Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2015 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 3

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A VIRTUAL FIELD TRIP (VFT) MODULE IN LEARNING BIOLOGY

Pages
102–117
Publication Date
2015-07-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed significant differences in the mean scores of pre and post achievement between students taught using VFT and students who were taught using conventional methods for objective, structure and essay type questions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Virtual Field Trip is a computer aided module of science developed to study the Colonisation and Succession in Mangrove Swamps, as an alternative to the real field trip in Form for Biology.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study was conducted to 60 students employing a quasi-experimental design involving a treatment group taught using the VFT module and a control group who were taught using conventional methods.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed significant differences in the mean scores of pre and post achievement between students taught using VFT and students who were taught using conventional methods for objective, structure and essay type questions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Virtual Field Trip (VFT) · computer-aided learning (CAL) · biology learning

Abstract

Virtual Field Trip is a computer aided module of science developed to study the Colonisation and Succession in Mangrove Swamps, as an alternative to the real field trip in Form for Biology. This study is to identify the effectiveness of the Virtual Field Trip (VFT) module towards the level of achievement in the formative test for this topic. This study was conducted to 60 students employing a quasi-experimental design involving a treatment group taught using the VFT module and a control group who were taught using conventional methods. Analysis into the effectiveness of the virtual module was done descriptively, followed by inferential analysis involving the two-way ANOVA. The results showed significant differences in the mean scores of pre and post achievement between students taught using VFT and students who were taught using conventional methods for objective, structure and essay type questions. The study concluded that teaching and learning by using the VFT module, integrated with ICT, has a positive impact on student achievement whencompared to conventional methods. This study focuses on the use of the VFT recognizing that teachers are often unable to conduct a real field trip on location.

🔖

Cite This Article

HARIS, N., OSMAN, K. (2015). THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A VIRTUAL FIELD TRIP (VFT) MODULE IN LEARNING BIOLOGY. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 3, 102–117. https://ajindex.com/articles/139917

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Abdul, W. I. G., Kamaliah, S. & Hasrina M. (2006). Penggunaan Komputerdalam Pengajaran-Pembelajarandalam Kalangan Guru Sekolah Menengah: SatuKajian Kes di Pulau Pinang. Jurnal Kajian Malaysia, 24(1&2), 203-225.
  2. Attwood, T. K., Selimas. L, Buls, R., Herzog, R., Ladent, V., Ghita, V., Fernandes, F., Marques, I. & Brugman, M. (2005). Report on the Ember Project–a European Multimedia Bioinformatics Educational Resource. Journal BEE-j. Retrieved on February 25, 2013 from http://www.bioscience.heacademy.ac.uk/journal/vol6/beej-6-4.pdf.html
  3. Bitgood, S. (1991). What Do We Know About School Field Trips? Social Education, 62(1), 35 Bitner, N. (1999). The Virtual Trip.Learning and Leading with Technology,26(6), 6-9.
  4. Chuang, L. Y. & Cheng, H. Y. (2005).The Development of Multimedia Courseware for Biotechnology.International Journal of the Computer, the Internet and Management, 13(3), 35-44.
  5. Cram, W. J. (2004). Seeing Mangrove Swamps from a Distance: Development of a Virtual Field Trip. CAL-laborate: United Kingdom. Foley, K. (2003). The Big Pocket Guide to Using & Creating Virtual Field Trips (3rd ed.). Tramline. Gagne, R. M. (1985). The Conditions of Learning and Theory of Instruction. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Hamsiah, S. (2004). TahapKreativiti Guru Sains Dan Amalannya Dalam Pengajaran. Retrieved on February 25, 2013 from http://www.ipbl.edu.my/BM/penyelidikan/jurnalpapers/Jurnal2004/ham2004.pdf
  6. Jackson, R. (2008). Students can Learn on Their Own. Retrieved on February 25, 2013 from http://teacherneedhelp.com/students
  7. Khalidah, A. (2002). Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Keberkesanan Penerapan Proses Sains: Amalan di Kalangan Guru-guru Sains di Daerah Pontian. Master Dissertation, UTM. Law, N. (2009). Mathematics and Science Teachers’ Pedagogical Orientations and Their Use of ICT in Teaching. Education and Information Technologies, 14(4), 309-323.
  8. Lim, T. C. (2007). Hubungan Antara Pendekatan Pengajaran Guru dengan Pendekatan Pembelajaran Pelajar Mata Pelajaran Kimia Tingkatan Empat. Master Dissertation, UTM. Lowe, R. K. (2001). Beyond ‘Eye-Candy’: Improving Learning with Animations. Retrieved on February 25, 2013 from http://auc.Uow.edu.au/conf01/pdf
  9. Mayer, R. E. (2002). Aids to Computer Based Multimedia Learning. Learning and Instruction, 12, 125-139
  10. Mohd, A. A. H., & Othman A. Kassim.(2004). Pemurnian KreativitiDalam PendidikanPrasekolah Sebagai Asas Pembinaan Bangsa Malaysia yang Kreatif: Suatu Kupasan Awal. JurnalKemanusiaan, 27-47.
  11. Mohamad, M. M. S., & Nasr