Journals / Research in Educational Administration and Leadership (REAL) / 2018 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

Introduction to Special Issue International Perspectives on Team Leadership

Pages
128–137
Publication Date
2018-12-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In many instances, these protracted efforts altered the conversation about education reform, particularly with regard to reconfiguring how leaders work (Fusarelli, Kowalski, & Petersen, 2011; Hairon, 2017; Nir, 2014).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:During the last several decades, the rise of the global economy launched an array of social, economic, and political changes in nations throughout the world.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These shifts contributed to heightened concern about the quality of schools and resulted in what “arguably is the most intense, comprehensive, and sustained effort to reform education in America’s history” (Björk, 2001, p. 19).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In many instances, these protracted efforts altered the conversation about education reform, particularly with regard to reconfiguring how leaders work (Fusarelli, Kowalski, & Petersen, 2011; Hairon, 2017; Nir, 2014).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Team · leadership

Abstract

During the last several decades, the rise of the global economy launched an array of social, economic, and political changes in nations throughout the world. These shifts contributed to heightened concern about the quality of schools and resulted in what “arguably is the most intense, comprehensive, and sustained effort to reform education in America’s history” (Björk, 2001, p. 19). As policymakers and economists linked academic performance of students to their nation’s long-term economic survival, the scope and duration of educational reform around the globe expanded exponentially (Daun, 2002; Pang, 2013; Zhao, 2009). In retrospect, efforts to ensure national economic wellbeing have been defined by educational policies focused on ensuring broad-based access to schooling (Means, 2018), achieving academic excellence among students (Hanushek, Jamison, Jamison, & Woessman, 2008), networking among schools and students (Bathon, 2011; Glazer & Peurach, 2013), and reconceptualizing schooling (Ball, 2009; Mullen, 2017; Osborne, 2017). In many instances, these protracted efforts altered the conversation about education reform, particularly with regard to reconfiguring how leaders work (Fusarelli, Kowalski, & Petersen, 2011; Hairon, 2017; Nir, 2014).

🔖

Cite This Article

BJÖRK, L. G., BROWNE-FERRİGNO, T. (2018). Introduction to Special Issue International Perspectives on Team Leadership. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership (REAL), Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 128–137. https://ajindex.com/articles/139201

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Alsbury, T. (Ed.). (2008). The future of school board governance: Relevance and revelation. New York, NY: Roman & Littlefield Education. Ball, S. J. (2009). Privatising education, privatizing education policy, privatizing educational research: Network governance and the “competition state.” Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 83-99.
  2. Bathon, J. (2011, October). Model legislation related to online learning opportunities in public elementary and secondary schools. Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center. Björk, L. G. (2001). Preparing the next generation of superintendents: Integrating formal and experiential knowledge. In C. C. Burnner & L. G. Björk (Eds.), The new superintendency: Advances in research and theories of school management and educational policy (pp. 19-54).
  3. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  4. Björk, L. G., & Browne-Ferrigno, T. (2012). Introduction to special issue: International perspectives on school-parent relations. Journal of School Public Relations, 33(1), 4-7.
  5. Björk, L. G., & Browne-Ferrigno, T. (2014). International perspectives on educational reform and superintendent leadership. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 13(4), 357-361.
  6. Björk, L. G., Kowalski, T. J., & Browne-Ferrigno, T. (2014). The school district superintendent in the United States of America. In A. E. Nir (Ed.), The educational superintendent: Between trust and regulation. An international perspective (pp. 17-38).
  7. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science. Browne-Ferrigno, T. (2016). Identifying, developing, and empowering leaders for collective school leadership: Introduction to special issue. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 11(2), 151-157.
  8. Burch, P. E. (2009). Hidden markets: The new education privatization. New York, NY: Routledge. Daun, H. (Ed.). (2002). Educational restructuring in the context of globalization and national policy. New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer. Drysdale, L., Goode, H., & Gurr, D. (2009). An Australian model of successful school leadership: Moving from success to sustainability. Journal of Educational Administration, 47(6), 697–708.
  9. Fusarelli, L. D., Kowalski, T. J., & Petersen, G. J. (2011). Distributive leadership, civic engagement, and deliberative democracy as vehicles for school improvement. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 10(1), 43-62
  10. Glazer, J. L., & Peurach, D. J. (2013). School improvement networks as a strategy for large-scale education reform: The role of educational environments. Educational Policy, 27(4), 676–710.
  11. Hairon, S. (2017). Teacher l