Journals / Sakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 14

Does Big Bang Theory Support Kalam Cosmological Argument?

BÜYÜK PATLAMA TEORİSİ KELM KOZMOLOJİ ARGÜMANINI DESTEKLER Mİ?

Pages
89–109
Publication Date
2006-12-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

I supportthis claim by appealing to the equivocal use of the term universe in physical sciencesand in religious or philosophical literature and to the lack of data beyond the Planckera.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:One type of cosmological argument appeals to the idea that the universe began to exist.This argument was originally devised by medieval Muslim theologians.
📊
Key Findings & Data:William LaneCraig reintroduced their argument from the beginning of the universe as the Kalam cosmologicalargument.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:I supportthis claim by appealing to the equivocal use of the term universe in physical sciencesand in religious or philosophical literature and to the lack of data beyond the Planckera.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kozmolojik argüman · Tanrı’nın varlığı · büyük patlama

Abstract

One type of cosmological argument appeals to the idea that the universe began to exist.This argument was originally devised by medieval Muslim theologians. William LaneCraig reintroduced their argument from the beginning of the universe as the Kalam cosmologicalargument. On the basis of the standard big bang model, Craig attempts to supportthe premise that the universe began to exist. I argue against Craig's view, and defendthat the scientific data does not show that the universe began to exist. I supportthis claim by appealing to the equivocal use of the term universe in physical sciencesand in religious or philosophical literature and to the lack of data beyond the Planckera.

Özet

One type of cosmological argument appeals to the idea that the universe began to exist.This argument was originally devised by medieval Muslim theologians. William LaneCraig reintroduced their argument from the beginning of the universe as the Kalam cosmologicalargument. On the basis of the standard big bang model, Craig attempts to supportthe premise that the universe began to exist. I argue against Craig's view, and defendthat the scientific data does not show that the universe began to exist. I supportthis claim by appealing to the equivocal use of the term universe in physical sciencesand in religious or philosophical literature and to the lack of data beyond the Planckera.

🔖

Cite This Article

ACAR, R. (2006). Does Big Bang Theory Support Kalam Cosmological Argument?. Sakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 14, 89–109. https://ajindex.com/articles/138964

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...