Journals / Research in Educational Administration and Leadership (REAL) / 2019 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

Learner or Consumer? Market-Led Higher Education, Diversity, Inclusion, and Equality

Pages
527–552
Publication Date
2019-12-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

By addressing the question of how to respond to the changing profile of all HE students, in terms of the diverse social and cultural capital which they bring with them, (which shapes what and how they want to learn), this paper will challenge some of the prevailing views about student engagement, from the perspective of an academic whose leadership role includes responsibility for developing learning and teaching strategies to ensure student progression, achievement, and graduate outcomes, and for enhancing the quality of the student experience.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper addresses issues associated with leadership in Higher Education (HE), by drawing on research and debate in relation to the role of education in reproducing social inequalities, and on expertise developed through academic leadership roles in British art schools.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It seeks to stimulate discussion about the commodification of HE, which is often perceived as a threat to its accessibility, and therefore to its positive impact in enhancing social mobility, and will argue that it is only a threat if we cling to a culturally conservative belief in value-free learning, which serves only to reproduce the values of the white middle-class intelligentsia.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:By addressing the question of how to respond to the changing profile of all HE students, in terms of the diverse social and cultural capital which they bring with them, (which shapes what and how they want to learn), this paper will challenge some of the prevailing views about student engagement, from the perspective of an academic whose leadership role includes responsibility for developing learning and teaching strategies to ensure student progression, achievement, and graduate outcomes, and for enhancing the quality of the student experience.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Student engagement · Commodification of higher education · Learner-centric pedagogies

Abstract

This paper addresses issues associated with leadership in Higher Education (HE), by drawing on research and debate in relation to the role of education in reproducing social inequalities, and on expertise developed through academic leadership roles in British art schools. It seeks to stimulate discussion about the commodification of HE, which is often perceived as a threat to its accessibility, and therefore to its positive impact in enhancing social mobility, and will argue that it is only a threat if we cling to a culturally conservative belief in value-free learning, which serves only to reproduce the values of the white middle-class intelligentsia. By addressing the question of how to respond to the changing profile of all HE students, in terms of the diverse social and cultural capital which they bring with them, (which shapes what and how they want to learn), this paper will challenge some of the prevailing views about student engagement, from the perspective of an academic whose leadership role includes responsibility for developing learning and teaching strategies to ensure student progression, achievement, and graduate outcomes, and for enhancing the quality of the student experience.

🔖

Cite This Article

PARTİNGTON, A. (2019). Learner or Consumer? Market-Led Higher Education, Diversity, Inclusion, and Equality. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership (REAL), Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 527–552. https://ajindex.com/articles/139141

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Amos, V. & Doku, A. (2019).
  2. Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic Student Attainment at UK Universities: Closing the Gap. UUK/NUS Report. Retrieved from https://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/policy-and-analysis/reports/Documents/2019/bame-student-attainment-uk-universities-closing-the-gap.pdf
  3. Attenborough, J. et al (2018). Undergraduate student views about assessment workload. Educational Developments, 19 (3), 14-16.
  4. Bakhshi, H., Hargreaves, I., & Mateos-Garcia, J. (2013). Manifesto for the Creative Economy. Retrieved from https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/a-manifesto-for-the-creative-economy-april13.pdf
  5. Bakhshi, H. & Yang, L. (2018). Creativity and the future of work. Creative Industries Federation and NESTA. Retrieved from https://www.nesta.org.uk/report/creativity-and-the-future-of-work/
  6. Bazalgette, P. (2017). Independent Review of the Creative Industries. DCMS Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/649980/Indepedent_Review_of_the_Creative_Industries.pdf
  7. Bhagat, D. & O’Neil, P. (2011).
  8. Inclusive Practices, Inclusive Pedagogies: Learning from Widening Participation Research in Art and Design Higher Education. London: CHEAD. Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32 (3), 347- 364. BIS (2016). Success as a Knowledge Economy: Teaching Excellence, Social Mobility, and Student Choice. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/higher-education-success-as-a-knowledge-economy-white-paper
  9. Blair, B. (2007). At the end of a huge crit in the summer, it was “crap” – I’d worked really hard but all she said was “fine” and I was gutted. Art, Design and Communication in Higher Education, 5 (2), 83-95.
  10. Bourdieu, P. (1984). The Aristocracy of Culture. Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge. Brown, S. (1995). Postmodern marketing. London: Routledge. Burke, P. J. & McManus, J. (2009). Art for a few: exclusion and misrecognition in art and design higher education admissions. London: National Arts Learning Network. Caves, R. (2000). The Creative Industries: Contracts between art and commerce. London: Harvard University Press.
  11. Cox, G. (2005). Cox Review of Creativity in Business. HM Treasury. Retrieved from https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20120704143146/http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/d/Cox_review-foreword-definition-terms-exec-summary.pdf
  12. Curran, R. (2018). A meeting of minds: the impact of partnership wo