SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 23

Fine Arts Education Students’ Motivation and Achievement Levels in Teacher Education

Güzel Sanatlar Eğitimi Öğrencilerinin Öğretmenlik Meslek Bilgisi Derslerine İlişkin Motivasyon ve Başarı Düzeyleri

Sevgi Özgüngör
Şahin Kapıkıran
Pages
47–60
Publication Date
2008-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The low task value placed to pedacological courses was negatively related to instrinsic motivation and deep strategy use.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to determine the achievement levels, and the factors affecting the achievement of the students in the departments of Teaching Music and Teaching Art in pedacological courses.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The findings of the study revealed that students in Teaching Music and Teaching Arts had lower grades in pedacological courses than the students in other areas of teaching.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The low task value placed to pedacological courses was negatively related to instrinsic motivation and deep strategy use.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Güzel Sanatlar Eğitimi · Akademik Başarı · Içsel Motivasyon.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the achievement levels, and the factors affecting the achievement of the students in the departments of Teaching Music and Teaching Art in pedacological courses. The findings of the study revealed that students in Teaching Music and Teaching Arts had lower grades in pedacological courses than the students in other areas of teaching. The analysis made to understand why these diferences were found showed that students in Teaching Music and Teaching Arts had lower task value in pedacological courses. The low task value placed to pedacological courses was negatively related to instrinsic motivation and deep strategy use.

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı Güzel Sanatlar Eğitimi lisan programına devam eden öğrencilerin öğretmenlik meslek bilgisi derslerindeki başarı durumlarının ve başarılarına etki eden etkenlerin belirlenmesidir. Araştırmanın ilk aşamasında Güzel Sanatlar Eğitimi öğretmenliği lisans programlarına devam eden öğrencilerin öğretmenlik meslek bilgisi derslerine ilişkin başarı puanlarının diğer bölüm öğrencilerinin başarı puanlarından düşük olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bu bulguların olası nedenlerine ışık tutmak amacıyla yapılan analizler Müzik ve Resim Eğitimi ABD’nda eğitim alan öğrencilerin öğretmenlik meslek bilgisi derslerine diğer bölüm öğrencilerinden daha az değer verdikleri bulunmuştur. Derse verilen düşük değer ise öğrencilerin içsel motivasyonları ve derin strateji kullanımları ile negatif yönde ilişkili bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özgüngör, S., Kapıkıran, Ş. (2008). Fine Arts Education Students’ Motivation and Achievement Levels in Teacher Education. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 23, 47–60. https://ajindex.com/articles/138451

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Anderson, L. M., Brubaker, N. L., Alleman-Brooks, J., & Duffy, G. G. (1985). A qualitative study of seatwork in first-grade classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 123-140.
  2. Bandura, A. (1982). The assessment and predictive generality of self-percepts of efficacy. Journal of Behavior Therapy & Experimental Psychiatry. 13(3), 195-199.
  3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman. Bandalos, D. L., Yates, K., & Thorndike-Christ, T. (1995). Effects of math self-concept, perceived self-efficacy, and attributions for failure and success on test anxiety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 611-623.
  4. Belmont, M., Skinner, E., Wellborn, J., & Connell, J.P. (1992). Teacher as Social Context (TASC): Two measures of teacher provision of involvement, structure, and autonomy support: Student report measure (Tech. Rep). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Akgün, Ö. E., Özkahveci, Ö., Demirel, F. (2004). Güdülenme ve öğrenme stratejileri ölçeğinin Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 4 (2), 207-239.
  5. Chemers, M. M., Hu, L. & Garcia, B. F. (2001). Academic self-efficacy and first-year college student performance and adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology. 93(1), 55-64.
  6. Deci, E. L., Nezlek, J., & Sheinman, L. (1981). Charecteristics of the rewarder and instrinsic motivation of rewardee. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 1-10.
  7. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1024-1037.
  8. Deci, E. L., Schwartz, A., Sheinman, L., & ve Ryan, R. M. (1981). An instrument to assess adults’ orientations toward control versus autonomy with children: Reflections on instrinsic motivation and perceived competence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 642-650.
  9. Eccles, J. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J.T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives (pp. 75-146). San Francisco: Freeman. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (1985). Teacher expectations and student motivation. In J. Dusek (Ed.), Teacher expectancies (pp. 185-226).
  10. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Flink, C., Boggiano, A. K., Main, D. S., Barrett, M., & ve Katz, P. A. (1992). Children’s achievement related behaviors: The role of extrinsic and instrinsic motivational orientations. In A. K. Boggiano & T. S. Pittman (Eds.), Achievement and Motivation: A Social- Developmental Pers