SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 /

Examining Validity and Reliability of Transformational Teaching Questionnaire

Dönüşümcü Öğretim Ölçeğinin Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik İncelemesi

Sinan YILDIRIM
Yılmaz YÜKSEL
Emre BİLGİN
Alper YILDIZ
Özgür Yaşar AKYAR
Ziya KORUÇ
Pages
191–204
Publication Date
2019-09-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It can be said that the Turkish version of the “Transformational Teaching Questionnaire” can be used as a valid and reliable measurement tool in researches.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose of this research was to adapt Beauchamp and colleagues’ (2010) "Transformational Teaching Questionnaire" to Turkish that is inspired by the transformational leadership concept from theories of leadership. 265 high school students between 15-19 (Mage = 16, SD = .95) years old (141 girls and 124 boys) participated to this study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A questionnaire composed of 16 items and four subscales as; idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, and individualized consideration.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It can be said that the Turkish version of the “Transformational Teaching Questionnaire” can be used as a valid and reliable measurement tool in researches.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:dönüşümcü liderlik · dönüşümcü öğretim · beden eğitimi

Abstract

Purpose of this research was to adapt Beauchamp and colleagues’ (2010) "Transformational Teaching Questionnaire" to Turkish that is inspired by the transformational leadership concept from theories of leadership. 265 high school students between 15-19 (Mage = 16, SD = .95) years old (141 girls and 124 boys) participated to this study. The questionnaire is used for evaluation of students’ perceptions about their teacher. A questionnaire composed of 16 items and four subscales as; idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, and individualized consideration. Pearson correlation analysis, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, and confirmatory factor analysis were used for data analyses. For a model with 16 items and 4 factors, the correlations between Turkish and original (English) forms were found between 0.79-0.94 while, test-retest correlations were between 0.77-0.85. Internal consistency values varied between 0.78-0.87. Moreover, factor loadings were calculated between 0.48 and 0.83. According to the confirmatory factor analysis results, model fit indices (χ2/sd= 2.474, RMSEA= 0.075; CFI=0.98, NFI=0.97, NNFI=0.98, IFI=0.98, RFI=0.97, GFI=0.90, AGFI=0.86) indicated the data compatibility of the model appeared to be within acceptable and perfect limits. It can be said that the Turkish version of the “Transformational Teaching Questionnaire” can be used as a valid and reliable measurement tool in researches.

Özet

Bu araştırmada, liderlik kuramlarından dönüşümcü liderlik teorisinden esinlenerek Beauchamp ve diğerleri (2010)’nin geliştirdiği “Dönüşümcü Öğretim Ölçeğinin” Türkçe’ye uyarlanması amaçlanmaktadır. Araştırmaya orta öğretim kurumlarında eğitim alan 141 kız, 124 erkek, toplam 265 öğrenci (ort.yaş= 16 ±.95 yıl – 15-19 yaş aralığında) katılmıştır. Ölçek öğrencilerin algılamalarıyla öğretmen davranışlarını değerlendirmekte kullanılmaktadır. Ölçek 16 madde ve dört alt boyuttan oluşmaktadır: idealize etki, ilham veren motivasyon, entelektüel uyarım ve bireysel saygı. Verilerin analizinde pearson korelasyon analizi, Cronbach alfa iç tutarlık katsayısı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizi kullanılmıştır. 16 madde ve 4 faktörlü yapı için, Türkçe İngilizce formların korelasyonları 0.79-0.94 arasında; test-tekrar test korelasyonları ise 0.77-0.85 aralığında bulunmuştur. İç tutarlık değerlerinin 0.78-0.87 arasında; ölçeğin faktör yük değerlerinin 0.48 ile 0.83 arasında değiştiği görülmektedir. Doğrulayıcı faktör analizine göre modelin uyum indeks değerleri (χ2/sd= 2.474, RMSEA= 0.075; CFI=0.98, NFI=0.97, NNFI=0.98, IFI=0.98, RFI=0.97, GFI=0.90, AGFI=0.86) kabul edilebilir ve mükemmel uyum sınırlarında göstermektedir. “Dönüşümcü Öğretim Ölçeği” Türkçe versiyonunun geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçüm aracı olarak araştırmalarda kullanılabileceği söylenebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIRIM, S., YÜKSEL, Y., BİLGİN, E., YILDIZ, A., AKYAR, Ö. Y., KORUÇ, Z. (2019). Examining Validity and Reliability of Transformational Teaching Questionnaire. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 191–204. https://ajindex.com/articles/138098

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Álvarez Solves, O., Castillo, I., Molina-García, V., & Balagué Gea, G. (2016). Transformational leadership on the athletic field: An international review. Revista de psicología del deporte, 25(2), 319-326.
  2. Avci, A. (2015). Investigation of Transformational and Transactional Leadership Styles of School Principals, and Evaluation of Them in Terms of Educational Administration. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(20), 2758-2767.
  3. Barling, J., Weber, T., & Kelloway, E. K. (1996). Effects of transformational leadership training on attitudinal and financial outcomes: A field experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(6), 827. Bass, BM. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York, Free Press.
  4. Bass, BM. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organ Dynamics, 18,19-31.
  5. Bass, BM. (1996). A New Paradigm of Leadership: An Inquiry into Transformational Leadership. Virginia, U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences. Beauchamp, M. R., Barling, J., Li, Z., Morton, K. L., Keith, S. E., & Zumbo, B. D. (2010). Development and psychometric properties of the transformational teaching questionnaire. Journal of Health Psychology, 15(8), 1123-1134.
  6. Beauchamp, M. R., & Morton, K. L. (2011). Transformational teaching and physical activity engagement among adolescents. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 39(3), 133-139.
  7. Beauchamp, M. R., Barling, J., & Morton, K. L. (2011). Transformational teaching and adolescent self‐determined motivation, self‐efficacy, and intentions to engage in leisure time physical activity: A randomised controlled pilot trial. Applied Psychology: Health and Well‐Being, 3(2), 127-150.
  8. Beauchamp, M. R., Liu, Y., Morton, K. L., Martin, L. J., Wilson, A. H., Wilson, A. J.,. & Barling, J. (2014). Transformational teaching and adolescent physical activity: Multilevel and mediational effects. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 21(3), 537-546.
  9. Boberg, J. E., & Bourgeois, S. J. (2016). The effects of integrated transformational leadership on achievement. Journal of Educational Administration, 54(3), 357-374.
  10. Bourne, J., Liu, Y., Shields, C. A., Jackson, B., Zumbo, B. D., & Beauchamp, M. R. (2015). The relationship between transformational teaching and adolescent physical activity: the mediating roles of personal and relational efficacy beliefs. Journal of Health Psychology, 20(2), 132-143.
  11. Browne, MW., Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing mod