SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 20

The Term “al-Tafsir al-Riwa’î” and Exegesis by Means of the Qur’an: A Critical Approach

'RİVAYET TEFSİRİ' KAVRAMI VE KUR'AN'IN KUR'AN İLE TEFSİRİ: ELEŞTİREL BİR YAKLAŞIM

Muhammed AYDIN
Pages
1–22
Publication Date
2009-06-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In theend this paper shall aim to lay down the sound principles and foundations on which the use ofal-tafsir al-riwa'î has to be based.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This essay deals with the concept of al-tafseer al-riwa'î (the narrated exegesis) in the use ofcontemporary Muslim scholars; it shall argue that the term at-tafsir ar-riwa'i is not an obviousand consistent term as far as the classical tafsir tradition is concerned.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study shall alsoexamine and assess the views forwarded in favor of the viability of of at-tafsir ar-riwa'i.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In theend this paper shall aim to lay down the sound principles and foundations on which the use ofal-tafsir al-riwa'î has to be based.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Rivayet tefsiri · Kur’an’ın Kur’an’la tefsiri · Hz. Peygamber

Abstract

This essay deals with the concept of al-tafseer al-riwa'î (the narrated exegesis) in the use ofcontemporary Muslim scholars; it shall argue that the term at-tafsir ar-riwa'i is not an obviousand consistent term as far as the classical tafsir tradition is concerned. The study shall alsoexamine and assess the views forwarded in favor of the viability of of at-tafsir ar-riwa'i. In theend this paper shall aim to lay down the sound principles and foundations on which the use ofal-tafsir al-riwa'î has to be based.

Özet

This essay deals with the concept of al-tafseer al-riwa'î (the narrated exegesis) in the use ofcontemporary Muslim scholars; it shall argue that the term at-tafsir ar-riwa'i is not an obviousand consistent term as far as the classical tafsir tradition is concerned. The study shall alsoexamine and assess the views forwarded in favor of the viability of of at-tafsir ar-riwa'i. In theend this paper shall aim to lay down the sound principles and foundations on which the use ofal-tafsir al-riwa'î has to be based.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDIN, M. (2009). The Term “al-Tafsir al-Riwa’î” and Exegesis by Means of the Qur’an: A Critical Approach. Sakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 20, 1–22. https://ajindex.com/articles/138767

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Abdullah, Müslim, Eseru’t-Tatavvuri’l-Fikri fi’t-Tefsiri fi’l-Asri’l-Abbasi, (Çev. Muhammed Çelik), Çağlayan Matbaası, İzmir, 2006.
  2. Akk, Halit Abdurrahman, Usûlü’t-Tefsir ve Kavaiduhu, Daru’n-Nefâis, Beyrût 1986.
  3. Albayrak, Halis, Kur’ân’ın Bütünlüğü Üzerine, Şûle yayınları, İstanbul 1993.
  4. Ali Özek ve diğ., Kur’an-ı Kerim ve Türkçe Açıklamalı Meali, Medine Baskısı, ts. Aydın, Muhammed, “Âyetleri Yorumlamada Düşülen Hatalar Üzerine Bir İnceleme”, SAÜ İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 4 (2001), s. 113-43.
  5. Aydüz, Davut, Tefsir Tarihi, Çeşitleri ve Konulu Tefsir, Işık Yay., İstanbul 2004. Begavî, Hüseyin b. Mes’ud, Meâlimu’t-Tenzîl, Dâru’l Ma’rife, Beyrût, 1987. Buharî, Muhammed b. İsmail, Sahîhu’l-Buharî, Daru İbn Kesîr, Beyrut 1987.
  6. Bilmen, Ömer Nasuhi, Büyük Tefsir Tarihi, Bilmen Kitabevi, ts. Cerrahoğlu, İsmail, Tefsir Tarihi, Fecr Yayınları, Ankara 1996.
  7. Cerrahoğlu, İsmail, Tefsir Usûlü, D.İ.B Yayınları, Ankara, 1995. Cevherî, İsmail b. Hammad, Tacu’l Lûga ve Sıhâhu’l Arabiyye, (thk.Attâr, Ahmed Abdulğafûr), Dâru’l- Ulûm li’l-Melâyîn, 1983.
  8. Demirci, Muhsin, Tefsir Usûlü ve Tarihi, Marmara Üniv İlahiyat Fak Vakfı Yay, İstanbul 1998.
  9. Derveze, İzzet, Kur’ânu’l-Mecîd, (trc. Vahdettin İnce), Ekin Yay, İstanbul 1997. Ebû Hayyan, el-Bahru’l-Muhît, el-Mektebetü’t-ticariyye, Mekke, ts. Fazlurrahman, Ana Konularıyla Kur’ân, (Çev. Alparslan Açıkgenç), Ankara 1987. Gazâlî, Muhammed b. Muhammed, Ebû Hamid, İhyâu Ulûmi’d-Dîn, Mısır, ts. Hakim, Muhammed b. Abdullah, el-Müstedrek Ala’s-Sahiheyn, Daru’l-Kütübi’l-İlmiyye, Beyrut 1990. İbn Aşûr, Muhammed Tahir, et-Tahrîr ve’t-Tenvîr, ed-Dâru’t Tunisiyye, Tunus, 1984.
  10. İbn Kesir, Tefsiru’l-Kur’ani’l-Azîm, Daru Taybe, Medine 1999.
  11. İbn Teymiye, Ahmed b. Abdulhalim, el-Mukaddime fi Usûli’t-Tefsir, Daru’s-Sahabeti li’t-Türâs, Kahire Karaçam, İsmail, En Büyük Mucize, Yeni Şafak Yay., İstanbul 2005.
  12. Kattan, Menna’ Halil, Mebâhis fî Ulûmi’l-Kur’an, Mektebetü’l-Meârif, Riyad 1992.
  13. Koç, M. Akif, İsnad Verileri Çerçevesinde Erken Dönem Tefsir Faaliyetleri: İbn Ebî Hâtim Tefsiri Örneğinde Bir Literatür İncelemesi, Kitâbiyât, Ankara, 2003. Kurtubî, Muhammed b. Ahmed, el-Cami’ li Ahkâmi’l-Kur’ân, Dâru’ş Şa’b, Kahire, 1953. Râzî, Fahruddin, Muhammed b. Ömer, Mefâtîhu’l Gayb (et-Tefsîru’l-Kebîr), Dâru’l Fikr, Beyrût, 1981. Sabûni, M. Ali, et-Tibyan fî Ulûmi’l-Kur’an, Mektebetü’l-Gazalî, Beyrût 1981.
  14. Salih, Suphî, Mebâhis fî Ulûmi’l-Kur’an, (Terc. M. Said Şimşek), Hibaş Yayınları Konya, ts. Sicistânî, Ebû Dâvûd, Süleyman b. Eş’as, Sünen, (thk.Muhyi