SavedAdd your journal

Journals / EĞİTİM VE İNSANİ BİLİMLER DERGİSİ: TEORİ VE UYGULAMA / 2025 / Cilt: 16 Sayı: 32

The Role of the Impostor Phenomenon in the Relationship between Abusive Supervision and Affective Commitment

Sahtekârlık Fenomeninin Yıkıcı Yönetim ile Duygusal Bağlılık Arasındaki İlişkideki Rolü

Seda Güğerçin(İSKENDERUN TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-8338-7903
Gaye Onan(MERSİN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-6302-5211
Pages
379–404
Publication Date
2025-12-19
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicated that abusive supervision negatively predicts affective commitment and positively predicts the impostor phenomenon.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to examine the relationships among abusive supervision, the impostor phenomenon, and affective commitment within the framework of the Conservation of Resources Theory.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study sample consisted of 335 teachers working in Adana, Türkiye, who voluntarily participated in an online survey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicated that abusive supervision negatively predicts affective commitment and positively predicts the impostor phenomenon.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:duygusal bağlılık · yıkıcı yönetim · sahtekarlık fenomeni

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the relationships among abusive supervision, the impostor phenomenon, and affective commitment within the framework of the Conservation of Resources Theory. A quantitative correlational and cross-sectional research design was employed. The study sample consisted of 335 teachers working in Adana, Türkiye, who voluntarily participated in an online survey. Data were collected using three validated scales: the Abusive Supervision Scale, the Impostor Phenomenon Scale, and the Affective Commitment Scale. Confirmatory factor analysis and PROCESS macro for SPSS were applied to test mediation and moderation effects. The results indicated that abusive supervision negatively predicts affective commitment and positively predicts the impostor phenomenon. Moreover, the impostor phenomenon partially mediated and significantly moderated the relationship between abusive supervision and affective commitment. These findings highlight the dual psychological role of impostor feelings as both a mechanism and boundary condition in explaining how abusive supervision weaken employees’ affective commitment with their organizations.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, yıkıcı yönetim, sahtekârlık fenomeni ve duygusal bağlılık arasındaki ilişkileri ortaya koymaktır. Duygusal bağlılık, çalışanların örgüte karşı duygusal olarak bağlanmalarını, aidiyet ve sadakat hissetmelerini ifade eden kritik bir örgütsel bağlılık boyutudur. Yıkıcı yönetim ve sahtekârlık fenomeni gibi faktörler, duygusal bağlılık üzerinde ciddi olumsuz etkilere yol açarak örgütsel verimliliği tehdit edebilmektedir. Çalışmada, yıkıcı yönetimin sahtekârlık fenomeni aracılığıyla çalışanların duygusal bağlılıklarını nasıl etkilediği, kaynakları koruma teorisi (COR) çerçevesinde ele alınmıştır. Araştırmanın verileri Adana ilinde görev yapan 335 öğretmenden anket aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Değişkenler arasındaki doğrudan ve dolaylı ilişkileri incelemek için aracılık ve düzenleyicilik analizleri uygulanmıştı. Elde edilen bulgular, hem yıkıcı yönetimin hem de sahtekârlık fenomeninin öğretmenlerin duygusal bağlılık düzeylerini anlamlı ve olumsuz yönde etkilediğini göstermektedir. Yıkıcı yönetim davranışlarının, çalışanlarda yeterlilik algısını zedeleyerek sahtekârlık fenomenini tetiklediği, bunun da duygusal bağlılık üzerinde dolaylı olumsuz etkilere yol açtığı saptanmıştır. Ayrıca sahtekârlık fenomeninin, yıkıcı yönetim ile duygusal bağlılık arasındaki ilişkide hem kısmi aracılık hem de düzenleyicilik işlevi gördüğü belirlenmiştir. Bu bulgular, çalışanların örgütsel bağlılığının hem yönetim tarafından sergilenen tutumlar hem de bu tutumların tetiklediği bireysel psikolojik süreçler tarafından şekillendiğini göstermektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

