Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2014 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2

Personal Outcome And Leadership As Defining Factors Of Satisfaction In The Context Of The Course “Arts Ii: Overview Of Greek Music And Dance” Of The Hellenic Open University

Evangelos BEBETSOS, Dimitrios GOULIMARIS Department of Physical Education

Pages
12–24
Publication Date
2014-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Additionally, results indicated differences between the age groups on the factor of “personal outcome” were the youngest age group had the lowest scores among all three and also, results indicated differences on the factor of “leadership”, were men had higher scores than women.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was twofold: Ø to assess the construct validity of the modified Greek version of the “Scale of Athlete Satisfaction” presented by Theodorakis and Bebetsos (2003) in the broader academic research sector and specifically in the field of Open and Distance Learning, and Ø to examine if variables such as sex, age, marital status and prior experience, influence the levels of students’ satisfaction.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Participants were 144 students (55 men and 89 women) of the Hellenic Open University who participated in the course “Arts II: Review of the Greek Music and Dance”, between the ages of 25 up to 67 years of age (Μage=42, SD=7.62).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Additionally, results indicated differences between the age groups on the factor of “personal outcome” were the youngest age group had the lowest scores among all three and also, results indicated differences on the factor of “leadership”, were men had higher scores than women.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Personal Outcome · Leadership · Age Groups

Abstract

The purpose of this study was twofold: Ø to assess the construct validity of the modified Greek version of the “Scale of Athlete Satisfaction” presented by Theodorakis and Bebetsos (2003) in the broader academic research sector and specifically in the field of Open and Distance Learning, and Ø to examine if variables such as sex, age, marital status and prior experience, influence the levels of students’ satisfaction. Participants were 144 students (55 men and 89 women) of the Hellenic Open University who participated in the course “Arts II: Review of the Greek Music and Dance”, between the ages of 25 up to 67 years of age (Μage=42, SD=7.62). The scale consists of two factors: a) personal outcome and b) leadership. Results from factor analysis provided evidence for the construct validity of the scale developed by Theodorakis and Bebetsos (2003). Additionally, results indicated differences between the age groups on the factor of “personal outcome” were the youngest age group had the lowest scores among all three and also, results indicated differences on the factor of “leadership”, were men had higher scores than women. Overall, the study underlines the necessity of adaptation and usage of such an instrument in order to inform and educate educators, teachers and students about the factors that influence the learning process in combination with personal satisfaction and leadership behavior.

🔖

Cite This Article

BEBETSOS, E., GOULIMARIS, D. (2014). Personal Outcome And Leadership As Defining Factors Of Satisfaction In The Context Of The Course “Arts Ii: Overview Of Greek Music And Dance” Of The Hellenic Open University. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2, 12–24. https://ajindex.com/articles/140041

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Aldemir, C., & Gulcan, Y. (2004). Students Satisfaction in Higher Education: A Turkish Case. Higher Education Management and Policy, 16 (2), 109-122.
  2. Aleamoni, L. M. (1987). Student rating myths versus research facts. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1, 111-119.
  3. Aleamoni, L. M., & Hexner, P. Z. (1980). A review of the research on student evaluation and a report on the effect of different sets of instructions on student course and instructor evaluation. InstructionalScience, 9, 67-84.
  4. Alexandris, K., Papadopoulos, P., Palialia, E., & Vasiliadis, T. (1999). Customer satisfaction: a comparison between public and private sport and fitness clubs in Greece. European Journal forSport Management, 6, 40-54.
  5. Anastasiadis, P., & Karvounis, L. (2010). Students’ opinions in the postgraduate module EKP 65 "Open and Distance Education" for the role and the mission of the Tutor Counsellor in Hellenic Open University.(in Greek) Open Education - The Journal for Open and Distance Education and Educational Technology, 6 (1 & 2), 79-91. Askon, Ε., Johnston, J., Petty, L. & Young, S. (2003). Expanding access to adult literacy with online distance education. Cambridge: NCSALL. Bakogianni S., Kavakli, E., Karkou, V., & Tsakogianni, M. (2007). Teaching traditional dance using e-learning tools: Experience from the WebDANCE project. Proceedings of the 21st World Congress on Dance Research, (pp. 1-16). 5-9 September. Athens: CID- UNESCO Bebetsos, E., & Theodorakis, N. (2003). Athletes’ Satisfaction Among Team Handball Players In Greece. Perceptual and Motor Skills,97, 1203-1208.
  6. Bebetsos, E., Theodorakis, N., & Tsigilis, N. (2007). Relations between Role Ambiguity and Athletes’ Satisfaction among Team Handball Players. The Sport Journal, 10 (4). Centra, J. A. (1993). Reflective faculty evaluation. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass. -Chelladurai, P., & Riemer, H. A. (1997). A classification of facets of athlete satisfaction. Journal ofSport Management, 11, 133-159.
  7. Feldman, K. A. (1993). College students' views of male and female college teachers: Part II—Evidence from students' evaluations of their classroom teachers. Research in Higher Education, 34, 151-211.
  8. Goulimaris, D., Koutsouba, M., & Giosos, Y. (2008). Organisation of a distance postgraduate dance programme and the participation of students specialising in dance. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 9 (3), 59-73.
  9. Goulimaris, D. (2008). The factors that influence the "behavior" of students physical education sp