Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2020 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2

A Study of the Graduate Theses on Distance Learning Administration in Turkey from 1999 to 2019

Pages
17–36
Publication Date
2020-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The other findings of this study are presented in a discussion regarding the findings of other studies in the literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study covers 117 masters and 28 doctorate theses published between 1999-2019 in Turkey for a total of 145 theses on distance learning administration.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Due to the goal of analyzing graduate theses published in the field of distance learning administration in Turkey between the years of 1999-2019, qualitative research method was used in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The other findings of this study are presented in a discussion regarding the findings of other studies in the literature.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Educational administration · distance learning administration · distance education

Abstract

This study covers 117 masters and 28 doctorate theses published between 1999-2019 in Turkey for a total of 145 theses on distance learning administration. Due to the goal of analyzing graduate theses published in the field of distance learning administration in Turkey between the years of 1999-2019, qualitative research method was used in this study. The distribution of subjects within these theses was found to focus on 6 main themes. These themes, in decreasing frequency, were services required by distance education institutions, analysis – evaluation studies, factors influencing distance education services, issues encountered in distance learning administration, recommendation studies, and comparative studies. The policy recommendations of research in distance learning administration focused on three categories. These categories, in decreasing frequency order, were policy recommendations towards services required by distance education institutions, policy recommendations regarding factors influencing distance education services, and policy recommendations regarding issues faced in distance learning administration. No other research, evaluating the research on distance learning administration in Turkey along with the policy recommendations made by these studies was encountered in the literature review. The other findings of this study are presented in a discussion regarding the findings of other studies in the literature.

🔖

Cite This Article

KESİM, E. (2020). A Study of the Graduate Theses on Distance Learning Administration in Turkey from 1999 to 2019. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2, 17–36. https://ajindex.com/articles/138242

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Aydin, M. (2014). Egitim yonetimi [Educational administration]. (10. baski). Ankara:
  2. Gazi Kitabevi.
  3. Aypay, A., Coruk, A., Yazgan, D., Kartal, O., Cagatay, M., Tuncer, B., & Emran, B. (2010). The status of research in educational administration: An analysis of educational administration journals, 1999- 2007. Eurasian journal of educational research, 39, 59-77.
  4. Balci, A. (2019). Aciklamali egitim yonetimi terimleri sozlugu [Annotated dictionary of educational administration terms] (4. baski). Ankara:
  5. Pegem Akademi. Bates, T. (2015). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning. Vancouver: BCcampus Open Textbooks. Daniel, J. S. (2010). Mega-schools, technology and teachers. Achieving education for all. New York: Routledge. Firat, M. (2019). Uygulamadan kurama acik ve uzaktan ogrenme. [Open and distance learning from practice to theory]. Ankara:
  6. Nobel Yayincilik. Gedikoglu, T. (2015). Liderlik ve okul yonetimi [Leadership and school management]. Ankara:
  7. Ani Yayincilik. Graham, C.R. (2019). Current research in blended learning. In M.G. Moore & W. C. Diehl (Eds.), Handbook of Distance Education (pp.173-188). (Fourth Edition). Newyork & London: Routledge. Holmberg, B. (1987). The development of distance education research. American Journal of Distance Education, 1 (3), 16-23. Retrieved September 10, 2019 from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/ abs/10.1080/08923648709526594 Isman, A. (2011). Uzaktan egitim [Distance education]. (4. baski). Ankara:
  8. Pegem Akademi. Kaya, Z. (2002). Uzaktan egitim [Distance education]. Ankara:
  9. Pegem A Yayincilik. Khan, B. (2005). Managing e-learning strategies: Design, delivery, implementation and evolution. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing. Kumar, R. (2011). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners. (3th edition). London: Sage Publications. Leavy, P. (2017). Research design. Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based and community-based participatory research approaches. New York: The Guilford Press.
  10. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G.B. (2016) Designing qualitative research. (6th edition). Los Angeles, California: Sage Publications. Merriam, S.B., & Tisdell, E.J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. (4th edition). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications. Miller, G.E. (2010). Organization and technology of di