Güğerçin, S., Onan, G. (2025). The Role of the Impostor Phenomenon in the Relationship between Abusive Supervision and Affective Commitment. EĞİTİM VE İNSANİ BİLİMLER DERGİSİ: TEORİ VE UYGULAMA, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 32, 379–404. https://doi.org/10.58689/eibd.1761038

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (63)

  1. Aasland, M. S., Skogstad, A., Notelaers, G., Nielsen, M. B., & Einarsen, S. (2010). The prevalence of destructive leadership behavior. British Journal of Management, 21(2), 438–452. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00672.x
  2. Akın, A., Yalniz, A., Akin, Ü., & Ozcelik, B. (2015). Sahtekarlık ölçeği Türkçe formu: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Akademik Bakış Uluslararası Hakemli Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 50, 309–315.
  3. Aksay, B., & Gugercin, U. (2016). Yıkıcı yönetimin izlenim yönetimi taktikleri üzerindeki etkisi: Beyaz yakalı çalışanlar üzerine bir araştırma. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 25(3), 441–456.
  4. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49, 155–173. doi:10.1007/BF02294170
  5. Aparna, K. H., & Menon, P. (2020). Impostor syndrome: An integrative framework of its antecedents, consequences and moderating factors on sustainable leader behaviors. European Journal of Training and Development, 46(9), 847–860. doi:10.1108/EJTD-07-2019-0138
  6. Aryee, S., Chen, Z. X., Sun, L. Y., & Debrah, Y. A. (2007). Antecedents and outcomes of AS: Test of a trickle-down model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 191. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.191
  7. Aryee, S., Sun, L. Y., Chen, Z. X. G., & Debrah, Y. A. (2008). AS and contextual performance: The mediating role of emotional exhaustion and the moderating role of work unit structure. Management and Organization Review, 4(3), 393–411. doi:10.1111/j.1740-8784.2008.00118.x
  8. Badawy, R. L., Gazdag, B. A., Bentley, J. R., & Brouer, R. L. (2018). Are all impostors created equal? Exploring gender differences in IP-performance link. Personality and Individual Differences, 131, 156–163. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2018.04.044
  9. Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323
  10. Bortolan, A. (2018). Self‐esteem and ethics: A phenomenological view. Hypatia, 33(1), 56–72. doi:10.1111/hypa.12388
  11. Byrnes, K. D., & Lester, D. (1995). The imposter phenomenon in teachers and accountants. Psychological Reports, 77(1), 350. doi:10.2466/pr0.1995.77.1.350
  12. Chakraverty, D., & Rishi, M. (2022). IP and discipline-specific experiences of violence in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Violence and Gender, 9(1), 22–29. doi:10.1089/vio.2021.0025
  13. Churchill, G. A., Jr. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64–73. doi:10.1177/002224377901600110
  14. Clance, P. R. (1985). The imposter phenomenon: Overcoming the fear that haunts your success. Peachtree.
  15. Clance, P. R., & Imes, S. A. (1978). The imposter phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 15(3), 241. doi:10.1037/h0086006
  16. Clance, P. R., Dingman, D., Reviere, S. L., & Stober, D. R. (1995). IP in an interpersonal/social context: Origins and treatment. Women & Therapy, 16(4), 79–96. doi:10.1300/J015v16n04_07
  17. Dağlı, A., Elçiçek, Z., & Han, B. (2018). Örgütsel bağlılık ölçeği'nin Türkçeye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 17(68). doi:10.17755/esosder.445932
  18. Fazio, J., Gong, B., Sims, R., & Yurova, Y. (2017). The role of AC in the relationship between social support and turnover intention. Management Decision, 55(3), 512–525. doi:10.1108/MD-05-2016-0338
  19. Fischer, A. R., & Holz, K. B. (2007). Perceived discrimination and women’s psychological distress: The roles of collective and personal self-esteem. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54(2), 154–164. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.54.2.154
  20. Garcia, L. G. (2019). Am I enough?: IP and organizational commitment (Master’s thesis, Azusa Pacific University, California). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2275062892?
