Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2017 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 4

Cognitive Load Theory and the Use of Worked Examples as an Instructional Strategy in Physics for Distance Learners: A Preliminary Study

Pages
142–159
Publication Date
2017-10-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This instructional strategy can be applied to similar challenging topics in other well-structured domains in a distance learning environment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article revisits the cognitive load theory to explore the use of worked examples to teach a selected topic in a higher level undergraduate physics course for distance learners at the School of Distance Education, Universiti Sains Malaysia.
📊
Key Findings & Data:With a break of several years from receiving formal education and having only minimum science background, distance learners need an appropriate instructional strategy for courses that require complex conceptualization and mathematical manipulations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This instructional strategy can be applied to similar challenging topics in other well-structured domains in a distance learning environment.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Worked examples · cognitive load theory · instructional strategy

Abstract

This article revisits the cognitive load theory to explore the use of worked examples to teach a selected topic in a higher level undergraduate physics course for distance learners at the School of Distance Education, Universiti Sains Malaysia. With a break of several years from receiving formal education and having only minimum science background, distance learners need an appropriate instructional strategy for courses that require complex conceptualization and mathematical manipulations. As the working memory is limited, distance learners need to acquire domain specific knowledge in stages to lessen cognitive load. This article charts a learning task with a lower cognitive load to teach Fermi-Dirac distribution and demonstrates the use of sequential worked examples. Content taught in stages using worked examples can be presented as a form of didactic conversation to reduce transactional distance. This instructional strategy can be applied to similar challenging topics in other well-structured domains in a distance learning environment.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAW, K. G. (2017). Cognitive Load Theory and the Use of Worked Examples as an Instructional Strategy in Physics for Distance Learners: A Preliminary Study. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 4, 142–159. https://ajindex.com/articles/139919

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 1 – 14. Asraj, A.A., Freeman, M., & Chandler, P.A. (2011). Considering cognitive load theory within e-Learning environments. PACIS 2011 Proceedings Queensland University of Technology, 1 – 13. Catrambone, R. (1998). The subgoal learning model: creating better examples so that students can solve novel problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127(4), 355 - 376. Chi, M.T.H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M.W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: how students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13(1), 145 – 182. Choi, H.H., van Merrienboer, J.J.G., & Paas, F. (2014). Effects of the physical environment on cognitive load learning: Towards a new model of cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review. 26, 225 – 244. Chu, H.C. (2014). Potential negative effects of mobile learning on students’ learning achievement and cognitive load – A format assessment perspective. Educational Technology & Society, 17(1), 332 – 344. Cooper, G. (1990). Cognitive load theory as an aid for instructional design. The Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 6(2), 108-113.
  2. Cooper, G., & Sweller, J. (1987). Effects of schema acquisition and rule automation on mathematical problem-solving transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(4), 347 – 362. de Jong, T. (2010). Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: some food for thought. Instructional Science, 38(2), 105-134.
  3. Holmberg, B. (1983). Guided didactic conversation in distance education. In D. Sewart, D. Keegan, and B. Holmberg (Eds.), Distance Education: International Perspectives (p. 115). London: Croom Helm. 158 Larkin, J., McDermott, J., Simon, D., & Simon, H. (1980). Models of competence in solving physics problems. Cognitive Science, 4(4), 317-348.
  4. LeFevre, J.A., & Dixon, P. (1986). Do written instructions need examples? Cognition and Instruction, 3(1), 1-30.
  5. Leppink, J., Paas, F., van Gog, T., van der Vleuten, C.P.M., van Merrienboer, J.J.G. (2014). Effects of pairs of problems and examples on task performance and different types of cognitive load. Learning and Instruction, 30, 32-42.
  6. Margulieux, L.E., & Catrambone, R. (2016). Improving problem solving with subgoal labels in expository text and worked examples. Learning and Instruction, 42, 58-71. May