Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2018 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 4

Social Networking Usage Questionnaire: Development and Validation in an Indian Higher Education Context

Pages
214–227
Publication Date
2018-10-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings revealed that social networking usage can be decomposed into four factors: academic; socialization; entertainment and informativeness.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The concept of social networking has received much attention from academia over the last decade in India.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This paper is an attempt to clarify the construct of social networking by developing a reliable and valid questionnaire measuring social networking usage. 420 university students from 6 universities in Jammu and Kashmir were surveyed via a random sampling technique and factor analysis carried out on their responses.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings revealed that social networking usage can be decomposed into four factors: academic; socialization; entertainment and informativeness.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Social networking usage · university students · scale development

Abstract

The concept of social networking has received much attention from academia over the last decade in India. Widespread research has conceptualized the term social networking with almost all of the studies either conceptual or based on case studies. This paper is an attempt to clarify the construct of social networking by developing a reliable and valid questionnaire measuring social networking usage. 420 university students from 6 universities in Jammu and Kashmir were surveyed via a random sampling technique and factor analysis carried out on their responses. The findings revealed that social networking usage can be decomposed into four factors: academic; socialization; entertainment and informativeness. The internal consistency indices, Cronbach’s alpha of social networking usage (α= .830) indicates good internal reliability. The findings revealed that the newly developed questionnaire has significant psychometric features.

🔖

Cite This Article

GUPTA, S., BASHIR, L. (2018). Social Networking Usage Questionnaire: Development and Validation in an Indian Higher Education Context. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 4, 214–227. https://ajindex.com/articles/139881

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Abdulahi, A., Samadi, B., & Gharleghi, B. (2014). A study on the negative effects of social networking sites such as Facebook among Asia pacific university scholars in Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 5(10), 133-145.
  2. Ahn, J. (2011). The effect of social network sites on adolescents' social and academic development: Current theories and controversies. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 62(8), 1435-1445. American Psychological Association (APA) (2011). Social networking’s good and bad impacts onkids. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/08/1108062038.
  3. Andreassen, C. S., Torsheim, T., Brunborg, G. S., & Pallesen, S. (2012). Development of a Facebook addiction scale. Psych 224 Bove, L. L., Pervan, S. J., Beatty, S. E., & Shiu, E. (2009). Service worker role in encouraging customer organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Business Research, 62(7), 698-705.
  4. Boyd, D. M. (2008). Taken out of context: American teen sociality in networked publics. University of California, Berkeley. Child, D. (1990). The essentials of factor analysis, second edition. London: Cassel Educational Limited. Churchill, G.A. Jr (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 64-73.
  5. Deng, L., & Tavares, N. J. (2013). From Moodle to Facebook: Exploring students' motivation and experiences in online communities. Computers & Education, 68, 167-176.
  6. DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale development: Theory and application (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Dron, J. & Anderson, T. (2007). Collectives, networks and groups in social software for ELearning. In T. Bastiaens & S. Carliner (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2007-- World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 2460-2467).
  7. Quebec City, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Eid, M. I., & Al-Jabri, I. M. (2016). Social networking, knowledge sharing, and student learning: The case of university students. Computers & Education, 99, 14-27.
  8. Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230.
  9. Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168. English