  21. Gardner, R. G., Bednar, J. S., Stewart, B. W., Oldroyd, J. B., & Moore, J. (2019). I must have slipped through the cracks somehow: An examination of coping with perceived impostorism and the role of social support. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 115, 103337. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2019.103337
  22. Grubb, W. L., & McDowell, W. C. (2012). The imposter phenomenon’s impact on citizenship behavior and employee commitment: Flying under the radar. Journal of Business Issues, 1(1), 1–10.
  23. Guan, B., & Hsu, C. (2020). The role of AS and organizational commitment on employees' information security policy noncompliance intention. Internet Research, 30(5), 1383–1405. doi:10.1108/INTR-06-2019-0260
  24. Gugercin, S., & Cavus, M. F. (2021a). Yıkıcı yönetim, sanal kaytarma ve işteki üretkenlik: Banka çalışanları üzerine bir araştırma. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 9(1), 164–185. doi:10.15295/bmij.v9i1.1745
  25. Gugercin, S., & Cavus, M. F. (2021b). Yıkıcı yönetim algısı: Demografik değişkenlere göre bankacılık sektöründe bir araştırma. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(2), 1523–1537. doi:10.20491/isarder.2021.1213
  26. Gullifor, D. P., Gardner, W. L., Karam, E. P., Noghani, F., & Cogliser, C. C. (2023). IP at work: A systematic evidence‐based review, conceptual development, and agenda for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior. Advance online publication. doi:10.1002/job.2733
  27. Guthrie, R. (2006). Teachers and stress. Australia & New Zealand Journal of Law & Education, 11(1), 5–18.
  28. Haar, J., & De Jong, K. (2024). Imposter phenomenon and employee mental health: What role do organizations play? Personnel Review, 53(1), 211–227. doi:10.1108/PR-01-2022-0030
  29. Habagat, J. B. A., Lucido, J. B., & Ching, D. A. (2024). Effect of leadership practices of school heads in mentoring teachers as key to organizational commitment. TWIST, 19(4), 22–26. doi:10.5281/zenodo.10049652#307
  30. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2005). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
  31. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. doi:10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
  32. Halliday, T. (2018). Unmasking: The coach’s guide to imposter syndrome. Rethink Press.
  33. Harvey, P., Stoner, J., Hochwarter, W., & Kacmar, C. (2007). Coping with AS: The neutralizing effects of ingratiation and positive affect on negative employee outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 264–280. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.03.008
  34. Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
  35. Hobfoll, S. E. (2001). The influence of culture, community, and the nested‐self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology, 50(3), 337–421. doi:10.1111/1464-0597.00062
  36. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
  37. Hutchins, H. M., Penney, L. M., & Sublett, L. W. (2018). What imposters risk at work: Exploring imposter phenomenon, stress coping, and job outcomes. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 29(1), 31–48. doi:10.1002/hrdq.21304
  38. Ibrahim, F., Göddertz, D., & Herzberg, P. Y. (2023). An experimental study of the non-self-serving attributional bias within IP and its relation to the fixed mindset. Current Psychology, 42(30), 26440–26449. doi:10.1007/s12144-022-03486-0
  39. Kashif, M., Petrovskaya, I., Samad, S., & Wijenayake, S. (2021). Leaving in mascot of silence: Organizational determinants of employee turnover intentions in mediating and moderating roles of quiescent silence and coworker support in a Russian context. Central European Management Journal, 29, 121–146. doi:10.7206/cemj.2658-0845.48
  40. Leary, M. R., Patton, K. M., Orlando, A. E., & Funk, W. W. (2000). IP: Self-perceptions, reflected appraisals, and interpersonal strategies. Journal of Personality, 68(4), 725–755. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00114
  41. Mackinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1), 99–128. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4
  42. McDowell, W. C., Boyd, N. G., & Bowler, W. M. (2007). Overreward and IP. Journal of Managerial Issues, 19, 95–110. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40601195
  43. Mercurio, Z. A. (2015). AC as a core essence of organizational commitment: An integrative literature review. Human Resource Development Review, 14(4), 389–414. doi:10.1177/1534484315603612
