Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2017 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 4

Influence of Students’ Feedback on the Quality of Adult Higher Distance Education Service Delivery

Pages
160–176
Publication Date
2017-10-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It comprised of overall student satisfaction as the dependent variable and the explanatory variables were given by program management, facilitation, assessment, learner support, systems, resources, program outcomes and subject matter.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The evaluation of a program’s compliance with service delivery and features necessary for the attainment of the programs educational objectives, student outcomes and continuous improvement is an important element in program accreditation and continuous improvement process.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study used a quantitative descriptive statistics analysis of data generated ranging from 2013-2014.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It comprised of overall student satisfaction as the dependent variable and the explanatory variables were given by program management, facilitation, assessment, learner support, systems, resources, program outcomes and subject matter.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2013-2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Distance education · higher education · improvement

Abstract

The evaluation of a program’s compliance with service delivery and features necessary for the attainment of the programs educational objectives, student outcomes and continuous improvement is an important element in program accreditation and continuous improvement process. The study reported in this paper investigated the possible effects of students’ feedback on the improvement of adult higher education distance learning service quality in a South African rural-based university. The study interrogated the service provision factors that seemingly helped in improving the delivery of the program. Such information are vital for planning, good governance, policy formulation, monitoring and evaluation, and for decision-making. The study used a quantitative descriptive statistics analysis of data generated ranging from 2013-2014. It comprised of overall student satisfaction as the dependent variable and the explanatory variables were given by program management, facilitation, assessment, learner support, systems, resources, program outcomes and subject matter. Analytical results were obtained from the Mann Whitney Test. The population consisted of students enrolled in the Advanced Certificate in Education (ACE) program by distance mode. The 313 respondents sampled were randomly selected from a total population of 916 students. Data were collected using a semi-structured questionnaire. The results revealed that service qualities linked to effective management, facilitation, academic support and subject matter delivery were the main qualities that the students recommended for the improvement of the program. It is therefore recommended that adult higher education programs must have a documented systematically utilized and effective process involving program service delivery constituencies like assessment, academic support and resources provided, for the periodic review of the program educational objectives to ensure that the program remains consistent with the institutional mission, needs and criteria.

🔖

Cite This Article

ODUARAN, A. (2017). Influence of Students’ Feedback on the Quality of Adult Higher Distance Education Service Delivery. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 4, 160–176. https://ajindex.com/articles/139909

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Anderson, T. & Dron, J. (2011). Three generations of distance education pedagogy. International review of research in open and distance learning, Volume 12, Number 2. Retrieved 2014/1/23 from http//www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/ 890/1661 Ainley, J. (1999). Using the course experience questionnaire to draw inferences about higher education. Paper presented at the conference on the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, Goteborg, Sweden. Azevedo, R. (2008). The role of self-regulation in learning about science with hypermedia. In: Robinson, D. and Schraw, G. (Eds.). Recent innovations in educational technology that facilitate students’ learning (pp.127-156).
  2. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing. Azevedo, R. (2009). Theoretical, conceptual, methodological, and instructional issues in research on metacognition and self-regulated learning: A discussion. Metacognition and Learning, 2 (2-3), 87-95.
  3. Arubayi, E. A. (1987). Improvement of instruction and teacher effectiveness: Are students’ ratings reliable and valid? Higher Education, 16:267-278.
  4. Babbie, E. R. (1973).
  5. Survey Research Methods. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. Ballantyne, R., Borthwick, J. & Packer, J. (2000). Beyond students’ evaluation of teaching: Identifying and addressing academic staff development needs. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 25: 221-236.
  6. Bentley, Y. (2006). The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom (p.515). New Haven: Yale University Press.
  7. Bentley, Y., Selassie, H. & Shegunshi, A. (2012). Design and evaluation of students’-focused eLearning. The electronic journal of e-Learning, 10 (1): 01-12
  8. Bloch, C. (2002). Managing the emotions of competition and recognition in Academia. In Barbalet, J. (ed.): Emotions and Sociology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. Bramley, T., Bell, J. & Pollitt, A, (1998). Assessing changes in standards over time using Thurstone paired comparisons. Education Research and Perspectives 25:1-24.
  9. Bramley, T., & Gill, T. (2010). Evaluating the rank-ordering method for standard maintaining. Research Papers in Education 25:293-317.
  10. Brooks, D. (2012).
  11. The campus tsunami, New York Times, May 3, http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/04/opinion/brooks-the-campus-tsunami.html.
  12. Buczynski, J. A. (2006). Faculty begins to replace textbooks with “freely” accessible online resources. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 11 (4), (pp.169-179). Routledge.doi:10,1300/J136 Wino.4. Carless, D. (2006). Diff