SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 27

The Organizational Cynicism Levels of the Teachers

Öğretmenlerin Örgütsel Sinizm Düzeylerinin İncelenmesi

Gamze KALAĞAN
Cem Oktay GÜZELLER
Pages
83–97
Publication Date
2010-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the diagnosis of the research; a meaningful relation between the teachers’ organizational cynicism level and with their branches, occupational seniorities, educational status, the type of school where they work, the reason why they choose being a teacher is found.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to determine whether or not the teachers’ demographic properties such as teachers’ gender, marital status, branches, ages, occupational seniorities, educational status, the types of schools where they work, the reason why they choose being a teacher lead to vary the organizational cynicism of the teachers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study was conducted on 325 elementary and secondary school teachers working in Antalya city center in 2007-2008 academic year.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the diagnosis of the research; a meaningful relation between the teachers’ organizational cynicism level and with their branches, occupational seniorities, educational status, the type of school where they work, the reason why they choose being a teacher is found.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007-2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Sinizm · Örgütsel Sinizm · Öğretmen

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine whether or not the teachers’ demographic properties such as teachers’ gender, marital status, branches, ages, occupational seniorities, educational status, the types of schools where they work, the reason why they choose being a teacher lead to vary the organizational cynicism of the teachers. The study was conducted on 325 elementary and secondary school teachers working in Antalya city center in 2007-2008 academic year. In this research, the organizational cynicism scale which was developed by Güzeller and Kalagan (2008) is used. In this data analysis T â€" test, simple variance analysis, Kruskal Wallis test, Mann Whitney U â€" test is used. According to the diagnosis of the research; a meaningful relation between the teachers’ organizational cynicism level and with their branches, occupational seniorities, educational status, the type of school where they work, the reason why they choose being a teacher is found.

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı; öğretmenlerin cinsiyetleri, medeni durumları, branşları, yaşları, mesleki kıdemleri, eğitim durumları, çalıştıkları okul türleri, öğretmenliği seçme nedenleri gibi demografik özellikler açısından örgütsel sinizm düzeylerinin değişip değişmediğini belirlemektir. Araştırma 2007-2008 eğitim-öğretim yılında Antalya il merkezinde ilköğretim ve ortaöğretim kurumlarında görev yapan 325 öğretmen üzerinden gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmada, Güzeller ve Kalagan (2008) tarafından geliştirilmiş olan örgütsel sinizm ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Verileriniz analizinde, T testi, Tek yönlü varyans analizi, Kruskal Wallis testi, Mann Whitney U-testi kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın bulgularına göre; öğretmenlerin örgütsel sinizm düzeyi ile branşları, mesleki kıdemleri, eğitim durumları, çalıştıkları okul türü, öğretmenliği seçme nedenleri arasındaki anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

KALAĞAN, G., GÜZELLER, C. O. (2010). The Organizational Cynicism Levels of the Teachers. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 27, 83–97. https://ajindex.com/articles/138156

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Abraham, R. (2000). Organizational cynicism: Bases and consequences, Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs,3(126), 269-292.
  2. Andersson, L., (1996). Employee Cynicism: An Examination Using a Contract Violation Framework, Human Relations, No. 49, 1395-1418.
  3. Andersson, L.M. and Bateman, T.S. (1997). Cynicism in the Workplace: Some Causes and Effects, The Journal of Organizational Behavior, No.18, 449-470.
  4. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2006), Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı, Ankara:
  5. Pegem A Yayıncılık. Brandes, P.M (1997), Organizational Cynicism: Its Nature, Antecedents, and Consequences. Unpublished Doctora Dissertation.The University of Cincinnati. Brandes, P. and Das, D. (2006). Locating Behaviour Cynicism at Work: Construct Issues and Performance Health, Coping and Methodologies (Edt. Pamela L.Perrewe, Daniel C. Ganster), JAI Press, New York, 233-266.
  6. Employee Bateman, T. S., Sakano, T., and Fujita, M. (1992),
  7. Roger, Me, and My Attitude: Film Propaganda and Cynicism Toward Corporate Leadership, The Journal of Applied Psychology, 77 (5), 768-771.
  8. Bommer, W.H., Rich, G.A. and Rubin, R.S. (2005), Changing Attitudes About Change: Longitudinal Effects of Transformational Leader Behaviour on Employee Cynicism about Organizational Change, The Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 26, 733-753. Cartwright,S.ve Holmes,N.(2006). The meaning of work: The challenge of regaining employee engagement and reducing cynicism. Human Resource Management Review, 16, 199–208.
  9. Dean Jr, J.W., Brandes, P. ve Dharwadkar, R. (1998). Organizational cynicism. The Academy of Management Review, 2 (23), 341-352.
  10. Delken, M.(2004), Organizational Cynicism: A Study Among Call Centers.Unpublished Master Dissertation, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Maastricht, Maastricht. Efilti, S., Gönen, Y. ve Öztürk, F. (2008), Örgütsel Sinizm: Akdeniz Üniversitesinde Görev Yapan Yönetici Sekreterler Üzerinde Bir Alan Araştırması, 7. Ulusal Büro Yönetimi ve Sekreterlik Kongresi Kitabı, Trabzon:Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi.
  11. Erdost, H.E., Karacaoğlu, K., ve Reyhanoğlu, M. (2007), Örgütsel Sinizm Kavramı ve ilgili Ölçeklerin Türkiye’deki Bir Firmada Test Edilmesi. 15. Ulusal Yönetim Ve Organizasyon Kongresi Kitabı (s. 513-523). Sakarya: Sakarya Üniversitesi,, Fero, H. C. (2005), Flow and Cynicism in the Workplace. Dissertation, University, Claremont, California. Doctor Graduate Goldner, F.H., Ritti, R.R., and Ference, T.P. (1977), The Production of Cynical Knowled