Journals / Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 45

Contextual Antecedents of Psychological Well-Being in Physical Education

Beden Eğitiminde Psikolojik İyi Oluşun Bağlamsal Temelleri

Pages
99–115
Publication Date
2019-01-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Bearing in mind that teacher’s autonomy support in physical education can be considered as a tool to enhance adolescents’ concentration and vitality while it can help to reduced adolescents’ fear of negative evaluation and social appearance anxiety.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of the study was to examine contextual antecedents of psychological well-being in physical education classes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data were collected from 431 high school students in two public high schools.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Bearing in mind that teacher’s autonomy support in physical education can be considered as a tool to enhance adolescents’ concentration and vitality while it can help to reduced adolescents’ fear of negative evaluation and social appearance anxiety.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Özerklik desteği · motivasyon · temel psikolojik ihtiyaçlar

Abstract

The aim of the study was to examine contextual antecedents of psychological well-being in physical education classes. Data were collected from 431 high school students in two public high schools. Questionnaire pack consisted of the scales tapping students’ perception of teacher’s autonomy support, basic psychological needs satisfaction, intrinsic motivation, fear of negative evaluation, social appearance anxiety, subjective vitality and concentration. Path analysis supported a model in which autonomy support positively predicted students’ psychological need satisfaction, which, in turn positively influenced students’ intrinsic motivation. Intrinsic motivation positively predicted concentration and subjective vitality positively, fear of negative evaluation negatively. Bearing in mind that teacher’s autonomy support in physical education can be considered as a tool to enhance adolescents’ concentration and vitality while it can help to reduced adolescents’ fear of negative evaluation and social appearance anxiety.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı beden eğitimi derslerinde psikolojik iyi oluşun bağlamsal temellerini incelemektir. Veriler, iki devlet okulundan toplam 431 lise öğrencisinden toplanmıştır. Ölçek paketi, algılanan özerklik desteği, temel psikolojik ihtiyaçların tatmini, içsel güdülenme, öznel zindelik, konsantrasyon, olumsuz değerlendirilme korkusu ve sosyal görünüş kaygısını ölçen ölçeklerden oluşmaktadır. Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli sonuçları, derste öğretmenin yarattığı özerklik desteğinin, öğrencilerin üç temel psikolojik ihtiyacını açıkladığı, içsel motivasyonunu desteklediği ve bu ilişkinin de öğrencilerin olumsuz değerlendirilme korkusu ve sosyal görünüş kaygısını negatif yönde, öznel zindelik ve konsantrasyon düzeylerini ise pozitif yönde açıkladığını göstermektedir. Sonuçlar ışığında beden eğitimi derslerinde özerklik desteği, ergenlik dönemindeki öğrencilerin konsantrasyonunu ve zindeliğini artıran, sosyal görünüş kaygısı ve olumsuz değerlendirilme korkusunu azaltan bir araç olarak düşünülebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KURUCAN, A., İLKER, G. E. (2019). Contextual Antecedents of Psychological Well-Being in Physical Education. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 45, 99–115. https://ajindex.com/articles/138271

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Ryan, R.M. ve Frederick, C. (1997). On energy, personality and health: subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being. Journal of Personality, 65, 529–565.
  2. Adie, J. W., Duda, J. L, ve Ntoumanis, N. (2012). Perceived coach-autonomy support, basic need satisfaction and the well- and ill-being of elite youth soccer players: A longitudinal investigation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13, 51-59.
  3. Sheikhi Fini, A. A., Kavousian, J., Beigy, A. ve Emami, M. (2010). Subjective vitality and its anticipating variables on students. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 150–156.
  4. Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R.M., Deci, E. L. ve Kasser, T. (2004). The independent effects of goal contents and motives on well-being: it’s both what you pursue and why you pursue it. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 475-486.
  5. Standage, M. ve Gillison, F. (2007). Students' motivational responses toward school physical education and their relationship to general self-esteem and health-related quality of life. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8, 704-721.
  6. Standage, M., Duda, J. L. ve Ntoumanis, N. (2005). A test of self-determination theory in school physical education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 411-433.
  7. Standage, M., Duda, J.L. ve Ntoumanis, N. (2003). A model of contextual motivation in physical education: using constructs from self-determination and achievement goal theories to predict physical activity intentions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 97-110.
  8. Stone, D. N., Deci, E. L. ve Ryan, R. M. (2009). Beyond talk: creating autonomous motivation through self-determination theory. Journal of General Management, 34(3), 75-91.
  9. Taylor, I. M. ve Lonsdale, C. (2010). Cultural differences in the relationships among autonomy support, psychological need satisfaction, subjective vitality, and effort in British and Chinese physical education. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 32, 655-673.
  10. Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Towards a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 271-359). New York: Academic Press.
  11. Hart, E. A., Leary, M. R. ve Rejeski, W. J. (1989). The measurement of social physique anxiety. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 11, 94-104.
  12. Wıllıams, G. C., Gagne, M., Ryan, R. M. ve Deci, E. L. (2002). Facilitating autonomous motivation for smoking cessation. Health Psychology, 21, 40–50.
  13. Wıllıams, G. C., Grow, V. M., Freedman, Z., Ryan, R. M. ve Deci, E