Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2015 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 4

THEORETICAL GUIDELINES FOR THE UTILIZATION OF INSTRUCTIONAL SOCIAL NETWORKING WEBSITES

Pages
67–83
Publication Date
2015-10-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This paper contributes to this emerging movement by explaining the role of these theories for researchers and practitioners to find ways to beneficially integrate them into their future research endeavors.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the past 10 years, the internet has been transformed, along with the emergence of interaction and communication technologies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:More specifically, the growth of Web 2.0 technologies has acted as a catalyst for change in the disciplines of education.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This paper contributes to this emerging movement by explaining the role of these theories for researchers and practitioners to find ways to beneficially integrate them into their future research endeavors.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Social Networking Sites · Web 2.0 · Uses and Gratification Theory

Abstract

In the past 10 years, the internet has been transformed, along with the emergence of interaction and communication technologies. Indeed, there has been an emerging movement in the interaction and communication technologies. More specifically, the growth of Web 2.0 technologies has acted as a catalyst for change in the disciplines of education. The social networking websites have gained popularity in recent years; therefore, many research studies have been conducted to explain how the use of social networking websites for instructional purposes. For the best practices, it is essential to understand theories associated with social networking studies because related theories for any subject may provide insights and guideline for professionals and researchers. This theoretical paper was designed to offer a road map through the literature in relation to the utilization of social networking websites by presenting main understandings of theories associated with social networking. The Uses and Gratification Theory, social network theory, connectives, and constructivism were selected to serve as a basis for designing social networking studies regarding instructional purposes. Moreover, common attributes of the theories and specific application areas were also discussed. This paper contributes to this emerging movement by explaining the role of these theories for researchers and practitioners to find ways to beneficially integrate them into their future research endeavors.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAKIN, İ., TINMAZ, H. (2015). THEORETICAL GUIDELINES FOR THE UTILIZATION OF INSTRUCTIONAL SOCIAL NETWORKING WEBSITES. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 4, 67–83. https://ajindex.com/articles/139975

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Acquisti, A. & Gross, R. (2006). Imagined communities: Awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. PET 2006 - 6th Workshop on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, Robinson College, Cambridge, United Kingdom. Retrieved May 19, 2010, from http://petworkshop.org/2006/preproc/ preproc_03.pdf Al-Shehri, A. (2011). Connectivism: A new pathway for theorising and promoting mobile language learning. International Journal of Innovation and Leadership in the Teaching of Humanities, 1(2): 10-31.
  2. Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2011). Three Generations of Distance Education Pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 80-97.
  3. Andon, S. P. (2007). Evaluating computer-mediated communication on the university campus: The impact of Facebook.com on the development of romantic relationships. Unpublished master's thesis, The Florida State University, Florida. Arends, R. I. (2001). Learning to teach (5th Ed.). New York: McGraw Hill. Barab, S. A., & Duffy, T. (2000). From practice fields to communities of practice. In D. Jonassen & S. M. Land (Eds.) Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 25-56.
  4. Beer, D. (2008). Social network(ing) sites… revisiting the story so far: A response to danah boyd & Nicole Ellison. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 516-529.
  5. Bell, F. (2011). Connectivism: Its place in theory-informed research and innovation in technology-enabled learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 98-118.
  6. Boitshwarelo, B. (2011). Proposing an integrated research framework for connectivism: Utilizing theoretical synergies. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 161-179.
  7. Boogart, M. R. V. (2006). Uncovering the social impacts of Facebook on a college campus. Unpublished master's thesis, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas. Borgatti, S., Mehra, A., Brass, D. J., & Labianca, G. (2009). Network analysis in the social sciences. Science, 323, 892-895.
  8. Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), Retrieved May 11, 2008 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html
  9. Coyle, C. L. & Vaughn, H. (2008). Social networking: Communication revolution or evolution?. Bell Labs Technical Journal, 13(2), 13-18.
  10. Dalsgaard, C. (2008, June 24). Social networking sites: Transparency in online education. A paper present