  44. Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 538. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.538
  45. Neureiter, M., & Traut-Mattausch, E. (2016). Inspecting the dangers of feeling like a fake: An empirical investigation of IP in the world of work. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1445. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01445
  46. Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544. doi:10.1177/014920638601200408
  47. Rifai, H. A. (2005). A test of the relationships among perceptions of justice, job satisfaction, AC and organizational citizenship behavior. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 7(2), 131–154.
  48. Sezici, E. (2016). İzleyicilerin yıkıcı liderlik algısı ve sonuçları. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, (47), 106–121.
  49. Shen, C., Zhang, Y., Yang, J., & Liu, S. (2020). AS and employee creativity: A moderated mediation model. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(2), 193–207. doi:10.1108/LODJ-03-2019-0146
  50. Song, X., & Whitman, M. (2024). It’s not you, it’s me: Investigating the consequences of AS and the moderating role of impostorism. The International Trade Journal, 38(1), 6–30. doi:10.1080/08853908.2023.2273881
  51. Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of AS. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 178–190. doi:10.5465/1556375
  52. Tepper, B. J. (2007). Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 33(3), 261–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307300812
  53. Tepper, B. J., Duffy, M. K., Henle, C. A., & Lambert, L. S. (2006). Procedural injustice, victim precipitation, and AS. Personnel Psychology, 59(1), 101–123. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00725.x
  54. Tepper, B. J., Henle, C. A., Lambert, L. S., Giacalone, R. A., & Duffy, M. K. (2008). AS and subordinates' organization deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 721. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.721
  55. Tewfik, B. A., Yip, J. A., & Martin, S. R. (2024). Workplace impostor thoughts, impostor feelings, and impostorism: An integrative, multidisciplinary review of research on IP. Academy of Management Annals. Advance online publication. doi:10.5465/annals.2023.0100
  56. Tillman, C. J., Gonzalez, K., Crawford, W. S., & Lawrence, E. R. (2018). Affective responses to abuse in the workplace: The role of hope and AC. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 26(1), 57–65. doi:10.1111/ijsa.12203
  57. Ulbegi, İ. D., Ozgen, H. M., & Ozgen, H. (2014). Türkiye’de istismarcı yönetim ölçeğinin uyarlaması: Güvenirlik ve geçerlik analizi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 23(1), 1–12.
  58. Vandenberghe, C., Bentein, K., & Stinglhamber, F. (2004). AC to the organization, supervisor, and work group: Antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64(1), 47–71. doi:10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00029-0
  59. Vergauwe, J., Wille, B., Feys, M., De Fruyt, F., & Anseel, F. (2015). Fear of being exposed: The trait-relatedness of IP and its relevance in the work context. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30, 565–581. doi:10.1007/s10869-014-9382-5
  60. Xu, A. J., Loi, R., & Lam, L. W. (2015). The bad boss takes it all: How AS and leader–member exchange interact to influence employee silence. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(5), 763–774. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.03.002
  61. Yu, K., Lin, W., Wang, L., Ma, J., Wei, W., Wang, H., & Shi, J. (2016). The role of AC and future work self salience in the AS–job performance relationship. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 89(1), 28–45. doi:10.1111/joop.12101
  62. Zang, D., Liu, C., & Jiao, Y. (2021). AS, AC, customer orientation, and proactive customer service performance: Evidence from hotel employees in China. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 648090. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.648090
  63. Zhang, Y., & Bednall, T. C. (2016). Antecedents of abusive supervision: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(3), 455-471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2657-6