., FILENGA, D., FILHO, M. B. (2014). Student Satisfaction Process In Virtual Learning System: Considerations Based In Information And Service Quality From Brazil’s Experience. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3, 122–142. https://ajindex.com/articles/140089

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Byrne, R. (2002). Web-based learning versus traditional management development methods. Singapore Management Review, v. 24, n. 2, p. 59-68.
  2. Davis, F. D. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perception and behavioral impact. International Journal of Man-Machine-Studies, v. 38, n. 3, p. 475–487.
  3. Delone, W. H. and McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, v. 3, n. 1, p. 60–86.
  4. Delone, W. H. and McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, v. 19, n. 4, p. 9–30.
  5. Demo, P. (1995). Metodologia Científica em Ciências Sociais. São Paulo: Atlas. Dennis, A. R., Wixom, B. H., and Roth, R. M. (2006). Systems analysis and design. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. Farias, S. A and Santos, R. C. (2000). Modelagem de Equações Estruturais. RAC, v. 4, n. 3, p. 107-132.
  6. Fink, A. (1995a). How to design surveys. The Survey ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage. FINK, A. (1995b). The survey handbook. The Survey ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, v. 18, p. 39– Hair, J. F. et al. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. 5. ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Hancock, G. R. and Mueller, R. O. (2006). Structural equation modeling: A second course. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing. Holsapple, C. W. and Lee-Post, A. (2006). Defining, assessing, and promoting e-learning success: An information systems perspective. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, v. 4, No, p. 18. Jewett, F. (1998). Case studies in evaluating the benefits and costs of mediated and distributed leaning. In: Proceedings Of The 3rd Annual Conference of The Telelearning Network Of Centers of Excellence. Annals. Vancouver, Canada. Jing, I. et al. (2002). Effects of different types of interaction on learning achievement, satisfaction and participation in web-based instruction. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, v. 39(2), p. 153–162.
  7. Kavanagh, M. J. and Thite, M. (2009). Human resource information systems: basics, applications, and future directions. Los Angeles: Sage. Kelly, P. (2011). Web 2.0-based e-learning: Applying social informatics for tertiary teaching. Open Learning, v. 26, n. 3, p. 280-283.
  8. Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of stru