Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2018 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 4

The Use of ICT Tools in E-Mentoring: A Case Study

Pages
76–89
Publication Date
2018-10-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found out that e-mail, social networking, phone conversations, SMS, instant mobile messaging applications, online storage, online documents, blog, LMS and teleconference technologies were utilized to provide interaction in the e-mentoring process.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This is a case study designed with qualitative research pattern.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study group consisted of 44 undergraduate students as mentees and 8 graduate students as mentors.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found out that e-mail, social networking, phone conversations, SMS, instant mobile messaging applications, online storage, online documents, blog, LMS and teleconference technologies were utilized to provide interaction in the e-mentoring process.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:E-mentoring · group mentoring · mentor

Abstract

This is a case study designed with qualitative research pattern. It investigated the use of information and communication technologies in the e-mentoring process. The study group consisted of 44 undergraduate students as mentees and 8 graduate students as mentors. The program was carried out in group mentoring model in which graduate students were appointed as e-mentors for the undergraduate students for developing multimedia projects. The study data were collected using the project reports prepared by mentors and mentee groups, system logs of the interaction areas, observational notes of the researcher, and written forms seeking opinions of the mentees about the process. The data collected with different instruments were analysed with separate content analysis. It was found out that e-mail, social networking, phone conversations, SMS, instant mobile messaging applications, online storage, online documents, blog, LMS and teleconference technologies were utilized to provide interaction in the e-mentoring process. Among those, instant messaging and social networking sites proved the most effectively used ones, which the participants are also accustomed to in their daily lives. Most of the participants found the ICT tools used sufficient for interaction in the process. Still, some mentors and mentees stated that face-to-face interactions should also take place in the e-mentoring process.

🔖

Cite This Article

ONGOZ, S. (2018). The Use of ICT Tools in E-Mentoring: A Case Study. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 4, 76–89. https://ajindex.com/articles/138045

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Akin, L., & Hilbun, J. (2007). E-mentoring in three voices. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 10(1). Retrieved November 28, 2017 from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/cb11/9ea8d9823d4ffdf734a6a4fac344bce1fb6c. pdf Anderson, E. M., & Shannon, A. L. (1988). Toward a conceptualization of mentoring. Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 38–42. doi: 10.1177/002248718803900109 Bierema, L. L., & Merriam, S. B. (2002). E-mentoring: Using computer mediated communication to enhance the mentoring process. Innovative Higher Education, 26(3), 211-227. Doi: 10.1023/A:1017921023103 Burgstahler, S., & Crawford, L. (2007). Managing an e-mentoring community to support students with disabilities: A case study. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education Journal, 15(2), 97-114.
  2. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design, qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd Edition). London: Sage Publications. Crisp, G., & Cruz, I. (2009). Mentoring college students: A critical review of the literature between 1990 and 2007. Research in Higher Education, 50(6), 525-545. doi: 10.1007/s11162-009-9130-2
  3. DiRenzo, M. S., Linnehan, F., Shao, P., & Rosenberg, W. L. (2010). A moderated mediation model of e-mentoring. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76(2), 292-305. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2009.10.003 Eby, L. T., & McManus, S. E. (2004). The protege's role in negative mentoring experiences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65(2), 255-275. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2003.07.001 Ensher, E. A., Heun, C., & Blanchard, A. (2003). Online mentoring and computer-mediated communication: New directions in research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(2), 264-288. doi:10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00044-7
  4. Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (1996). Educational research and introduction (6.th Edition). USA: Longman Publisher.
  5. Gareis, C. R., & Nussbaum-Beach, S. (2007). Electronically mentoring to develop accomplished professional teachers. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 20(3-4), 227-246. doi:10.1007/s11092-008-9060-0 88 Guriting, P., Chunwen, G., & Ndu, N. N. O. (2007). Computer self-efficacy levels, perceptions and adoption of online banking. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 8(1), 54-61. doi: 10.1504/IJSTM.2007.012218 Griffiths, M., & Miller, H. (2005). E-mentoring: Does it have a place in medicine? Postgraduate Medical Journal, 81(956), 389-390. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2004.029702 Hamilton, B. A., & Scandura, T. A. (2003). E-Mentoring: Implicati