Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2020 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1

Re-Designing the Design Brief as a Digital Learning Tool with Participatory Design Approach

Pages
83–100
Publication Date
2020-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

All suggestions were found to indicate a more interactive structure depending on the variable and cyclical structure of the design.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Today, industrial design education is faced with a new group of students who have met daily life technologies from a very early age.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this qualitative study conducted with participatory design method, gamification elements were used to increase students’ motivation, interest, and participation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:All suggestions were found to indicate a more interactive structure depending on the variable and cyclical structure of the design.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Design education · new millennium learners · participatory design

Abstract

Today, industrial design education is faced with a new group of students who have met daily life technologies from a very early age. The transformations in educational environments are becoming more and more important for project-based and student-centered design education model. Understanding the needs and expectations of the changing student profile has become essential for design education, which puts new and original outputs as the main objective. Students’ expectations of having a say in their own learning environments also provide an important opportunity for them to play an active role in the focus of this change. The aim of this study is to determine the design criteria of a new learning tool in line with the needs and expectations of the new generation industrial design students with a student-oriented approach. Participatory Design workshops were organized to expose expectations of the current learners about a new Design Brief in a digital and online medium. In this qualitative study conducted with participatory design method, gamification elements were used to increase students’ motivation, interest, and participation. Design criteria for a new generation design brief have been introduced with participatory design method. All suggestions were found to indicate a more interactive structure depending on the variable and cyclical structure of the design.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMIRBAS, D., OGUT, S. T. (2020). Re-Designing the Design Brief as a Digital Learning Tool with Participatory Design Approach. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1, 83–100. https://ajindex.com/articles/139995

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Afacan, Y. (2018). Student Experiences of Blended Learning in Interior Architecture. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 17, 399–422. https://doi.org/10.28945/4122
  2. Ahn, H. (2007). Design Tools and Three Steps in Participatory Design Processes: A Proposal for Better Communications among Residents and Experts, based on a Case, Proceedings of the 6th Conference of the Pacific Rim Community Design Network. Retrieved from http://courses.washington.edu/ quanzhou/pacrim/papers/Ahn-Park-paper.pdf Akademik Dersler - Tanitim. (n.d.). Retrieved December 22, 2016, from http://abp.anadolu.edu.tr/tr/ders/ tanitim/95647/47 Bedir Eristi, S. (Ed.). (2017). Gorsel Arastirma Yontemleri Teori,Uygulama ve Ornek [Visual Research Methods Theory, Applications and Examples] (2nd ed.). Ankara:
  3. Pegem Akademi. Bergold, J., & Thomas, S. (2012). Participatory Research Methods: A Methodological Approach in Motion. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 13(1). Buur, J., Binder, T., & Brandt, E. (2000). Taking Video Beyond “Hard Data” in User Centered Design. Proceedings of the 6th Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design 2000, (December), 21–29. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.89.3499
  4. Cook-Sather, A. (2014). Multiplying perspectives and improving practice: What can happen when undergraduate students collaborate with college faculty to explore teaching and learning. Instructional Science, 42(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9292-3
  5. Cokluk, O., Yilmaz, K., & Oguz, E. (2011). Nitel Bir Gorusme Yontemi: Odak Grup Gorusmesi [ A Qualitative Interview Method: Focus Group Interview],Kuramsal Egitimbilim, 4(1), 95–107.
  6. Demirbas, D., & Timur Ogut, S. (2018). Design Briefs for Industrial Design Studio Courses: Determination of Expectations and Requirements. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 6(2), 42–58.
  7. DiSalvo, B., Yip, J., Bonsignore, E., & DiSalvo, C. (Eds.). (2017). Participatory Design for Learning: Perspectives from Practice and Research. Routledge. Retrieved from https://play.google.com/books/ reader?id=DzYlDwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&output=reader&hl=tr&pg=GBS.PT3 Hamari, J. (2013). Transforming homo economicus into homo ludens: A field experiment on gamification in a utilitarian peer-to-peer trading service. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 12(4), 236–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2013.01.004
  8. Hussain, S., Sanders, E. B. N., & Steinert, M. (2012). P