Journals / Research in Educational Administration and Leadership (REAL) / 2016 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1

International Perspectives on the Micropolitics of the Superintendency

Pages
121–156
Publication Date
2016-07-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

An examination of findings from recent nationwide studies on superintendents suggests that decentralization and devolution of decision-making authority to municipal governments, local schools, and parents may have heightened the importance their micropolitical roles in the provision of education.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The rise of globalization compelled national governments to examine how they would adapt widespread social, economic, and political changes to advance their nation’s future wellbeing.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Most recognized the pivotal role of education in facilitating adaptation to changes unfolding in society and expressed concern about the quality of their education systems and student academic performance.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:An examination of findings from recent nationwide studies on superintendents suggests that decentralization and devolution of decision-making authority to municipal governments, local schools, and parents may have heightened the importance their micropolitical roles in the provision of education.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Superintendent · Micropolitics · Decentralization

Abstract

The rise of globalization compelled national governments to examine how they would adapt widespread social, economic, and political changes to advance their nation’s future wellbeing. Most recognized the pivotal role of education in facilitating adaptation to changes unfolding in society and expressed concern about the quality of their education systems and student academic performance. During the last three decades, nations engaged in what is generally regarded as one of the most intense and protracted attempts at educational reform in recent history. National educational reform initiatives initiated in the Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden) and in the United States of America. In many instances, shifts in national education policy altered how school districts were organized, managed, and governed which in turn reconfigured superintendents’ roles. An examination of findings from recent nationwide studies on superintendents suggests that decentralization and devolution of decision-making authority to municipal governments, local schools, and parents may have heightened the importance their micropolitical roles in the provision of education.

🔖

Cite This Article

BJÖRK, L. G., BROWNE-FERRİGNO, T. (2016). International Perspectives on the Micropolitics of the Superintendency. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership (REAL), Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1, 121–156. https://ajindex.com/articles/139178

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Achilles, C. M., & Lintz, M. N. (1983, November). Public confidence in public education: A growing concern in the 80’s. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Nashville, TN. Aho, E., Pitkänen, K., & Sahlberg, P. (2006). Policy development and reform principles of basic and secondary education in Finland since 1968.
  2. Washington, DC: World Bank. Aro, T. (2007). Maassamuuton suuri linja 1880-luvulta lähtien: Savotta-Suomesta Rannikko-Suomeen [The main line of mass migration from the 1880s: From Logging Site Finland to Coast Finland. Kuntapuntari 2/2007]. Statistics Finland. Retrieved from http://www.stat.fi/artikkelit/2007/art_2007-07-13_001.html
  3. Ball, S. J. (1987). The micro-politics of the school: Towards a theory of school organization. New York, NY: Methuen. Ball, S. J. (1994). Education reform: A critical and post-structural approach. Buckingham, United Kingdom: Open University Press.
  4. Balogun, J. (2003). From blaming the middle to harnessing its potential. British Journal of Management, 14, 69-83. Basic Education Act. (1998/628). Retrieved from http://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/1998/en19980628.pdf
  5. Björk, L. (1993). Effective schools-effective superintendents: The emerging instructional leadership role. Journal of school leadership, 3(3), 246-259.
  6. Björk, L. G. (2000). Introduction: Women in the superintendency—Advances in research and theory. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(1), 5-17.
  7. Björk, L, G., & Blase, J. (2009). The micropolitics of school district decentralization. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(3), 196-208.
  8. Björk, L, G., & Browne-Ferrigno, T. (2012). Introduction to special issue: International perspectives on school-parent relations. Journal of School Public Relations, 33(1), 4-7.
  9. Björk, L, G., & Browne-Ferrigno, T. (2014). Introduction: International perspectives on educational reform and superintendent leadership. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 13(4), 357-361.
  10. Björk, L, G., Browne-Ferrigno, T., & Kowalski, T. J. (2014). The superintendent and education reform in the United States of America. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 13(4), 444-465.
  11. Björk, L. G., & Gurley, D. K. (2005). Superintendent as educational statesman and political strategist. In L. G. Björk & T. Kowalski (Eds.), The contemporary superintendent: Preparation, practice, and development (pp.163-185).
  12. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  13. Björk, L, G., Johansson, O., & Bredeson, P. (2014). Intern