Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2020 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2

Who Takes a MOOC? Profile of Students in the Framework of a European Project

Pages
1–16
Publication Date
2020-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this regard, the results suggest that the design of MOOCs should be based on a sustainable, social and communicative curricular approach while at the same time greatly enhancing interaction and collaborative work.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This research analyzes the profile of students on MOOC (massive open online courses) courses within the framework of the ECO project (E-learning, Communication and Open-Data: Massive Mobile, Ubiquitous and Open Learning) promoted by the European Union.
📊
Key Findings & Data:An analysis of the profile of students enrolled in the five editions of the course entitled “Educational innovation and professional development.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this regard, the results suggest that the design of MOOCs should be based on a sustainable, social and communicative curricular approach while at the same time greatly enhancing interaction and collaborative work.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:MOOC · higher education

Abstract

This research analyzes the profile of students on MOOC (massive open online courses) courses within the framework of the ECO project (E-learning, Communication and Open-Data: Massive Mobile, Ubiquitous and Open Learning) promoted by the European Union. An analysis of the profile of students enrolled in the five editions of the course entitled “Educational innovation and professional development. Possibilities and limits of technology” has been conducted based on the following objectives: (a) gain knowledge about the profile of students; (b) identify the students’ perception of their level of digital competence for participating in the course; (c) find out what their real expectations were when they enrolled on the course; and (d) suggest proposals for improving the design of the course based on the study carried out on the student profile. This research shows the tendencies of students enrolled on these types of training processes and suggests improvements in the design of the course in order to satisfy the participants’ motivations and expectations. In this regard, the results suggest that the design of MOOCs should be based on a sustainable, social and communicative curricular approach while at the same time greatly enhancing interaction and collaborative work.

🔖

Cite This Article

FERNANDEZ-DIAZ, E., RODRIGUEZ-HOYOS, C., DOMINGUEZ, J. L. B., SALVADOR, A. C. (2020). Who Takes a MOOC? Profile of Students in the Framework of a European Project. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2, 1–16. https://ajindex.com/articles/137916

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Adamopoulos, P. (2013). What makes a great MOOC? An interdisciplinary analysis of student retention in online courses. Paper presented at the International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2013, Milan. Retrieved from http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~padamopo/What%20makes%20a%20 great%20MOOC.pdf Aguado Franco, J. C. (2017). MOOC from a practical perspective. RIED, Revista Iberoamericana de Educacion a Distancia, 20(1), 31-38. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.20.1
  2. Alarios-Hoyos, C., Estevez-Ayres, I., Perez-Sanagustin, M., Delgado Kloos, C., & Fernandez-Panadero, C. (2017). Understanding learners’ motivation and learning strategies in MOOC. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.19173/irrodl. v18i3.2996 Armstrong, L. (2014). 2013-The Year of Ups and Downs for the MOOCs. Changing Higher Education. Retrieved from http://goo.gl/SqwGWn
  3. Barcena, E., Martin-Monje, E., & Read, T. (2015). Potentiating the human dimension in Language MOOCs. Proceedings of the European Stakeholder Summit on experiences and best practices in and around MOOCs, EMOOCs 2015,
  4. Mons, Belgium, 46-54. Retrieved from http://www. emoocs2015.eu/sites/default/files/Papers.pdf Barcena, E., & Read, T. (2015). The role of modularity and mobility in language MOOCS. Verbeia, 1, 28- 35. Retrieved from http://www.ucjc.edu/book/verbeia-revista-de-estudios-filologicos-no-0/
  5. Belanger, Y., & Thornton, J. (2013). Biolectricity: A Quantitative Approach. Duke‘s University‘s First MOOC. Retrieved from: http://dukespace.lib.duke.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/10161/6216/ Duke_Bioelectricity_MOO C_Fall2012.pdf Bentley, P., Crump, H., Cuffe, P., Gniadek, B. J., MacNeill, S., & Mor, Y. (2014). Signals of Success and Self-Directed Learning. Proceedings of EMOOC 2014:
  6. European MOOC Stakeholder Summit, Lausanne, Switzerland, pp. 5-10. Retrieved from http://goo.gl/jkHP4q
  7. Bernal Gonzalez, M. (2015). Abandono de los estudiantes en los MOOC [Student dropouts in MOOCs]. (Master Dissertation). University of Murcia. Retrieved from https://digitum.um.es/xmlui/ handle/10201/46706 Bernal Gonzalez, M., Sanchez Vera, M., & Prendes Espinosa, M. (2016). Intereses y expectativas de los participantes en MOOC: un estudio de caso. [Motivations and expectations of MOOC participants: a case study]. In-Red Conference 2018.
  8. Valencia, Spain. http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/ INRED2016.2016.4363 Birnbaum, M. H. (2004). Human research and data collection via the Internet. Annual Review of Psychology,