SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2019 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1

Flipping Perceptions, Engagements and Realities: A Case Study

Nihan KUTAHNECIOGLU INAN
Kavitha BALAKRISHNAN
Muhammed REFEQUE
Pages
208–222
Publication Date
2019-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results show both the students and teachers hold a positive perception towards flipped approach, and they consider this approach as an innovative way of teaching and learning.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Flipped learning is considered as an active and constructivist teaching and learning approach to enhance the learning experience of both students and teachers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Separate questionnaires were used to collect the information from teachers and students, and a structured interview was conducted with teachers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results show both the students and teachers hold a positive perception towards flipped approach, and they consider this approach as an innovative way of teaching and learning.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Flipped learning · student engagement · personalized instruction

Abstract

Flipped learning is considered as an active and constructivist teaching and learning approach to enhance the learning experience of both students and teachers. This research, conducted within the framework proposed by Jonathan Bergmann, explores the students’ as well as teachers’ perception of flipped learning. The study uses both quantitative and qualitative methods to collect data from the respondents. Separate questionnaires were used to collect the information from teachers and students, and a structured interview was conducted with teachers. Total of 56 students and 14 teachers from an undergraduate business program participated in this study, and all the respondents had experience in flipped learning. Results show both the students and teachers hold a positive perception towards flipped approach, and they consider this approach as an innovative way of teaching and learning. Study also identified the factors affecting the effectiveness of flipped classrooms and provides necessary recommendations for its successful implementation.

🔖

Cite This Article

INAN, N. K., BALAKRISHNAN, K., REFEQUE, M. (2019). Flipping Perceptions, Engagements and Realities: A Case Study. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1, 208–222. https://ajindex.com/articles/140053

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Al Rowais, A. (2016). 11 Flipped classrooms as a form of blended learning. Transforming Education in the Gulf Region: Emerging Learning Technologies and Innovative Pedagogy for the 21st Century, 171, 150. Arfstrom, K. M., & Network, P. D. F. L. (2013). A white paper based on the literature review titled A Review of flipped learning. Noora Hamdan and Patrick McKnight, Flipped Learning Network. Baepler, P., Walker, J. D., & Driessen, M. (2014). It's not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education, 78, 227-236.
  2. Barnett, R., & Coate, K. (2005). Engaging the Curriculum in Higher Education, Society for Research in Higher Education and Open University Press.
  3. McGraw-Hill House, England. ISBN 0, 335(21289), 1. Barnett, R., & Coate, K. (2004). Engaging the curriculum. McGraw-Hill Education (UK). Bart, M. (2014). Blended and flipped: Exploring new models for effective teaching and learning. Faculty focus (Special Report). Madison, Wisconsin: Magna Publications. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2014). Flipped learning: Gateway to student engagement. International Society for Technology in Education. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International Society for Technology in Education. Bergmann, J., Overmyer, J., & Wilie, B. (2011). The flipped class: Myths vs. reality. The Daily Riff, 1(4). Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational researcher, 13(6), 4-16.
  4. Borg, M. O., & Shapiro, S. L. (1996). Personality type and student performance in principles of economics. The Journal of Economic Education, 27(1), 3-25.
  5. Brame, C. J. (2013). Flipping the classroom. Vanderbilt University. Center for teaching. Retrieved from https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/flipping-the-classroom.
  6. Bryant, S. M., & Hunton, J. E. (2000). The use of technology in the delivery of instruction: Implications for accounting educators and education researchers. Issues in Accounting Education, 15(1), 129-162.
  7. Butt, A. (2014). Student views on the use of a flipped classroom approach: Evidence from Australia. Business Education & Accreditation, 6(1), 33. Chen, Y., Wang, Y., & Chen, N. S. (2014). Is FLIP enough? Or should we use the FLIPPED model instead?. Computers & Education, 79, 16-27.
  8. Cheng, D., & Walters, M. (2009). Peer-Assisted Learning in Mathematics: An Observational Study of Student