SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 19

Debates about the Religious Place of the Prophet Muhammad's Father and Mother with Special Reference to the Thought of Abu Hanifa

HZ. PEYGAMBER’İN ANNE-BABASININ (EBEVEYN-i RESÛL) DîNÎ KONUMUNA DAİR EBÛ HANÎFE’YE ATFEDİLEN GÖRÜŞ ETRAFINDAKİ TARTIŞMALAR

Mustafa AKÇAY
Pages
1–27
Publication Date
2009-06-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus, such difference led to the emergence of diverse comments and interpretations about what the Abu Hanifah‟s views on the matter was.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Prophet Muhammad (PBUH)‟s father Abdullah and mother Amina had lived in the era of jahiliyya (the age of ignorance), i.e. before the revelation of Islam.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Their religious status was wondered by both the Messenger Muhammad (PBUH) and his companions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, such difference led to the emergence of diverse comments and interpretations about what the Abu Hanifah‟s views on the matter was.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:: the Messenger Muhammad · Amina · Abdullah

Abstract

Prophet Muhammad (PBUH)‟s father Abdullah and mother Amina had lived in the era of jahiliyya (the age of ignorance), i.e. before the revelation of Islam. Their religious status was wondered by both the Messenger Muhammad (PBUH) and his companions. The issue took shape as a matter of belief and ethics and persisted till today generating a literature on this topic. Imam Abu Hanifah‟s words revealing his thoughts on the religious status of the Messenger‟s parent became an important reference for the subsequent scholars of Islam. His exact wording on the matter varied in the copies of al-Fiqh al-Akbar. Thus, such difference led to the emergence of diverse comments and interpretations about what the Abu Hanifah‟s views on the matter was.

Özet

Prophet Muhammad (PBUH)‟s father Abdullah and mother Amina had lived in the era of jahiliyya (the age of ignorance), i.e. before the revelation of Islam. Their religious status was wondered by both the Messenger Muhammad (PBUH) and his companions. The issue took shape as a matter of belief and ethics and persisted till today generating a literature on this topic. Imam Abu Hanifah‟s words revealing his thoughts on the religious status of the Messenger‟s parent became an important reference for the subsequent scholars of Islam. His exact wording on the matter varied in the copies of al-Fiqh al-Akbar. Thus, such difference led to the emergence of diverse comments and interpretations about what the Abu Hanifah‟s views on the matter was.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKÇAY, M. (2009). Debates about the Religious Place of the Prophet Muhammad's Father and Mother with Special Reference to the Thought of Abu Hanifa. Sakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 19, 1–27. https://ajindex.com/articles/138774

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Adil Bebek- Şerafettin Gölcük, DİA, “el-Fıkhu’l-ekber” md., XII, 544- 546,İst. 1995. Abdülahad Nûrî, Te’dîbü’l-mütemerridîn, Süleymaniye Ktp. Fatih, nr. 5293. Abdülazîz Buhârî, Keşfu’l-esrâr (nşr. Hasan Hilmi Rizevî), Mektebetü‟s- sanâi„, 1307. Ahmed b. Hanbel, Müsned, Çağrı Yay., İst., 1413/1992. Ali el-Kârî, Edilletü’l-mu‘takadi Ebî Hanîfe fî Ebeveyi’r-resûl, Süleymaniye Ktp. Yahya Tevfik, nr. 1736/444. …………., Şerh ‘ale’l-Fıkhı’l-ekber, II. baskı, İst., 1375/1955. …………., Şerhu’ş-Şifâ, Hacı Muharrem Efendi Matbaası, İst., Rûmî 1291. Beyâzîzâde, Usûlü’l-münîfe li’l- İmam Ebî Hanîfe (nşr. İlyas Çelebi), İst., 1996. Cengiz Gündoğdu, „XVII. Yüzyılda Tekke-Medrese Münasebetleri Açısından Sivâsîler-Kadızâdeliler Mücadelesi‟, İLAM. Araştırma Dergisi, III/1, s. 37-72, İst. 1998. Ebû Dâvûd, Sünen, Çağrı Yay., İst., 1413/1992. Ebû Hanîfe, el-Fıkhu’l-ekber, Süleymaniye Ktp., Kasidecizâde, nr. 682/2. …………., el-Fıkhu’l-ekber, Medine Melik Abdülaziz Kütüphanesi, Ârif Hikmet Kütüphanesi, Mecmûatü’r-resâil, nr. 172. Ebü’l-Müntehâ, Şerhu’l-Fıkhu’l-ekber, Mektebetü Melik Abdülaziz, el- Medinetü‟l-münevvere, Mecmûatü Mektebeti Ârif Hikmet, nr. 363. …………, Şerhu’l-Fıkhı’l-ekber, s. 30, İst., ts. H. Bekir Karlığa, DİA. “Gazzalî” md., XII,518-524, İst. 1996.
  2. Halil İbrahim Kutluay, İmâm Aliyyu’l-Kârî ve eseruhû fî ‘ilmi’l-hadîs, Bey- rut, 1408/1987.
  3. Hatip Kasımoğlu, Enbâu’l-Istıfâ fî Hakkı Âbâi’l-Mustafâ, Süleymaniye Ktp. Çelebi Abdullah, nr. 405. İbnü’l-Cezerî, er-Risâletü’l-beyâniyye, Süleymaniye Ktp., Pertev Paşa, nr. 603. İbn Kesîr, Tefsir, I, 162, Beyrut, 1982.
  4. İlyas Çelebi, İmam-ı A„zam Ebû Hanîfe‟nin İtikadî Görüşleri, İFAV, İst. 1996. Kâtip Çelebi, Mîzânu’l-hak fî ihtiyâri’l-ehakk (sad. Süleyman Uludağ- Mustafa Kara, İslâm’da Tenkit ve Tartışma Usulü), Marifet Yay., İst. 1990. Kemâl Paşazâde, Fî Hakkı Ebevey’in-Nebî (nşr. Ahmed Cevdet, Resâil- i İbn Kemâl içinde), İst. h. 1316. Kurtubî, el-Câmi‘u li ahkâmi’l-Kur’ân, II, 92, Beyrut, 1965. Muhammed b. Bahâuddin, el-Kavlu’l-fasl, Hakikat Kitabevi, İst., 1990.
  5. Metin Yurdagür, İslâm Düşüncesinde Fetret Kavramı, II.baskı, İst., 1998. …………………., DİA, “Fetret” md., XII, 475-480, İst. 1995.
  6. Mustafa Akçay, Ebeveyn-i Resûl Risâleleri, Yeni Akademi Yay., İzmir, Mayıs/2005.
  7. Mustafa Öz, İmam-ı Azam’ın Beş Eseri, İFAV, İst. 1992. Murtazâ ez-Zebîdî, el-İntisâr fî Vâlideyi’l-Muhtâr (Ikdü’l-Cevheri’s-semîn adlı Mecmûatu‟r-resâil içinde )., ts. Müslim, es-Sahih, Çağrı Yay., İst., 1413/1992.
  8. Salahaddin el-Müneccid, Mu‘cemu mâ üllife ‘an Resû