AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI InsightThis paper examines the dichotomy of school leadership, brought about and sustained by national political actions which, although professing to ‘futures’ orientated, appears in conflict with quality school leadership and outcomes consistent with social justice.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
Abstract
Globally, schools continue to face ongoing reductions in budgetary allocations, increase in student numbers, performativity pressures and high stakes accountability. Like it or not, schools/ school leaders are operating in rapidly changing national educational policy contexts that are demanding more from less and a much greater contribution to national economic development – leaving some commentators and school leaders alike to suggest that schools are being reoriented towards national economic development and less towards social transformation, a fundamental aim of education as set out in the United Nations convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC). This widening dichotomy is the site for several tensions occasioned by the approach to educational policymaking, and the policy apparatus of national governments, played out in schools, where school leaders are caught between implementing government policy, delivering an education to students that equips them to reap the espoused benefits of education, and keeping staff engaged and motivated. How do school leaders lead for social justice in contexts where educational policy appear out of sync with social justice principles? How do school leaders lead in contexts where the good of the national ‘community’ appears to supersede the good of local communities and individuals? This paper examines the dichotomy of school leadership, brought about and sustained by national political actions which, although professing to ‘futures’ orientated, appears in conflict with quality school leadership and outcomes consistent with social justice.