Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2015 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

STUDENTS’ EVALUATION OF GOOGLE HANGOUTS THROUGH A CROSS-CULTURAL GROUP DISCUSSION ACTIVITY

Pages
28–39
Publication Date
2015-04-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Qualitative data were also collected through the survey toexamine their overall learning experience.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The study investigated perceived ease of use and usefulness of Google Hangouts as aninstructional/learning tool.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Forty-two teacher education students at U.S and Japaneseuniversities participated in an online cross-cultural activity using Google Hangouts anddiscussed cultural differences between the two countries and their teaching philosophies.After the activity, students responded to a survey to evaluate the ease of use andusefulness of Google Hangouts.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Qualitative data were also collected through the survey toexamine their overall learning experience.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Videoconference · computer mediated communication · online learning

Abstract

The study investigated perceived ease of use and usefulness of Google Hangouts as aninstructional/learning tool. Forty-two teacher education students at U.S and Japaneseuniversities participated in an online cross-cultural activity using Google Hangouts anddiscussed cultural differences between the two countries and their teaching philosophies.After the activity, students responded to a survey to evaluate the ease of use andusefulness of Google Hangouts. Qualitative data were also collected through the survey toexamine their overall learning experience. The results indicated that Google Hangouts is auseful instructional tool, but not easy to use. Although technical problems occurredduring the conference, the activity provided valuable experiences for both U.S. andJapanese students. The study provides suggestions for how Google Hangouts can beintegrated into online classrooms based on the findings.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOBAYASHI, M. (2015). STUDENTS’ EVALUATION OF GOOGLE HANGOUTS THROUGH A CROSS-CULTURAL GROUP DISCUSSION ACTIVITY. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 28–39. https://ajindex.com/articles/139951

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Acquah, E. O., & Commins, N. L. (2013). Pre-service teachers’ beliefs and knowledge about multiculturalism. European Journal Of Teacher Education, 36(4), 445-463. doi:1080/02619768.2013.787593 BAŞBAY, A. (2014). Investigation of Multicultural Education Courses: The Case of Georgia State University. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(2), 602-608. doi:12738/estp.2014.2.2055
  2. Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–339.
  3. Duffy, J. (2013). Does Google+ Have a Future? PC Magazine, 42-44.
  4. Dunn, A., Dotson, E. K., Ford, J. C., & Roberts, M. (2014). “You Won't Believe What They Said in Class Today”: Professors’ Reflections on Student Resistance in Multicultural Education Courses. Multicultural Perspectives, 16(2), 93-98. doi:1080/15210960.2014.899779 Ferguson, R. R. (2010). Peer interaction: the experience of distance students at university level. Journal Of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(6), 574-584. doi:10.1111/j.1365- 272010.00386.x Isaacson, K. (2013, June). An Investigation into the Affordances of Google Hangouts for possible use in Synchronous Online Learning Environments. In World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (Vol. 2013, No. 1, pp. 2461-2465).
  5. Keengwe, J. (2010). Fostering Cross Cultural Competence in Preservice Teachers Through Multicultural Education Experiences. Early Childhood Education Journal, 38(3), 197-204. doi:1007/s10643-010-0401-5
  6. Lee, Y., Hsieh, Y., & Hsu, C. (2011). Adding Innovation Diffusion Theory to the Technology Roseth, C., Akcaoglu, M., & Zellner, A. (2013). Blending Synchronous Face-to-face and Computer-Supported Cooperative Learning in a Hybrid Doctoral Seminar. TechTrends, 57(3), 54-59.
  7. Smyth, R. (2011). Enhancing learner-learner interaction using video communications in higher education: Implications from theorising about a new model. British Journal Of Educational Technology, 42(1), 113-127. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00990.x Stewart, A. R., Harlow, D. B., & DeBacco, K. (2011). Students’ experience of synchronous learning in distributed environments. Distance Education, 32(3), 357-381. doi:1080/01587919.2011.610289 Svendsen, G. B., Johnsen, J. K., Almås-Sİrensen, L., & Vittersİ, J. (2013). Personality and technology acceptance: the influence of personality factors on the core constructs of the Technology Acceptance Model. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(4), 323-334. doi:1080/01449