SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2020 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2

Impacts of Providing Online Teacher and Peer Feedback on Students’ Writing Performance

Wardani Dwi WIHASTYANANG
Shirly Rizki KUSUMANINGRUM
M. Adnan LATIEF
Bambang Yudi CAHYONO
Pages
178–189
Publication Date
2020-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The result of this study revealed that the students having the online teacher and peer feedback provided through Edmodo did not perform better in writing than those who experienced teacher feedback in the conventional method.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to identify the effectiveness of online teacher with peer feedback provided on students’ writing performance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Furthermore, with the development of technology, it is more interesting to integrate information and communication technology ICT in EFL writing classes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The result of this study revealed that the students having the online teacher and peer feedback provided through Edmodo did not perform better in writing than those who experienced teacher feedback in the conventional method.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Teacher feedback · Peer Feedback

Abstract

This study aimed to identify the effectiveness of online teacher with peer feedback provided on students’ writing performance. Some experts state that both teacher and students feel that teacher feedback on the students’ writing is essential, and it is believed to be the most effective feedback. On the other hand, the practice of peer feedback is supported by the theory of Vigotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development which holds that the cognitive development of individuals result from social interaction where individuals can learn from each other. Furthermore, with the development of technology, it is more interesting to integrate information and communication technology ICT in EFL writing classes. Hence, this study investigated the combination of these three aspects - teacher feedback, peer feedback, and Edmodo - and looked at the impact on the students’ writing performance. This study was a quasi-experimental, which involved 55 English Department students in a state university in Indonesia. These students were grouped into the experimental group and the control group. The result of this study revealed that the students having the online teacher and peer feedback provided through Edmodo did not perform better in writing than those who experienced teacher feedback in the conventional method.

🔖

Cite This Article

WIHASTYANANG, W. D., KUSUMANINGRUM, S. R., LATIEF, M. A., CAHYONO, B. Y. (2020). Impacts of Providing Online Teacher and Peer Feedback on Students’ Writing Performance. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2, 178–189. https://ajindex.com/articles/138439

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Adin, F. (2017). The Effect of Edmodo on Students’ Writing Skills in Recount Text. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 1(2), 73-79. doi: 10.20961/ijpte.v1i2.5038 Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Razavieh, A., & Sorensen, C. (2006). Introduction to Research in Education. Belmont: Thompson Wadsworth. Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language Testing in Practice: Designing and Developing Useful Language Tests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  2. Berg, E. C. (1999). The Effects of Trained Peer Response on ESL Students’ Revision Types and Writing Quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), 215-241. doi: 10.1016/s1060-3743(99)80115-5
  3. Berggren, J. (2015). Learning from Giving Feedback: a Study of Secondary-Level Students. ELT Journal 69(1), 58-70. doi: 10.1093/elt/ccu036 Berggren, J. (2013). Learning from Giving Feedback: Insights from EFL Writing Classrooms in a Swedish Lower Secondary School. Stockholm University. Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2010). Raising the Linguistic Accuracy Level of Advanced L2 Writers with Written Corrective Feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19(4), 204-217. doi: 10.1016/j. jslw.2010.10.002 Brown, J. D. (1996). Testing in Language Program. Upper Sadle River: Prentice Hall. Brown, H. D. (2004). Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education. Cho, Y. H., & Cho, K. (2011). Peer Reviewers Learn from Giving Comments. Inst Sci, 39, 629-643. doi: 10.1007/s11251-010-9146-1
  4. Cho, K., & MacArthur, C. (2011). Learning by Reviewing. Journal of Education Psychology, 103(1), 73-84. doi: 10.1037/a0021950
  5. Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. New Jersey: Persey Education. Dudeney, G, & Hockly, N. (2007). How to Teach English with Technology. Essex: Pearson Education. Ferris, D. R. (1997). The Influence of Teacher Commentary on Student Revision. TESOL Quarterly, 31 (2), 315-339. doi: 10.2307/3588049 Ferris, D. R., Pezone, S., Tade, C. R., & Tinti, S. (1997). Teacher Commentary on Student Writing: Descriptions and Implications. Journal of Second Language Writing, 6(2), 155-182. doi: 10.1016/ s1060-3743(97)90032-1 188 Ferris, D., & Hedgcock, J. S. (1998). Teaching ESL Composition: Purpose, Process, and Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Guenette, D. (2007). Is Feedback Pedagogically Correct? Research Design Issues in Studies of Feedback on Writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 40-